發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-16 16:29

  本文選題：訴訟標(biāo)的 + 訴的合并��； 參考：《山西大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：訴訟標(biāo)的理論是民事訴訟法學(xué)的基本理論之一,關(guān)于訴訟標(biāo)的理論的大多數(shù)研究長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)主要集中在訴訟標(biāo)的識(shí)別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)理論探討上。目前,民事訴訟法學(xué)界還沒(méi)有對(duì)訴訟標(biāo)的理論對(duì)其他民事訴訟理論的影響進(jìn)行深層次的研究,而訴訟標(biāo)的理論之所以在民事訴訟法學(xué)中有著重要的理論地位,恰恰與訴訟標(biāo)的理論對(duì)民事訴訟其他理論的重要的作用和影響密不可分,可以稱(chēng)之為是民事訴訟法學(xué)的“脊梁”筆者以民事訴訟標(biāo)的的機(jī)能這一全新的理論視角作為論題,采用系統(tǒng)分析和實(shí)證分析的研究方法深入剖析了各種不同的訴訟標(biāo)的理論對(duì)訴的變更、訴的合并、既判力的客觀范圍以及重復(fù)訴訟認(rèn)定的作用和影響。并進(jìn)一步研究了訴訟標(biāo)的機(jī)能在我國(guó)民事訴訟中的具體體現(xiàn),進(jìn)而指出我國(guó)民事訴訟立法和司法中對(duì)于訴訟標(biāo)的的相關(guān)問(wèn)題在具體運(yùn)作方面存在的不足。在此基礎(chǔ)上,筆者對(duì)訴訟標(biāo)的的含義及其識(shí)別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)理論進(jìn)行了再構(gòu)造,提出了在訴訟標(biāo)的概念統(tǒng)一論和訴訟標(biāo)的統(tǒng)一識(shí)別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)否定論的前提下重新構(gòu)建訴訟標(biāo)的理論的觀點(diǎn)。對(duì)于訴訟標(biāo)的的含義筆者采“一分肢說(shuō),,觀點(diǎn),即訴訟標(biāo)的就是原告的訴之聲明中主張的抽象的法律效果。因此,訴訟標(biāo)的的內(nèi)容應(yīng)依原告訴的聲明來(lái)確定, “事實(shí)”不應(yīng)當(dāng)是訴訟標(biāo)的的構(gòu)成要素。訴訟標(biāo)的識(shí)別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的構(gòu)成要素不必然是訴訟標(biāo)的的構(gòu)成要素,這兩者是可以分離開(kāi)來(lái)的。在以上深入分析和論證的基礎(chǔ)上,筆者指出在訴訟標(biāo)的為原告的訴的聲明的前提下,訴訟標(biāo)的的識(shí)別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)有兩個(gè)構(gòu)成要素,即訴的聲明和事實(shí)。如果僅僅依照訴的聲明這一項(xiàng)要素就可以達(dá)到識(shí)別訴訟標(biāo)的的效果,那么就沒(méi)有必要引入事實(shí)要素。而如果在單純依靠訴的聲明這一項(xiàng)要素難以識(shí)別訴訟標(biāo)的時(shí),我們就可以將“事實(shí)”這一要素引入,通過(guò)事實(shí)和訴的聲明兩項(xiàng)要素一起對(duì)訴訟標(biāo)的進(jìn)行識(shí)別。在文章的最后,在重構(gòu)的訴訟標(biāo)的及其識(shí)別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)理論之下筆者重新對(duì)訴訟標(biāo)的的機(jī)能進(jìn)行了完善。具體來(lái)說(shuō),本文主要由四部分組成。第一部分,鑒于目前學(xué)界對(duì)訴訟標(biāo)的機(jī)能的研究甚少,所以筆者在此部分通過(guò)理論和實(shí)踐兩個(gè)層面分析了研究訴訟標(biāo)的機(jī)能的意義。第二部分是對(duì)訴訟標(biāo)的機(jī)能的具體展開(kāi),主要從訴的變更、訴的合并、既判力的客觀范圍和重復(fù)訴訟的認(rèn)定四個(gè)方面深入、系統(tǒng)地分析了訴訟標(biāo)的的機(jī)能。文章的第三部分主要對(duì)訴訟標(biāo)的機(jī)能在我國(guó)民事訴訟中的具體體現(xiàn)進(jìn)行了概括和分析,從而指出問(wèn)題之所在。第四部分為本文的結(jié)論部分,在前三部分的基礎(chǔ)上提出了筆者對(duì)訴訟標(biāo)的及其識(shí)別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)理論的重構(gòu)設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:The theory of object of action is one of the basic theories of civil procedural law. Most researches on the theory of object of action have been mainly focused on the theory of identifying standard of object of action for a long time. At present, there is no deep research on the influence of the subject of litigation theory on other civil litigation theories in the field of civil procedural law, and the theory of the object of action has an important theoretical status in the field of civil procedural law. It is inextricably related to the important role and influence of the subject matter theory on other theories of civil action. It can be said that it is the backbone of civil procedural law. The author regards the function of the subject matter of civil action as a new theoretical point of view. In this paper, the systematic analysis and empirical analysis are used to deeply analyze the changes of litigation, the merger of litigation, the objective scope of res judicata and the role and influence of repeated litigation in various theories of subject matter of litigation. It further studies the function of the object of action in our country's civil litigation, and then points out the shortcomings of the related problems in the legislation and judicature of our country's civil litigation in the specific operation. On this basis, the author reconstructs the definition of litigation object and the theory of identification standard, and puts forward the viewpoint of reconstructing the theory of object of action under the premise of unified theory of concept of object of action and negation of standard of unified identification of object of action. As to the meaning of the object of action, the author adopts the point of view that the subject matter of the lawsuit is the abstract legal effect advocated in the statement of the plaintiff's action. Therefore, the content of the subject matter of the action should be determined by the statement of the plaintiff's action, and "fact" should not be the constituent element of the subject matter of the lawsuit. The constituent elements of the standard of identifying the object of litigation are not necessarily the constituent elements of the object of action, which can be separated. On the basis of the above deep analysis and argumentation, the author points out that under the premise that the subject matter of the lawsuit is the plaintiff's claim, there are two constituent elements in the identification standard of the litigation object, that is, the statement of action and the fact. If only according to the statement of action this element can achieve the effect of identifying the object of the action, then there is no need to introduce the element of fact. If it is difficult to identify the object of the lawsuit by relying solely on the declaration of action, we can introduce the element of "fact" and identify the object of the lawsuit through the two elements of the statement of fact and action. At the end of the article, the author reperfects the function of litigation object under the reconstructed litigation object and its identification standard theory. Specifically, this paper consists of four parts. In the first part, in view of the lack of academic research on the function of the object of litigation, the author analyzes the significance of the study of the function of the object of litigation through the theoretical and practical aspects. The second part is the specific development of the function of the object of litigation, mainly from the changes of litigation, the merger of litigation, the objective scope of res judicata and the identification of repeated litigation, systematically analyzes the function of the object of litigation. The third part summarizes and analyzes the function of the object of action in civil litigation in China, and points out the problem. The fourth part is the conclusion of this paper. On the basis of the first three parts, the author proposes the reconstruction of the litigation object and its identification standard theory.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 李紀(jì)森;;從訴訟標(biāo)的理論出發(fā)談訴的合并問(wèn)題[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2008年12期

2 江偉,肖建國(guó);論既判力的客觀范圍[J];法學(xué)研究;1996年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1897588