行政法上舉報(bào)人保護(hù)制度研究
[Abstract]:Under the national conditions of our country, the informant refers to the citizens, legal persons and other organizations who point to the relevant public power organs to report, report and expose the disciplinary, illegal and criminal acts of state organs and their functionaries. In the era of anti-corruption, emphasizing that reporting as an effective means of monitoring the exercise of public power is conducive to the smooth progress of the national anti-corruption cause. With regard to the protection of whistle-blowers, the acceptance of the report and the responsibility of the competent authority for the protection of the informant, in view of the irregularity of the exercise of public power at the present stage, The emphasis of the whistle-blower protection system in administrative law should be as follows: legal protection of whistle-blowers who expose the illegal exercise of public power and the legal regulation of the failure of public power organs to perform their protection obligations according to law; The main body of responsibility for protecting the whistle-blower is the public power organ, and the object of protection is the whistleblower's free right and the stable power order of the country. Compared with the protection of the whistleblower's administrative law, the judicial protection has been relatively perfect, so it is necessary to construct the whistle-blower protection system from the angle of administrative law. It is necessary to construct a two-way interactive protection system based on the protection of information, personal protection and right relief, and to promote the legal practice of the whistleblower protection system from the perspective of the whistle-blower and the protection organ.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D922.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 賴(lài)彩明;賴(lài)德亮;;加強(qiáng)公民舉報(bào)權(quán)的制度保障[J];法學(xué);2006年07期
2 王延波;;公職人員名譽(yù)權(quán)與言論自由沖突的憲法定位[J];西部法學(xué)評(píng)論;2010年02期
3 寧立成;;檢舉權(quán)的法理探析[J];河北法學(xué);2011年01期
4 王宏強(qiáng);論政治合法性的三個(gè)層面[J];中共濟(jì)南市委黨校濟(jì)南市行政學(xué)院濟(jì)南市社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年01期
5 王有強(qiáng);董紅;;完善我國(guó)舉報(bào)制度的幾點(diǎn)思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2005年11期
6 寧立成;;我國(guó)檢舉人權(quán)利保障制度的完善——美國(guó)“吹口哨人保護(hù)法”及其啟示[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年10期
7 李亮;公務(wù)員檢舉權(quán)的法律探討[J];陜西省行政學(xué)院.陜西省經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期
8 李建華;牛磊;;行政檢舉的基本問(wèn)題闡釋與合法性辯證[J];學(xué)海;2009年02期
9 陳江;中國(guó)舉報(bào)人的下落[J];中國(guó)新聞周刊;2005年25期
10 黃小波;;試論舉報(bào)答復(fù)行為的行政法屬性[J];行政法學(xué)研究;2007年04期
本文編號(hào):2465803
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2465803.html