食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)的民事責(zé)任研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-25 19:41
【摘要】：近幾年來,食品安全事故層出不窮,引發(fā)了世界各國的關(guān)注,而食品安全事故之所以頻發(fā),與我國食品行業(yè)現(xiàn)狀有重大關(guān)系,這就對食品行業(yè)的監(jiān)管提出了更大的挑戰(zhàn)。食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)是食品行業(yè)監(jiān)管的重要組成部分,認(rèn)證作為權(quán)威的、中立的第三方認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu),在我國承擔(dān)著重要的監(jiān)督職能。通過食品認(rèn)證,可以加強(qiáng)對食品安全的監(jiān)管,提升食品質(zhì)量,通過產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量,確保消費(fèi)者的生命健康。然而,我國法律對食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)的監(jiān)督多從行政或刑事方面進(jìn)行規(guī)制,民事責(zé)任方面的規(guī)定明顯不足,即便有規(guī)定,民事責(zé)任適用也沒有一個(gè)完整的體系。因此,我們要重視食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)的民事責(zé)任制度。本文圍繞著食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)的民事責(zé)任研究這一主題,從我國食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)現(xiàn)在的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r以及所存在的問題來看,通過對食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)違約和侵權(quán)責(zé)任的分析,研究食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)應(yīng)該承擔(dān)什么責(zé)任以及怎樣承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任問題。本文總共有四個(gè)部分,全文分三萬余字：本文第一部分研究食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)民事責(zé)任承擔(dān)的必要性,即為什么要承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任,從理論與實(shí)踐兩方面進(jìn)行分析。食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)為適格的民事責(zé)任承擔(dān)主體,有承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任的理論基礎(chǔ)；從實(shí)踐來說,食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)的職能是對食品進(jìn)行認(rèn)證活動(dòng),有義務(wù)依照誠實(shí)信用原則,保證認(rèn)證的真實(shí)性。但是很多食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)存在不作為現(xiàn)象,不能很好的履行自己的義務(wù),使許多食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)形同虛設(shè)。所以,法律對食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)進(jìn)行民事處罰,來維護(hù)消費(fèi)者的權(quán)益是十分必要的。本文第二部分分析食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)對生產(chǎn)者承擔(dān)的民事責(zé)任問題,即承擔(dān)什么民事責(zé)任。從生產(chǎn)者的角度進(jìn)行考慮,分析違約和侵權(quán)責(zé)任的承擔(dān)。違約責(zé)任是食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)與生產(chǎn)者之間簽訂了合同,理論界關(guān)于合同的性質(zhì)有不同的理解。筆者認(rèn)為食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)與生產(chǎn)者之間存在的是服務(wù)合同,在合同的基礎(chǔ)上,食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)對生產(chǎn)者應(yīng)該承擔(dān)違約責(zé)任；食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)對生產(chǎn)者的侵權(quán)行為比較少見,但也有相應(yīng)體現(xiàn),本文也作了簡單的概述。本文第三部分研究食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)對消費(fèi)者的違約和侵權(quán)責(zé)任,這是本文說討論的重點(diǎn)。關(guān)于這一點(diǎn)很少有學(xué)者涉及到,筆者同意食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)對消費(fèi)者承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任。下文對食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則、構(gòu)成要件以及責(zé)任形態(tài)一一進(jìn)了闡述。本文第四部分分析了食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)怎樣承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任的問題。第一節(jié)討論了相對于行政和刑事責(zé)任,食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)應(yīng)承擔(dān)民事責(zé)任；第二、三節(jié)廣泛來說可以從實(shí)體和程序兩方面分析,筆者對與一般侵權(quán)相同的部分沒有進(jìn)行闡述,而是針對食品認(rèn)證機(jī)構(gòu)特殊的責(zé)任賠償與消費(fèi)者公益訴訟進(jìn)行了簡要的討論。
[Abstract]:In recent years, food safety accidents have come out in an endless stream, which has aroused the attention of all countries in the world. And the frequent occurrence of food safety accidents has a great relationship with the status of the food industry in China, which poses a greater challenge to the supervision of the food industry. The food certification body is an important part of the food industry supervision, and the certification is an authoritative and neutral system. The third party certification bodies have an important supervisory function in our country. Through food certification, we can strengthen the supervision of food safety, improve the quality of food and ensure the life and health of consumers through the quality of the products. However, the supervision of the food certification bodies in our law is mainly regulated from the administrative or criminal aspects and civil liability. The provisions of the civil liability system are not a complete system. Therefore, we should attach importance to the civil liability system of the food certification bodies. This article focuses on the subject of the research on the civil liability of the food certification bodies, and the development of the food certification bodies in China and the existing problems. After the analysis of the liability for breach of contract and the liability for infringement of food certification bodies, the paper studies what responsibility and how to bear civil liability for food certification bodies. There are four parts in this article. The full text is divided into three thousand words: the first part of this article is to study the necessity of the civil responsibility of the food certification body, that is, why the civil liability should be borne, From the two aspects of the theory and practice, the food certification body is the subject of the civil liability for the proper case and the theoretical basis for the civil liability. In practice, the function of the food certification body is to authenticate the food, and has the obligation to ensure the authenticity of the certification according to the principle of honesty and credit. But many food certification bodies In the second part of this paper, the second part analyzes the civil liability of the food certification bodies for the producers of the producers, that is, what people to undertake. Responsibility. Consider from the producer's point of view and analyze the liability for breach of contract and tort. The liability for breach of contract is a contract between the food certification body and the producer. The theoretical circle has a different understanding of the nature of the contract. I think the existence of a service contract between the food certification agency and the producer, on