發(fā)布時間：2018-03-10 13:49

  本文選題：供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟　切入點：知識共享　出處：《北京交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著科技和信息技術(shù)的高速發(fā)展,資本經(jīng)濟(jì)不再是經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展的主流,知識經(jīng)濟(jì)的主導(dǎo)地位越來越凸顯,成為企業(yè)競爭和可持續(xù)發(fā)展的重要資源,逐漸將此投入到管理理論和實踐當(dāng)中。隨著知識經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,組織之間的相互關(guān)系越來越密切,單個企業(yè)間的競爭逐步被弱化,而供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟間的競爭卻進(jìn)入到了白熱化狀態(tài),因此供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟的受重視程度逐步提高。知識逐漸成為供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟的戰(zhàn)略資源,將知識管理應(yīng)用到供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟上,可利用聯(lián)盟知識的優(yōu)勢互補(bǔ),增強(qiáng)企業(yè)的知識量和知識創(chuàng)新,提高企業(yè)的競爭力,更有效的應(yīng)對市場環(huán)境的快速變化。而供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享則是管理的核心內(nèi)容,但由于知識差異、聯(lián)盟特性以及聯(lián)盟合作效應(yīng)等多方因素的制約,使得供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享決策機(jī)制仍然存在較多弊端。因此深入探索供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享顯得十分重要。故本文從以下五方面,在博弈理論的基礎(chǔ)上,深入探索供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享決策:(1)本文從供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享的研究背景和意義出發(fā),通過對相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)綜述的概括總結(jié),明確本文的研究內(nèi)容、研究方法及技術(shù)路線。(2)明確本文研究內(nèi)容,給出相關(guān)理論概述,包括供應(yīng)鏈和供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟、知識和知識共享、供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享定義及特征、博弈理論概述、假設(shè)及研究方法、供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享中的博弈關(guān)系等。(3)本文明確構(gòu)建了影響供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享的三個維度因素——共享意愿、能力及知識特性,并明確指出對稱型、非對稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享的特點及相適應(yīng)的博弈模型。(4)在上述供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享類型的基礎(chǔ)上,分別提出對稱型和非對稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享的理論假設(shè)和影響因素,最終構(gòu)建出對稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享的演化博弈模型以及非對稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享博弈的斯塔克爾伯格博弈模型。(5)根據(jù)上述不同類型的博弈理論模型,得出對稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享演化博弈均衡結(jié)果以及非對稱型供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享斯坦克爾伯格博弈均衡結(jié)果,通過分析上述結(jié)果,明確不同類型的供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享決策的重要影響因素,然后給出相應(yīng)政策建議,最終對對稱和非對稱型進(jìn)行對比分析總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of science and technology and information technology, the capital economy is no longer the mainstream of economic development, and the leading position of knowledge economy is becoming more and more prominent, which has become an important resource for enterprise competition and sustainable development. With the development of knowledge economy, the relationship between organizations is getting closer and closer, the competition among individual enterprises is gradually weakened, but the competition among supply chain alliances has entered into a state of hyperthermia. Knowledge has gradually become the strategic resource of supply chain alliance. Applying knowledge management to supply chain alliance can make use of the complementary advantages of alliance knowledge and enhance the amount of knowledge and knowledge innovation of enterprises. In order to improve the competitiveness of enterprises and cope with the rapid change of market environment more effectively, knowledge sharing of supply chain alliance is the core content of management, but because of the knowledge difference, alliance characteristic and alliance cooperation effect, etc. Therefore, it is very important to explore the knowledge sharing of supply chain alliance in depth. Therefore, this paper based on the game theory from the following five aspects, Based on the background and significance of knowledge sharing in supply chain alliance, this paper makes clear the research content of this paper by summarizing the related literature. The research method and technical route. 2) make clear the research content of this paper, and give a summary of relevant theories, including supply chain and supply chain alliance, knowledge and knowledge sharing, definition and characteristics of supply chain alliance knowledge sharing, and game theory. Hypothesis and research method, game relation in knowledge sharing of supply chain alliance, etc.) this paper clearly constructs three dimension factors that affect knowledge sharing in supply chain alliance-sharing willingness, ability and knowledge characteristics, and points out the symmetry type. On the basis of the above types of knowledge sharing in supply chain alliances, the theoretical assumptions and influencing factors of knowledge sharing in symmetric and asymmetric supply chain alliances are put forward respectively. Finally, the evolutionary game model of knowledge sharing in symmetric supply chain alliance and Stackelberg game model of knowledge sharing game in asymmetric supply chain alliance are constructed. The results of knowledge sharing evolutionary game equilibrium of symmetric supply chain alliance and Stankelberg game equilibrium result of asymmetric supply chain alliance knowledge sharing are obtained. The important influencing factors of different types of supply chain alliance knowledge sharing decision are defined, and the corresponding policy recommendations are given. Finally, the symmetry and asymmetry types are compared and summarized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F274;F224.32

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 程鈞謨;王琪琪;宋美玲;朱振中;;基于成本收益的供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識共享重復(fù)博弈分析[J];統(tǒng)計與決策;2016年01期

2 王潔;;供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識共享的博弈分析[J];無錫商業(yè)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年05期

3 馮長利;李天鵬;蘭鷹;;意愿對供應(yīng)鏈知識共享影響的實證研究[J];管理評論;2013年03期

4 李新;王敏晰;;供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟知識共享的博弈分析[J];中國流通經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年10期

5 馮長利;周劍;蘭鷹;;供應(yīng)鏈成員間知識共享行為演化博弈模型[J];情報雜志;2012年03期

6 張旭梅;陳偉;張映秀;;供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識共享影響因素的實證研究[J];管理學(xué)報;2009年10期

7 呂大娥;朱常俊;;供應(yīng)鏈企業(yè)間知識共享的研究[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2008年30期

8 張堅;;企業(yè)技術(shù)聯(lián)盟中知識共享的影響因素分析[J];企業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年01期

9 任巖;;企業(yè)知識共享影響因素研究綜述[J];情報雜志;2006年10期

10 梁梁;王志強(qiáng);湯衛(wèi)君;熊立;;基于指派博弈的供應(yīng)鏈聯(lián)盟整體設(shè)計經(jīng)濟(jì)模型[J];中國科學(xué)技術(shù)大學(xué)學(xué)報;2005年06期

，

本文編號：1593615