發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-16 05:20

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國(guó)信托公司競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)與比較研究　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 信托公司 競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)與比較研究 指標(biāo)體系

【摘要】：近年來(lái),隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷發(fā)展,國(guó)內(nèi)信托公司管理的信托資產(chǎn)規(guī)模的快速增長(zhǎng)。據(jù)Wind數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)統(tǒng)計(jì),截至2015年末,68家信托公司管理的信托資產(chǎn)規(guī)模為16.30萬(wàn)億元。使得信托行業(yè)一躍成為僅次于銀行業(yè)的第二大金融門(mén)類(lèi)。但是,隨著“泛資管”時(shí)代的到來(lái),證監(jiān)會(huì)、保監(jiān)會(huì)等監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)出臺(tái)的一系列新政放寬了對(duì)期貨、保險(xiǎn)、券商等金融機(jī)構(gòu)投資的范圍,其他“泛資產(chǎn)”管理機(jī)構(gòu)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)進(jìn)一步地加劇。與此同時(shí),在信托行業(yè)的內(nèi)部,不同信托公司之間為了搶占客戶(hù)資源和市場(chǎng)份額也紛紛展開(kāi)了激烈的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。因此,在當(dāng)前環(huán)境下,運(yùn)用相關(guān)的定量方法對(duì)信托公司的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),對(duì)于信托公司戰(zhàn)略的制定、競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的提升以及整個(gè)信托行業(yè)的健康穩(wěn)定發(fā)展具有重要的意義。本文從信托公司的資產(chǎn)管理能力、贏利能力、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理能力及成長(zhǎng)能力等因素出發(fā),設(shè)計(jì)一套四維度的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,對(duì)已披露年報(bào)信息的全國(guó)68家信托公司2015年度的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)性的綜合評(píng)價(jià)。從信托公司競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的綜合評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果看,華潤(rùn)信托、交銀信托、上海信托、平安信托、興業(yè)信托、華能信托、中海信托、建信信托、中信信托、重慶信托等10家信托公司的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力綜合得分較高,依次排在全國(guó)68家信托公司的前10位。通過(guò)信托公司之間綜合競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力和各項(xiàng)要素的橫向以及縱向?qū)Ρ确治隹傻玫揭韵聨�點(diǎn)結(jié)論：(一)在信托公司發(fā)展的初期,公司為了實(shí)現(xiàn)規(guī)模的快速擴(kuò)張,往往很難兼顧其他方面能力的均衡發(fā)展；(二)當(dāng)信托公司只是片面地追求規(guī)模的擴(kuò)張而沒(méi)有平衡其他各方面的能力發(fā)展時(shí),公司最終將為這種“粗放式的增長(zhǎng)”付出一定的代價(jià);(三)信托公司若要獲得持續(xù)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力優(yōu)勢(shì),就必須在各方面均衡發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous development of China's economy, the rapid growth of the domestic trust companies trust assets management scale. According to Wind database statistics, as of the end of 2015, 68 trust companies trust assets management scale of 16 trillion and 300 billion yuan. The trust industry has become only the second largest banking financial category. However, with the pan "the arrival of the era of information management, Securities Regulatory Commission, China Insurance Regulatory Commission issued a series of new regulatory agencies such as the relaxation of futures, insurance, brokerage and other financial institutions, investment scope, other" Pan asset management institutions competition further intensified. Meanwhile, in the trust industry, trust between different companies in order to seize the customer resources and market share have also launched a fierce competition. Therefore, in the current environment, were evaluated using quantitative methods related to the trust company's competitiveness, for public trust Our development strategy, has important significance to the healthy and stable development and enhance the competitiveness of the whole industry. This article from the trust trust asset management capabilities, profitability of risk management ability and growth ability and other factors, design a set of four dimensions of competitiveness evaluation index system, comprehensive evaluation system of disclosure annual report of the National Trust 68 2015 annual competition. From the comprehensive evaluation of the competitiveness of the trust company, Huarun trust, trust bank, Shanghai trust, Ping An Trust, industrial trust, Huaneng trust, Zhonghai trust, Jianxin trust, CITIC Trust, Chongqing trust 10 trust companies of the comprehensive competitiveness of higher scores in turn, row 68 trust companies in the country before 10. Through horizontal trust between comprehensive competitiveness and the elements and longitudinal comparative analysis can be obtained as follows Conclusion: (a) in the early stage of the development of trust company, in order to achieve rapid expansion of the scale, it is often difficult to balance other ability; (two) when the trust company just one-sided pursuit of scale expansion and not balanced development of other aspects of ability, company will end this "extensive growth of pay; (three) trust companies to obtain sustainable competitive advantage, it must be balanced development in all aspects.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F832.49

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 梁雅敏;;用層次分析法構(gòu)造信托公司定性評(píng)價(jià)模型[J];征信;2013年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1431714