發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-14 23:33

  本文選題：強(qiáng)制措施 + 變更　； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)刑事訴訟法中明確規(guī)定了刑事強(qiáng)制措施的主要功能之一是為了保障刑事訴訟能夠順利進(jìn)行，但是法律為適應(yīng)案件的動(dòng)態(tài)變化以及保護(hù)當(dāng)事人的正當(dāng)權(quán)益又規(guī)定了強(qiáng)制措施變更制度，特別在新修改的刑訴法中有不少的法條都有涉及到強(qiáng)制措施的變更。但是在實(shí)踐中關(guān)于強(qiáng)制措施變更的探討還有待深入。本文旨在提出我國(guó)刑事強(qiáng)制措施變更中存在的諸多問(wèn)題，然后分析其存在的原因，，最后提出一套在實(shí)踐中具有可操作性的措施以及一些具體的完善建議。 本文分為三個(gè)部分，第一部分是對(duì)刑事強(qiáng)制措施變更含義的分析，介紹我國(guó)目前關(guān)于刑事強(qiáng)制措施變更含義的現(xiàn)狀，然后從狹義和廣義兩個(gè)方面對(duì)強(qiáng)制措施變更的含義進(jìn)行分析，并且分別對(duì)強(qiáng)制措施的各種變更情形進(jìn)行分別定義，指出解除與撤銷的區(qū)別；其次，對(duì)刑事強(qiáng)制措施變更的原則進(jìn)行分析，分別有：法定、及時(shí)、便利、比例、人道主義等原則。最后闡述了刑事強(qiáng)制措施變更在司法實(shí)踐中存在的意義。 第二部分是對(duì)我國(guó)強(qiáng)制措施變更中存在的問(wèn)題和原因進(jìn)行探討和分析。本章從實(shí)體上和程序上對(duì)強(qiáng)制措施存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行描述，主要有公安機(jī)關(guān)適用強(qiáng)制措施變更程序存在很大的隨意性，這種不合理的行為會(huì)對(duì)我國(guó)司法工作造成較大影響，嚴(yán)重影響到了法律的權(quán)威性，而且也容易對(duì)當(dāng)事人的權(quán)利利造成了侵害；其次是檢察機(jī)關(guān)在實(shí)踐中沒(méi)有發(fā)揮應(yīng)有的作用，監(jiān)督不到位，導(dǎo)致變更不及時(shí)；再次是我國(guó)強(qiáng)制措施變更的主體單一，不能有效相互制約；最后從立法、司法、觀念、現(xiàn)實(shí)等四個(gè)方面分析其存在的原因，來(lái)保障訴訟順利進(jìn)行。 第三部分是對(duì)提出規(guī)范我國(guó)強(qiáng)制措施變更的方法和改革思路。本文在強(qiáng)調(diào)立法理念的重要性，同時(shí)也是完善我國(guó)強(qiáng)制措施變更的前提；同時(shí)也提出檢察機(jī)關(guān)在司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)刑事強(qiáng)制措施的監(jiān)督應(yīng)該實(shí)質(zhì)化，以及一些配套的操作程序，這是本文中一些新的想法；最后建議應(yīng)當(dāng)擴(kuò)大當(dāng)事人的救濟(jì)渠道和普及法治知識(shí)等。
[Abstract]:One of the main functions of criminal coercive measures is clearly stipulated in our criminal procedure law to ensure that criminal proceedings can be carried out smoothly. However, in order to adapt to the dynamic changes of cases and to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, the law stipulates the system of change of coercive measures, especially in the newly revised Criminal procedure Law, there are many articles involving the change of coercive measures. However, in practice, there is still a need to explore the change of coercive measures. The purpose of this paper is to put forward many problems existing in the change of criminal coercive measures in our country, then analyze the reasons for their existence, and finally put forward a set of operable measures in practice and some concrete suggestions to improve them. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is the analysis of the meaning of the change of criminal coercive measures, and introduces the current situation of the change of the meaning of criminal coercive measures in China. Then from the narrow sense and broad sense of the meaning of the change of coercive measures are analyzed, and each of the changes of coercive measures are defined separately, pointing out the difference between rescission and revocation; secondly, The principles of the change of criminal coercive measures are: legal, timely, convenient, proportional, humanitarian and so on. Finally, it expounds the significance of the change of criminal coercive measures in judicial practice. The second part discusses and analyzes the problems and causes in the change of coercive measures in China. This chapter describes the problems existing in the coercive measures from the substantive and procedural aspects. There is a great deal of arbitrariness in the procedure of the public security organs applying the compulsory measures, and this unreasonable behavior will have a great impact on the judicial work of our country. It has seriously affected the authority of the law and easily infringed on the rights and interests of the parties; secondly, the procuratorial organs did not play their due role in practice, the supervision was not in place, and the changes were not timely; Thirdly, the main body of the change of coercive measures in our country is single, which can not effectively restrict each other. Finally, the author analyzes the reasons of its existence from four aspects: legislation, judicature, concept and reality, to ensure the smooth progress of litigation. The third part is to propose the method and the reform thought of standardizing the change of compulsory measures in our country. This article emphasizes the importance of the legislative idea and the premise of perfecting the change of compulsory measures in our country. At the same time, it also points out that the supervision of criminal coercive measures by procuratorial organs in judicial practice should be substantial, as well as some supporting operational procedures. This is some new ideas in this paper. Finally, it is suggested that the relief channels and knowledge of the rule of law should be expanded.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊旺年;論刑事訴訟強(qiáng)制措施的變更、解除和撤銷[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年05期

2 劉恒;;檢警一體化的基礎(chǔ)缺陷[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年02期

3 陳聞高;;論變更強(qiáng)制措施[J];公安研究;2006年11期

4 黃立;論對(duì)刑事偵查的檢察監(jiān)督[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年05期

5 高德友;完善取保候?qū)徶贫戎�管�?jiàn)[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年03期

6 朱海娃;;論強(qiáng)化檢察機(jī)關(guān)捕后變更強(qiáng)制措施的監(jiān)督[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2010年26期

7 陳衛(wèi)東,劉計(jì)劃;英國(guó)保釋制度及其對(duì)我國(guó)的借鑒意義[J];人民檢察;2003年03期

8 劉靜;李唐;;偵查監(jiān)督的困境與重構(gòu)——以捕后變更強(qiáng)制措施為視角[J];山西省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

9 管志清,陳琦;比例原則及其在刑事強(qiáng)制措施中的適用[J];鐵道警官高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

10 龍宗智;徘徊于傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代之間——論中國(guó)刑事訴訟法的再修改[J];政法論壇;2004年05期

本文編號(hào)：1889988