發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-12-31 14:40

【摘要】：近幾十年來(lái)，隨著中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展，居民收入水平不斷提高，我國(guó)的收入分配差距也越來(lái)越大，不僅阻礙了經(jīng)濟(jì)的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展，也影響了社會(huì)的和諧穩(wěn)定。2013年2月發(fā)改委頒布了《深化改革收入分配制度若干意見的通知》，再次強(qiáng)調(diào)了調(diào)節(jié)收入分配差距的重要性和緊迫性。新形勢(shì)要求我們對(duì)收入分配調(diào)節(jié)方式進(jìn)行重大調(diào)整，以縮小收入差距進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大的趨勢(shì)，而稅制改革是經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)改革的突破口和先行軍，正是基于這種歷史使命，新一輪的稅制改革需要開啟。 本文的研究范疇是基于收入分配目標(biāo)的稅制結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化。目前，我國(guó)學(xué)者在研究方法上，大多側(cè)重于單個(gè)稅種的角度或者從稅系結(jié)構(gòu)的角度，利用實(shí)證或者理論分析，探索直接稅、間接稅或者某個(gè)稅種對(duì)收入分配公平的影響，缺乏對(duì)稅制結(jié)構(gòu)的宏觀把握。本文將利用整體到局部的均衡分析方法探索稅制結(jié)構(gòu)改革路徑，即從稅系結(jié)構(gòu)—稅種結(jié)構(gòu)—稅種要素結(jié)構(gòu)三方面層層推進(jìn)，并注重稅系之間、稅種之間的協(xié)調(diào)配合作用。 首先，本文梳理了稅制結(jié)構(gòu)影響收入分配的理論基礎(chǔ)：稅制結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)要素收入分配的初次調(diào)節(jié)以及對(duì)居民收入分配的再調(diào)節(jié)。然后，在我國(guó)收入分配差距現(xiàn)狀以及稅制結(jié)構(gòu)現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上，研究我國(guó)稅制結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)收入分配的調(diào)節(jié)作用，本文運(yùn)用協(xié)整回歸，以1999-2012年的直接稅、間接稅、類財(cái)產(chǎn)稅的數(shù)據(jù)資料為基礎(chǔ)，分析我國(guó)稅制結(jié)構(gòu)與收入分配指數(shù)的相關(guān)性并得出結(jié)論：直接稅對(duì)收入差距調(diào)節(jié)有促進(jìn)作用，但作用程度很��；間接稅對(duì)收入差距調(diào)節(jié)有反向擴(kuò)大作用；類財(cái)產(chǎn)稅因本身缺陷對(duì)收入調(diào)節(jié)并沒有發(fā)揮正向調(diào)節(jié)作用，反而有弱的反向擴(kuò)大作用。接下來(lái)，本文在理論層面的分析基礎(chǔ)上，通過(guò)實(shí)證分析總結(jié)得出現(xiàn)行稅制體系在收入調(diào)節(jié)功能上存在的問(wèn)題，包括主體稅種結(jié)構(gòu)失衡、所得稅調(diào)節(jié)作用受限、財(cái)產(chǎn)稅體系缺位以及稅種間缺少必要的協(xié)調(diào)作用。最后，在公平、整體優(yōu)化以及稅種協(xié)調(diào)的優(yōu)化目標(biāo)下，探索縮小收入分配差距的稅制結(jié)構(gòu)優(yōu)化路徑：稅系結(jié)構(gòu)上，構(gòu)建有利于收入分配的稅制結(jié)構(gòu)模式，合理配置直接稅和間接稅的比例；稅種結(jié)構(gòu)上，加大個(gè)稅比重，，降低增值稅比重，主張開征遺產(chǎn)稅和贈(zèng)與稅，充實(shí)財(cái)產(chǎn)稅體系；稅種要素結(jié)構(gòu)上，重點(diǎn)完善個(gè)人所得稅、房產(chǎn)稅、遺產(chǎn)稅和贈(zèng)與稅；稅種協(xié)調(diào)上，深化有利于收入分配的結(jié)構(gòu)性減稅政策。
[Abstract]:In recent decades, with the rapid development of the Chinese economy, the income level of the residents has been constantly rising, and the income distribution gap in our country has become wider and larger, which not only hinders the further development of the economy. In February 2013, the National Development and Reform Commission promulgated the notice of some opinions on deepening the Reform of the income Distribution system, emphasizing once again the importance and urgency of adjusting the income distribution gap. The new situation requires us to make major adjustments to the mode of adjustment of income distribution in order to narrow the trend of further widening of the income gap, and the tax reform is the breakthrough point and the leading force in economic and social reform, which is precisely based on this historical mission. A new round of tax reform needs to be launched. The scope of this paper is the optimization of tax system structure based on income distribution goal. At present, most of our scholars focus on the perspective of individual taxes or from the perspective of the structure of tax departments, using empirical or theoretical analysis to explore the impact of direct tax, indirect tax or a certain tax on income distribution fairness. Lack of macro grasp of the structure of the tax system. This paper will explore the reform path of tax system structure by using the equilibrium analysis method of whole to part, that is, to push forward from three aspects of tax system