the basis of the contract, the food The certification body should bear the liability for breach of contract for the producers; the infringement of the producers by the food certification body is relatively rare, but it also has a brief overview. The third part of this paper studies the breach and tort liability of the food certification bodies to consumers. This is the focus of this discussion. The author agrees that the food certification body is responsible for the infringement of the consumer. The following principles, the elements and the form of responsibility of the tort liability of the food certification body are introduced. The fourth part of this article analyzes the problem of how the food certification bodies undertake civil liability. The first section discusses the relative to the administrative and criminal cases. Responsibility, food certification bodies should bear civil liability; the second, third section can be widely analyzed from two aspects of the entity and procedure. The author does not elaborate on the same part of the general tort, but briefly discusses the special liability compensation of the food certification body and the consumer public interest litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京化工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D922.16
本文編號：2144871
[Abstract]:In recent years, food safety accidents have come out in an endless stream, which has aroused the attention of all countries in the world. And the frequent occurrence of food safety accidents has a great relationship with the status of the food industry in China, which poses a greater challenge to the supervision of the food industry. The food certification body is an important part of the food industry supervision, and the certification is an authoritative and neutral system. The third party certification bodies have an important supervisory function in our country. Through food certification, we can strengthen the supervision of food safety, improve the quality of food and ensure the life and health of consumers through the quality of the products. However, the supervision of the food certification bodies in our law is mainly regulated from the administrative or criminal aspects and civil liability. The provisions of the civil liability system are not a complete system. Therefore, we should attach importance to the civil liability system of the food certification bodies. This article focuses on the subject of the research on the civil liability of the food certification bodies, and the development of the food certification bodies in China and the existing problems. After the analysis of the liability for breach of contract and the liability for infringement of food certification bodies, the paper studies what responsibility and how to bear civil liability for food certification bodies. There are four parts in this article. The full text is divided into three thousand words: the first part of this article is to study the necessity of the civil responsibility of the food certification body, that is, why the civil liability should be borne, From the two aspects of the theory and practice, the food certification body is the subject of the civil liability for the proper case and the theoretical basis for the civil liability. In practice, the function of the food certification body is to authenticate the food, and has the obligation to ensure the authenticity of the certification according to the principle of honesty and credit. But many food certification bodies In the second part of this paper, the second part analyzes the civil liability of the food certification bodies for the producers of the producers, that is, what people to undertake. Responsibility. Consider from the producer's point of view and analyze the liability for breach of contract and tort. The liability for breach of contract is a contract between the food certification body and the producer. The theoretical circle has a different understanding of the nature of the contract. I think the existence of a service contract between the food certification agency and the producer, on the basis of the contract, the food The certification body should bear the liability for breach of contract for the producers; the infringement of the producers by the food certification body is relatively rare, but it also has a brief overview. The third part of this paper studies the breach and tort liability of the food certification bodies to consumers. This is the focus of this discussion. The author agrees that the food certification body is responsible for the infringement of the consumer. The following principles, the elements and the form of responsibility of the tort liability of the food certification body are introduced. The fourth part of this article analyzes the problem of how the food certification bodies undertake civil liability. The first section discusses the relative to the administrative and criminal cases. Responsibility, food certification bodies should bear civil liability; the second, third section can be widely analyzed from two aspects of the entity and procedure. The author does not elaborate on the same part of the general tort, but briefly discusses the special liability compensation of the food certification body and the consumer public interest litigation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京化工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D922.16
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 徐景波;;食品安全連帶責(zé)任制度的構(gòu)建[J];北方經(jīng)貿(mào);2014年02期
2 楊立新;;中國侵權(quán)行為形態(tài)與侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)法律適用指引——中國侵權(quán)責(zé)任法重述之侵權(quán)行為形態(tài)與侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)[J];河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年05期
3 楊立新;;論競合侵權(quán)行為[J];清華法學(xué);2013年01期
4 楊會;;共同侵權(quán)行為的新界定[J];西南石油大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2013年01期
，本文編號：2144871
本文鏈接：http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2144871.html
最近更新
教材專著
