發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-04-26 05:01

【摘要】：與"責(zé)令改正"類(lèi)似的表述在各類(lèi)規(guī)范性文件中大量出現(xiàn),通過(guò)對(duì)相關(guān)規(guī)范性文件和案例的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),"責(zé)令改正"存在概念、適用范圍和法律屬性的混亂,需要從理論和實(shí)踐進(jìn)行厘清。借用類(lèi)型化方法和哈特法律規(guī)則范式,對(duì)"責(zé)令改正"進(jìn)行理論分析,認(rèn)為相關(guān)的表述應(yīng)當(dāng)統(tǒng)一為"責(zé)令改正",其法律性質(zhì)應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)定為行政處罰,并嘗試構(gòu)建規(guī)范化的"責(zé)令改正"。
[Abstract]:A statement similar to "ordering correction" appears in large numbers in various normative documents. Through the study of relevant normative documents and cases, it is found that there is confusion in the concept, scope of application and legal attributes of "ordering correction". It needs to be clarified from theory and practice. With the help of typology and the paradigm of Hart's legal rules, this paper makes a theoretical analysis of "ordering correction", and holds that the relevant expressions should be unified as "ordering correction" and its legal nature should be regarded as an administrative punishment. And try to build a standardized "order correction".
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：2013年度司法部“法治建設(shè)與法學(xué)理論研究”課題:《精神病人實(shí)施的暴力案件中公安執(zhí)法研究》(13SFB5020)研究成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D922.1
，

本文編號(hào)：2465775