structure and tax element structure, and pay attention to the coordination and coordination between tax departments and taxes. First of all, this paper combs the theoretical basis of the tax structure affecting income distribution: the first adjustment of the tax structure to the distribution of factor income and the re-regulation of the income distribution of residents. Then, on the basis of the current situation of the income distribution gap and the present situation of the tax system structure, this paper studies the adjustment effect of the tax system structure on the income distribution in our country. This paper uses cointegration regression to analyze the direct tax and indirect tax from 1999 to 2012. Based on the data of property tax, this paper analyzes the correlation between tax system structure and income distribution index in China and draws the conclusion: direct tax can promote the adjustment of income gap, but to a very small extent; Indirect tax has a reverse effect on the adjustment of income gap, and property tax has not played a positive role in regulating income because of its own defects, but has a weak function of reverse expansion. Then, on the basis of theoretical analysis and empirical analysis, this paper concludes the existing problems in the function of income regulation in the current tax system, including the imbalance of the structure of the main tax categories, the limitation of the role of income tax regulation. The absence of property tax system and the lack of necessary coordination between taxes. Finally, under the objective of equity, overall optimization and tax coordination, this paper explores the optimal path of reducing the income distribution gap: the structure of tax system, the construction of a favorable tax structure model of income distribution. Reasonable allocation of direct and indirect taxes; In the structure of tax, we should increase the proportion of personal tax, reduce the proportion of value-added tax, advocate levying inheritance tax and gift tax, enrich the property tax system, improve the structure of tax elements, focus on perfecting personal income tax, real estate tax, estate tax and gift tax. In terms of tax coordination, we should deepen the structural tax reduction policies that are conducive to income distribution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：F812.42;F126.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李實(shí);羅楚亮;;中國(guó)城鄉(xiāng)居民收入差距的重新估計(jì)[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年02期

2 劉佐;關(guān)于目前中國(guó)開征遺產(chǎn)稅問(wèn)題的一些不同看法[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2003年10期

3 張陽(yáng);;中國(guó)稅收負(fù)擔(dān)分布的實(shí)證分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年06期

4 沈玉平;劉穎;;設(shè)計(jì)個(gè)人所得稅免征額的制度框架和技術(shù)路徑研究[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2008年09期

5 劉怡;聶海峰;;增值稅和營(yíng)業(yè)稅對(duì)收入分配的不同影響研究[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年06期

6 王喬;汪柱旺;;我國(guó)現(xiàn)行稅制結(jié)構(gòu)影響居民收入分配差距的實(shí)證分析[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2008年02期

7 周建軍,王韜,劉芳;間接稅改革的宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng):一般均衡分析[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2004年05期

8 李林木;;綜合與分類相結(jié)合的個(gè)稅改革:半二元模式的選擇與征管[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年07期

9 聞媛;;我國(guó)稅制結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)居民收入分配影響的分析與思考[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2009年04期

10 王小魯,樊綱;中國(guó)地區(qū)差距的變動(dòng)趨勢(shì)和影響因素[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2004年01期

本文編號(hào)：2396723