發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-24 16:15

  本文選題：3PL新型物流金融服務(wù) + 資金約束　； 參考：《華中科技大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來，國內(nèi)外一些實(shí)力雄厚的第三方物流企業(yè)（以下簡稱3PL）開始為客戶提供一種新型的物流金融服務(wù)。作為一種物流與金融的創(chuàng)新，3PL物流金融服務(wù)無疑為3PL提供了一種新的利潤來源，但是，也存在一定的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)，比如客戶違約的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。因此，3PL對(duì)這一新興業(yè)務(wù)的開展需慎重。本文即研究了3PL新型物流金融服務(wù)的定價(jià)問題及開展金融服務(wù)對(duì)其自有資金的要求。 本研究基于經(jīng)典報(bào)童模型，首先研究了由供應(yīng)商和零售商組成的資金約束供應(yīng)鏈中，3PL分別采用：(1)固定物流服務(wù)費(fèi)率只決策金融服務(wù)收費(fèi)(現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中的常見做法);(2)物流服務(wù)與金融服務(wù)聯(lián)合決策時(shí),金融服務(wù)的定價(jià)問題。其次通過比較3PL傳統(tǒng)物流服務(wù)利潤與新型物流金融服務(wù)利潤，討論了3PL提供金融服務(wù)對(duì)其自有資金的要求，并做了相關(guān)參數(shù)分析。研究結(jié)果表明：與現(xiàn)實(shí)中3PL常用的固定物流服務(wù)費(fèi)率只決策金融服務(wù)收費(fèi)相比，聯(lián)合決策可增加3PL的利潤。當(dāng)3PL提供金融服務(wù)的資金成本足夠低時(shí)，提供金融服務(wù)對(duì)3PL自有資金無要求，即無論3PL自有資金多少都應(yīng)該提供金融服務(wù)。否則，只有3PL自有資金大于某一臨界值時(shí)才提供金融服務(wù)。同時(shí)對(duì)于自有資金不充足的3PL而言，其金融服務(wù)定價(jià)與自有資金無關(guān)，且由于物流金融服務(wù)的聯(lián)合效應(yīng)，3PL金融服務(wù)索取的最優(yōu)利率不一定高于3PL向銀行貸款的利率。因此，現(xiàn)實(shí)中，3PL可以通過以一較低的貸款利率吸引客戶，同時(shí)包攬下其物流服務(wù)，，收取一較高物流費(fèi)率以此來提高總利潤。
[Abstract]:In recent years, some strong third party logistics enterprises at home and abroad (hereinafter referred to as 3PLs) began to provide a new type of logistics financial services for customers. As an innovation of logistics and finance, logistics financial service undoubtedly provides a new profit source for 3PL, but there are also some risks, such as the risk of customer default. Therefore, 3 PL to this new business development needs to be cautious. This paper studies the pricing of 3PL new logistics financial services and the requirements of financial services for its own capital. This study is based on the classic newsboy model. First of all, the paper studies the decision of the fixed logistics service rate only for financial services (common practice in real life) in the capital constrained supply chain composed of suppliers and retailers, when the logistics service and financial services are jointly decided by 3PL (1: 1), which is a common practice in real life, in the joint decision of logistics service and financial service. Pricing of financial services Secondly, by comparing the profit of traditional logistics service of 3PL with the profit of new type of logistics financial service, this paper discusses the requirements of the financial services provided by 3PL to its own capital, and makes an analysis of the relevant parameters. The results show that, compared with the fixed logistics service rate commonly used in 3PL, the joint decision can increase the profit of 3PL. When the 3PL's cost of providing financial services is low enough, the provision of financial services does not require 3PL's own capital, that is, it should provide financial services regardless of the amount of the 3PL's own capital. Otherwise, financial services are provided only if 3PL's own capital exceeds a certain threshold. At the same time, for 3PL whose own capital is not sufficient, its financial service pricing has nothing to do with its own capital, and because of the combined effect of logistics financial services, the optimal interest rate demanded by financial services is not necessarily higher than that of 3PL's loans to banks. Therefore, in reality, 3PL can increase the total profit by attracting customers with a lower loan rate, at the same time taking over its logistics services and charging a higher logistics rate.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：F253.7;F831

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 任建標(biāo);陳慶偉;;考慮零售商延期付款的供應(yīng)鏈協(xié)調(diào)機(jī)制研究[J];工業(yè)工程與管理;2009年02期

2 徐鵬;王勇;楊金;;基于委托模式融通倉的銀行對(duì)第三方物流激勵(lì)和監(jiān)督[J];管理科學(xué);2008年01期

3 陳祥鋒;朱道立;應(yīng)雯s

本文編號(hào)：1929736