發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-09 00:04

  本文選題：西部地區(qū)　切入點(diǎn)：產(chǎn)業(yè)抑制　出處：《西北大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：西部大開發(fā)以來,國家加大了對(duì)西部地區(qū)的投資和政策支持力度,西部地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)增速有明顯的提高。但和東部地區(qū)相比,差距并沒有縮小。尤其是西部地區(qū)的經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展仍然較多的依賴資源型行業(yè)的增長(zhǎng),人們預(yù)期的東西產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移也沒有大規(guī)模發(fā)生,產(chǎn)業(yè)整體發(fā)展演進(jìn)較為緩慢。本文即試圖尋找西部產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展滯后的原因,并提出解決思路。 就各國的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)來看,產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展有內(nèi)生和外生兩種主要模式。我國在改革開放前后分別實(shí)踐過這兩種模式,并取得了不同的經(jīng)濟(jì)績(jī)效。本文首先對(duì)我國的產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展歷程加以回顧,由歷史分析得出西部地區(qū)產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展困境的成因和各種表現(xiàn),并提出“產(chǎn)業(yè)抑制”這一概念來表征西部產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展滯后的狀態(tài)。 目前,東部地區(qū)以O(shè)EM為主的加工工業(yè)較多地依賴外商投資和國外市場(chǎng),使得東部地區(qū)長(zhǎng)期處于產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈低端,產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)的瓶頸效應(yīng)已經(jīng)非常明顯。對(duì)于西部地區(qū)而言,產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展不宜再簡(jiǎn)單復(fù)制東部的發(fā)展模式,而應(yīng)該注重提高自身產(chǎn)業(yè)的內(nèi)生發(fā)展能力。本文認(rèn)為,產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)生發(fā)展應(yīng)是以具有自生能力的本地企業(yè)為主體,以本地市場(chǎng)為依托,具備自我發(fā)展能力的產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展方式。產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)生發(fā)展應(yīng)以比較優(yōu)勢(shì)為起點(diǎn),以持續(xù)的知識(shí)創(chuàng)新和制度創(chuàng)新,推動(dòng)外生比較優(yōu)勢(shì)向內(nèi)生比較優(yōu)勢(shì)和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)轉(zhuǎn)化�；�于這一定義,本文建立了一個(gè)指標(biāo)體系,利用主成分分析法對(duì)我國各省份的產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)生發(fā)展能力進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),并對(duì)西部地區(qū)的評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果進(jìn)行重點(diǎn)分析。 由于西部地區(qū)的產(chǎn)業(yè)抑制是一種封閉的自我循環(huán)狀態(tài),靠?jī)?nèi)部力量很難突破這一體系。所以西部產(chǎn)業(yè)內(nèi)生發(fā)展機(jī)制的建立必須堅(jiān)持對(duì)外開放,依靠外力打破原有的均衡,以經(jīng)濟(jì)增量激活本地經(jīng)濟(jì)存量,構(gòu)建國內(nèi)價(jià)值鏈則是實(shí)現(xiàn)這一過程的可行思路。結(jié)合產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)、技術(shù)創(chuàng)新制度創(chuàng)新等方面的政策安排,西部地區(qū)方能逐步擺脫產(chǎn)業(yè)抑制的陷阱,實(shí)現(xiàn)產(chǎn)業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Since the development of the western region, the state has increased its investment and policy support to the western region, and the economic growth rate in the western region has increased significantly. But compared with the eastern region, The gap has not narrowed. In particular, the economic development in the western region is still more dependent on the growth of resource-based industries, and the expected transfer of east-west industries has not taken place on a large scale. The paper tries to find out the reason why the industrial development of western China lags behind, and puts forward some ideas to solve the problem. From the practical experience of various countries, there are two main modes of industrial development: endogenous and exogenous. China has practiced these two models before and after the reform and opening up. Firstly, this paper reviews the history of industrial development in China, and draws the causes and manifestations of the industrial development dilemma in the western region from the historical analysis. And put forward the concept of "industry inhibition" to characterize the state of industrial development lag in western China. At present, the processing industry in eastern China, which is dominated by OEM, relies more on foreign investment and foreign markets, which makes the eastern region in the low end of the industrial chain for a long time, and the bottleneck effect of industrial upgrading is very obvious. The industrial development should not simply copy the development model of the east, but should pay attention to improving the endogenous development ability of its own industry. This paper holds that the endogenous development of the industry should be based on the local enterprises with the ability of self-growth and the local market. The industrial development mode with self-development ability should take comparative advantage as the starting point and promote the transformation from exogenous comparative advantage to endogenous comparative advantage and competitive advantage with continuous knowledge innovation and institutional innovation. In this paper, an index system is set up to evaluate the endogenous development ability of industries in various provinces of China by using principal component analysis, and the evaluation results in western China are analyzed emphatically. Since the industrial repression in the western region is a closed self-circulation state, it is difficult to break through this system by internal forces. Therefore, the establishment of the endogenous development mechanism of the western industry must adhere to the opening up and rely on external forces to break the original equilibrium. Activating the local economic stock with economic increment and constructing the domestic value chain are the feasible ideas to realize this process. Combining with the policy arrangement of industrial structure, technological innovation and institutional innovation, the western region can gradually get rid of the trap of industrial restraint. To realize the sustainable development of industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F127

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 徐彰;張超;;產(chǎn)業(yè)革命、主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)的形成與政策選擇——基于英國、美國、日本工業(yè)化早期階段的經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[J];財(cái)政研究;2006年06期

2 丁祥生;張巖貴;;貿(mào)易戰(zhàn)略選擇:一般情形與大國情形[J];國際商務(wù)(對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2007年04期

3 劉訓(xùn)華;滕光進(jìn);;西部地區(qū)承接產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移的條件、路徑及其政策分析[J];中國發(fā)展觀察;2009年12期

4 劉志彪;張杰;;全球代工體系下發(fā)展中國家俘獲型網(wǎng)絡(luò)的形成、突破與對(duì)策——基于GVC與NVC的比較視角[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年05期

5 陳建軍;黃潔;陳國亮;;產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚間分工和地區(qū)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)——來自長(zhǎng)三角微觀數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年03期

6 張少軍;劉志彪;;全球價(jià)值鏈模式的產(chǎn)業(yè)轉(zhuǎn)移——?jiǎng)恿Α⒂绊懪c對(duì)中國產(chǎn)業(yè)升級(jí)和區(qū)域協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展的啟示[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年11期

7 張廣婷;江靜;陳勇;;中國勞動(dòng)力轉(zhuǎn)移與經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)的實(shí)證研究[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年10期

8 白永秀;吳振磊;;我國30年經(jīng)濟(jì)體制改革的歷史回顧與經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié)[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2008年11期

9 任曉紅;;內(nèi)生比較優(yōu)勢(shì)與我國西部地區(qū)可持續(xù)發(fā)展的主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2010年03期

10 郭克莎;對(duì)中國外貿(mào)戰(zhàn)略與貿(mào)易政策的評(píng)論[J];國際經(jīng)濟(jì)評(píng)論;2003年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1586113