發(fā)布時間：2018-03-23 14:43

  本文選題：代孕　切入點：有限開放　出處：《寧夏大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著人工生殖技術的成熟,作為其衍生物之一的代孕逐漸走入人們的視野,一方面它能保障特殊群體的生育權,實現其為人父母的心愿,另一方面,也引發(fā)了一系列爭議,使人類社會的發(fā)展面臨嚴峻的考驗。對于代孕,究竟是禁止還是開放?世界各國和地區(qū)基于其不同政治、經濟、文化、社會背景做出了不同的選擇,但總結其規(guī)律,發(fā)現各國和地區(qū)對代孕的立法態(tài)度并不是一成不變,而是隨著人民思想觀念、社會發(fā)展和政府態(tài)度的變化而變化。我國法律是明令禁止代孕的,但現實情況是,代孕不但沒能被禁止,反而轉為地下,形成了規(guī)模龐大的地下產業(yè)鏈,當事人的權益不但無法保障,在受到侵害時,也得不到救濟。本文認為,一方面,無論從中國傳統(tǒng)倫理道德觀念還是維護家庭健全的角度考量,代孕都有其合法合理性;另一方面,通過借鑒其他國家和地區(qū)的經驗發(fā)現,只堵不疏并不是長久之計,況且,一個制度在不能適應社會發(fā)展,滿足社會正當需求的時候,做出調整是其必然的選擇。本文認為,代孕不能“一刀切”的禁止,對于真正有需要的特殊群體、弱勢群體,法律應考慮到其需要,對其有限制的開放,使其親情得以寄托,血脈得以傳承。我國應順應社會的發(fā)展和需要,對代孕技術客觀的看待、理性的引導、科學的使用,并結合國情,在倫理道德、法律原則、基本人權和社會接納程度之間尋找一個平衡點,盡可能的發(fā)揮代孕的積極作用,為代孕這個涉及多方利益、多重爭議的問題設計一套操作性強的法律規(guī)制,確保代孕技術的健康發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the maturity of artificial reproduction technology, surrogacy, as one of its derivatives, has gradually come into people's view. On the one hand, it can protect the reproductive rights of special groups and realize their desire to be parents. On the other hand, it has also triggered a series of disputes. The development of human society is faced with a severe test. For surrogacy, is it forbidden or open? Countries and regions in the world have made different choices on the basis of their different political, economic, cultural and social backgrounds. However, by summing up their laws, it is found that the legislative attitude of countries and regions towards surrogacy is not static, but with the people's ideas and ideas. Social development and changes in the attitude of the government. The law of our country explicitly prohibits surrogacy, but the reality is that surrogacy has not been banned, but turned underground, forming a huge underground industrial chain. Not only the rights and interests of the parties can not be protected, nor can they be remedied when they are infringed. On the one hand, the surrogacy has its legal rationality, whether from the point of view of Chinese traditional ethics or maintaining the integrity of the family; On the other hand, by learning from the experience of other countries and regions, we have found that it is not a long-term solution to only stop the problem. Moreover, when a system cannot adapt to social development and meet the legitimate needs of society, This article holds that surrogacy cannot be prohibited in a one-size-fits-all manner. For special groups and vulnerable groups in real need, the law should take into account their needs, have a limited opening to them, so that their family feelings can be entrusted. Our country should conform to the development and need of the society, treat surrogacy technology objectively, guide rationally, use scientifically, combine with national conditions, in ethics, law principle, To find a balance between basic human rights and social acceptance, to play a positive role in surrogacy as far as possible, and to design a set of operational legal regulations for surrogacy, which involves various interests and disputes. Ensure the healthy development of surrogate technology.
【學位授予單位】：寧夏大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.16

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 侯衛(wèi)青;;代孕子女監(jiān)護權糾紛中的利益衡量及法律路徑選擇——以全國首例代孕子女監(jiān)護權糾紛案為例[J];青少年犯罪問題;2017年01期

2 高艷莉;;論代孕生育權[J];鄭州航空工業(yè)管理學院學報(社會科學版);2015年01期

3 任巍;;論完全代孕中子女身份歸屬的法律認定——從“子女最佳利益”原則出發(fā)[J];學術探索;2014年08期

4 周平;;有限開放代孕之法理分析與制度構建[J];甘肅社會科學;2011年03期

5 劉春園;;相關部門法缺位狀態(tài)下的刑事司法判斷——以一起基因代孕案件為視角[J];中國刑事法雜志;2011年05期

6 王貴松;;中國代孕規(guī)制的模式選擇[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2009年04期

7 楊芳;張昕;潘榮華;;臺灣地區(qū)“代孕”立法最新進展及其啟示[J];醫(yī)學與哲學(人文社會醫(yī)學版);2008年04期

8 張翔;基本權利的雙重性質[J];法學研究;2005年03期

9 胡寶珍;人工生殖的父母子女關系研究[J];云南大學學報(法學版);2004年05期

10 張國安;基因技術干預人類生殖的現狀、問題和對策[J];科技進步與對策;2002年10期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 康茜;代孕關系的法律調整問題研究[D];西南政法大學;2011年

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 張曉雪;代孕輔助生育法律問題研究[D];吉林大學;2014年

2 施振君;代孕行為的法律分析[D];沈陽師范大學;2013年

3 李等等;代孕的倫理問題及評價[D];廣州中醫(yī)藥大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1653912