發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-23 04:00

  本文選題：實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師　切入點(diǎn)：醫(yī)療行為　出處：《南京大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：醫(yī)療行業(yè)因其本身具有高度的專業(yè)性和風(fēng)險(xiǎn)性,對(duì)從事醫(yī)療行業(yè)的醫(yī)務(wù)人員有著更加嚴(yán)格的專業(yè)要求。然而,醫(yī)務(wù)人員的培養(yǎng)是一個(gè)循序漸進(jìn)的過程,在取得正式的執(zhí)業(yè)資格之前,實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師是任何一名合格的執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師都必須經(jīng)歷的階段。實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師雖在醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)工作,因其未取得執(zhí)業(yè)資格不能獨(dú)立實(shí)施醫(yī)療行為,但可以在執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師的指導(dǎo)下實(shí)施醫(yī)療行為,從而積累臨床經(jīng)驗(yàn)。實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師身份的特殊性使其無法完全履行醫(yī)師的職責(zé)。實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師具有身份上的模糊性,就診人員無法準(zhǔn)確知悉實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師與執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師的不同,從而造成實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī)的現(xiàn)象時(shí)有發(fā)生。我國目前還未有專門的法律對(duì)實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī)進(jìn)行法律規(guī)制,在實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī)造成就診人損害發(fā)生后,實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師因主體身份的特殊性無法一概認(rèn)定為醫(yī)療侵權(quán)也不能全以非法行醫(yī)造成損害加以法律規(guī)制根據(jù)法律規(guī)定。實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師不得獨(dú)立實(shí)施醫(yī)療行為,其所有醫(yī)療行為需在執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師的指導(dǎo)監(jiān)督下方可進(jìn)行。實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師作為執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師培養(yǎng)的必經(jīng)階段也可以在執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師指導(dǎo)下從事醫(yī)療行為,具有一定的專業(yè)素養(yǎng),但因其臨床經(jīng)驗(yàn)不夠,不足以取得執(zhí)業(yè)資格,故其無法完全履行執(zhí)業(yè)醫(yī)師義務(wù),對(duì)其違規(guī)行醫(yī)造成損害的,一般有兩種觀點(diǎn)：其一,以醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任加以規(guī)制；其二,以非法行醫(yī)行為加以規(guī)制。通過北大醫(yī)療事故一案看來,外界對(duì)實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī)行為存在認(rèn)識(shí)偏差,只要實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師造成損害結(jié)果發(fā)生的一概以非法行醫(yī)論之,然而事實(shí)并非如此。本文從臨床實(shí)際出發(fā),以實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī)為探討對(duì)象,在闡述了一般性的醫(yī)學(xué)概念后,主要從實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī)的責(zé)任認(rèn)定和責(zé)任承擔(dān)兩個(gè)主要方面對(duì)實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī)進(jìn)行侵權(quán)法上的分析論述,從而確定實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī)后法律責(zé)任的承擔(dān)。根據(jù)有無醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)授權(quán),實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī)一般有以下兩種情形：1.醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)授權(quán)下的實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī),2.無醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)授權(quán)實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師擅自違規(guī)行醫(yī)。雖然該兩種情形下對(duì)認(rèn)定實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī)造成損害的責(zé)任認(rèn)定并無實(shí)質(zhì)的區(qū)別,但在法律責(zé)任承擔(dān)上卻大有不同,前者是由醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)承擔(dān)損害賠償責(zé)任,而后者則是由實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師本人承擔(dān)損害賠償責(zé)任。只要責(zé)任主體確定,具體的責(zé)任承擔(dān)方式皆可按照相關(guān)法律規(guī)定加以確定,從而保障受害人的利益。本文撰寫的主要目的是為了分析實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師違規(guī)行醫(yī)現(xiàn)象產(chǎn)生的原因,從法律層面上找出相應(yīng)的對(duì)策,規(guī)范實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師的臨床培養(yǎng),逐漸減少甚至杜絕違規(guī)行醫(yī)現(xiàn)象的再發(fā)生；加強(qiáng)相關(guān)法制宣傳教育,提升廣大人民群眾對(duì)實(shí)習(xí)醫(yī)師培養(yǎng)的理解和認(rèn)同感,從而建立和諧的醫(yī)患關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:Because of its high degree of professionalism and risk, the medical industry has more stringent professional requirements for the medical personnel engaged in the medical profession. However, the training of medical personnel is a gradual and gradual process. Before obtaining a formal practice qualification, a trainee is a stage that any qualified medical practitioner must go through. Although the intern works in a medical institution, he or she cannot independently carry out a medical act because he is not qualified to practise. However, medical practice can be carried out under the guidance of a medical practitioner, thus accumulating clinical experience. The particularity of the identity of an intern makes him unable to fully perform his duties as a physician, and the intern has the ambiguity of identity. The doctor can not know exactly the difference between the intern and the medical practitioner, which results in the phenomenon that the intern violates the practice of medicine from time to time. At present, there is no special law to regulate the illegal practice of the intern in our country. After an intern who violates the practice of medical treatment causes damage to the doctor, Because of the particularity of the subject identity, interns can not always be recognized as medical tort, nor can they be completely regulated by the law as a result of damage caused by illegal medical practice, and according to the provisions of the law, interns are not allowed to carry out medical acts independently. All its medical activities can only be carried out under the guidance and supervision of the medical practitioner. Interns, as a necessary stage of training, can also engage in medical behavior under the guidance of the medical practitioner and have a certain degree of professional accomplishment. But because its clinical experience is not enough, not enough to obtain the profession qualification, therefore it is unable to fulfill the practice doctor's duty completely, causes the harm to its illegal practice medicine, generally has two kinds of viewpoint: first, with the medical treatment damage responsibility to regulate; second, According to the case of medical malpractice at Peking University, the outside world has a bias in understanding the illegal practice of medicine, so long as the result of injury caused by the intern is discussed as illegal practice. However, it is not the case. This article, based on the clinical practice, takes the practice of medical practice as the object of discussion, after expounding the general concept of medicine, Mainly from the two main aspects of the responsibility and responsibility of practicing medicine illegally, the author analyzes and discusses the tort law of the illegal practice of medical practice by interns. In order to determine the legal liability of interns after practicing medicine illegally. According to the authorization of medical institutions, There are generally two situations in which interns practice illegally under the authority of medical institutions. 2. No medical institution authorizes interns to practice medicine without authorization. There is no material difference between the determination of liability for damage caused by medical practice, However, the legal liability is quite different. The former is for the medical institution to bear the liability for damages, while the latter is for the intern himself to bear the liability for the damage. As long as the subject of the responsibility is determined, Specific ways of assuming responsibility can be determined in accordance with relevant laws and regulations to protect the interests of the victims. The main purpose of this article is to analyze the causes of the phenomenon of interns practicing medicine illegally. Find out the corresponding countermeasures from the legal level, standardize the clinical training of interns, gradually reduce or even eliminate the recurrence of illegal medical practice, strengthen the relevant legal publicity and education, To promote the understanding and identity of the masses of the masses on the training of interns, thus to establish a harmonious relationship between doctors and patients.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D922.16

