發(fā)布時間：2018-05-15 19:44

  本文選題：公訴案件 + 刑事和解　； 參考：《新疆大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國自古以來講究“以和為貴”，公訴案件和解程序的宗旨就是在尊重了當事人意思前提下化解當事人之間的糾紛，以充分保護當事人的合法權益。與近年來所倡導的刑罰輕緩化不謀而合。然而，由于中國的一些基層地區(qū)的習慣法治理思想和中國向來倡導的人治法文化傳統(tǒng)對其的影響，及新刑事訴訟法和部分司法解釋本身對當事人和解的公訴案件訴訟程序的規(guī)定比較廣泛，導致各地司法機關在實踐中對條文理解不一致，操作不相同，由此下去可能危及公平正義的底線。 因此，，本文由司法實踐出現(xiàn)的問題著手，指出我國現(xiàn)行刑訴法中公訴案件和解法律規(guī)定并不明確，導致和解制度在實踐中存在很多缺陷和不足，為此要求我們通過對刑事和解的范圍及公訴案件和解程序監(jiān)督力度及和解協(xié)議達成后履行情況等方面的具體分析，提出完善此項制度的措施。本文通過引言、正文、結論三個部分進行具體闡述。 引言部分是從司法實踐中刑事和解所現(xiàn)存的問題著手，提出了本文所要討論的問題。正文部分總共有三個部分，第一部分介紹了國內(nèi)開展刑事和解的概念，以及刑事和解在國外的發(fā)展概況。第二部分主要詳細分析現(xiàn)行《刑事訴訟法》關于當事人和解的公訴案件訴訟程序的法律法規(guī)，結合實踐中普遍存在的和解問題指出法規(guī)本身存在一定的漏洞。第三部分針對第二部分提出的問題，提出了自己的建議。
[Abstract]:Since ancient times, China has paid attention to "peace is the most important", and the purpose of the reconciliation procedure of public prosecution cases is to resolve the disputes between the parties on the premise of respecting the parties' wishes, so as to fully protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. It coincides with the mitigation of punishment advocated in recent years. However, due to the influence of the idea of customary law governance in some grass-roots areas of China and the cultural tradition of human law administration that China has always advocated, And the provisions of the new criminal procedure law and some judicial interpretations on the procedure of public prosecution cases where the parties reconcile themselves are relatively extensive, resulting in inconsistent understanding and operation of the articles in practice by the judicial organs in various parts of the country. This may endanger the bottom line of fairness and justice. Therefore, this paper begins with the problems in judicial practice, and points out that the current criminal procedure law of our country is not clear about the legal provisions of the reconciliation of public prosecution cases, which leads to a lot of defects and deficiencies in the system of reconciliation in practice. Therefore, we should put forward the measures to perfect this system through the concrete analysis of the scope of criminal reconciliation, the supervision of the reconciliation procedure of public prosecution cases and the performance of the settlement agreement after the conclusion of the settlement agreement. This article through the introduction, the text, the conclusion three parts carries on the concrete elaboration. The foreword part is from the judicial practice in the criminal reconciliation extant question, has proposed the question which this article will discuss. There are three parts in the text. The first part introduces the concept of criminal reconciliation in China and the development of criminal reconciliation in foreign countries. In the second part, the author analyzes in detail the laws and regulations of the current Criminal procedure Law concerning the procedure of the public prosecution cases concerning the reconciliation of the parties, and points out that there are certain loopholes in the rules and regulations in combination with the common problems of settlement in practice. The third part of the second part of the question, put forward their own suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：新疆大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 陳玉范,屈廣臣;“私了”問題的法律思考[J];當代法學;1995年01期

2 宋聚榮;王鵬;;試論檢察機關在刑事和解中的職能定位——以山東省檢察機關的實踐探索為基礎[J];中國司法;2009年12期

3 游偉;唐震;余劍;李長坤;;死刑案刑事和解之感性與理性[J];東方法學;2009年03期

4 艾佳慧;;刑事訴訟的制度變遷與理論發(fā)展——從《刑事訴訟的中國模式》切入[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2011年05期

5 雷小政;;刑事和解配套制度的實證分析與立法完善[J];法學雜志;2009年07期

6 包健;;刑事自訴案件視野下的和解制度[J];法學;2006年04期

7 劉偉;;背景與困境:刑事和解制度的理性考察[J];河北法學;2007年05期

8 周光權;;論刑事和解制度的價值[J];華東政法學院學報;2006年05期

9 馬永平;;輕傷害案件公訴階段適用刑事和解研究[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學院學報;2010年01期

10 施鵬鵬;;法國刑事和解程序及其借鑒意義[J];社會科學輯刊;2006年06期

本文編號：1893660