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊立新;;醫(yī)療管理損害責(zé)任與法律適用[J];法學(xué)家;2012年03期

2 楊立新;;醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任構(gòu)成要件的具體判斷[J];法律適用;2012年04期

3 周維微;;侵權(quán)法上因果關(guān)系判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)論[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年08期

4 曲曉亭;;淺析醫(yī)療損害的侵權(quán)責(zé)任[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬);2011年05期

5 趙明鋼;賈澤明;張陽德;焦雅輝;馬旭東;張璐;;深化醫(yī)療衛(wèi)生體制改革,實(shí)施專科醫(yī)師培養(yǎng)與準(zhǔn)入制度[J];中國現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2010年22期

6 呂群蓉;;醫(yī)務(wù)人員醫(yī)療行為侵權(quán)歸責(zé)原則之評(píng)析[J];法律適用;2010年05期

7 張新寶;;侵權(quán)責(zé)任法立法:功能定位、利益平衡與制度構(gòu)建[J];中國人民大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

8 謝瑜;;案例分析:醫(yī)療侵權(quán)糾紛責(zé)任構(gòu)成與歸責(zé)原則[J];醫(yī)學(xué)與哲學(xué)(人文社會(huì)醫(yī)學(xué)版);2009年02期

9 葉金強(qiáng);;相當(dāng)因果關(guān)系理論的展開[J];中國法學(xué);2008年01期

10 王琳;種林;;論醫(yī)療損害賠償案件的責(zé)任主體和法律適用[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 王丹峰;論醫(yī)患糾紛中患者權(quán)利及其保護(hù)[D];中國政法大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 吳克亮;醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任構(gòu)成要件研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2012年

2 胡露予;醫(yī)療損害賠償中的替代責(zé)任[D];云南大學(xué);2012年

3 馬旭之;非法行醫(yī)法律適用問題研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2011年

4 楊丹荔;我國醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任歸責(zé)原則研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

5 李琳玲;醫(yī)療損害侵權(quán)責(zé)任研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

6 馮楊勇;侵權(quán)責(zé)任免責(zé)事由研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1651770