發(fā)布時間：2019-01-11 12:50

【摘要】：隨著我國改革開放成果日益顯著，經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力呈較快增長趨勢，但是同時暴露出來的環(huán)境風(fēng)險問題也明顯增多這種環(huán)境風(fēng)險背后所折射出的社會問題不僅有損公眾自身的利益，也給政府的環(huán)境風(fēng)險管理帶來困難因此，對于公眾環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知的研究也日益增多；然而傳統(tǒng)的環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知研究割裂了個體認(rèn)知與情感的關(guān)系，僅從單一視角去分析環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知的心理機(jī)理，而且建立的量化模型僅僅是關(guān)乎環(huán)境風(fēng)險結(jié)果與概率的分析，缺少個體主觀因素的綜合考量，因而不能全面反映公眾環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知過程 本研究即是在這樣的背景下以個體的環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知為研究對象，將環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知研究拆分成環(huán)境風(fēng)險認(rèn)知評價與環(huán)境風(fēng)險行為決策這兩個部分，分別定性定量的考察個體環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知的內(nèi)在機(jī)制環(huán)境風(fēng)險認(rèn)知評價研究主要是從認(rèn)知與情感雙視角出發(fā)，引入心理學(xué)中評價理論，在傳統(tǒng)評價理論的基礎(chǔ)上加入情緒狀態(tài)變量，建立新的認(rèn)知評價模型，揭示個體認(rèn)知評價透過影響即時情緒進(jìn)而決定個體行為傾向的內(nèi)在機(jī)理在前景理論的基礎(chǔ)上選擇建立新的環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知量化模型，定量化的描述個體環(huán)境風(fēng)險行為決策，通過非線性最小二乘擬合出模型的參數(shù)，觀察不同環(huán)境風(fēng)險態(tài)度下模型參數(shù)的變化，，根據(jù)模型擬合結(jié)果考察新模型的適用性，并將設(shè)計的經(jīng)濟(jì)損失與道德倫理兩種情境下的結(jié)果進(jìn)行比較，通過結(jié)合環(huán)境風(fēng)險認(rèn)知評價部分結(jié)論，綜合分析認(rèn)知評價與情緒體驗(yàn)對于個體環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知的影響，彌補(bǔ)量化模型缺失的對于個體主觀因素的考量，更加全面地描繪出個體環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知的內(nèi)在過程 本研究從個體的認(rèn)知與情感視角出發(fā)，通過建立的認(rèn)知評價模型與行為決策模型定性定量的分析了個體環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)心理學(xué)基礎(chǔ)對于公眾來說，提供了一個細(xì)致分析自身環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知的途徑，減少公眾在面對環(huán)境風(fēng)險事件的不必要恐慌乃至更多不合理的有損自身利益的行為；而且本研究的相關(guān)結(jié)論還給政府環(huán)境風(fēng)險管理與社會管理部門提供了政策制定提供參考，進(jìn)而更進(jìn)一步的促進(jìn)公眾采取合理的環(huán)境風(fēng)險應(yīng)對行為
[Abstract]:With the increasingly remarkable achievements of reform and opening up in China, the economic strength is increasing rapidly, but the environmental risks exposed at the same time are also obviously increasing. The social problems reflected behind the environmental risks are not only harmful to the interests of the public, but also to the interests of the public. It also brings difficulties to the government's environmental risk management. Therefore, the research on public environmental risk awareness is increasing day by day. However, the traditional study of environmental risk perception separates the relationship between individual cognition and emotion, and only analyzes the psychological mechanism of environmental risk perception from a single perspective, and the established quantitative model is only related to the analysis of the results and probability of environmental risk. Due to the lack of comprehensive consideration of individual subjective factors, this study can not fully reflect the process of public environmental risk perception. This study takes individual environmental risk perception as the research object under such a background. The research on environmental risk perception is divided into two parts: environmental risk cognition evaluation and environmental risk behavior decision-making. The qualitative and quantitative study on the intrinsic mechanism of individual environmental risk perception is mainly from the perspective of cognition and emotion, and introduces the theory of evaluation in psychology. On the basis of traditional evaluation theory, a new cognitive evaluation model is established by adding emotional state variables. It is revealed that the internal mechanism of individual cognitive evaluation determines individual behavior tendency through influencing immediate emotion. On the basis of foreground theory, a new quantitative model of environmental risk perception is established to quantitatively describe individual environmental risk behavior decision-making. The parameters of the model were fitted by nonlinear least squares, and the changes of model parameters under different environmental risk attitudes were observed. The applicability of the new model was investigated according to the fitting results of the model. By comparing the results of the two situations of economic loss and moral ethics, combined with some conclusions of cognitive evaluation of environmental risk, this paper comprehensively analyzes the impact of cognitive evaluation and emotional experience on individual perception of environmental risk. To make up for the lack of quantitative model for the consideration of individual subjective factors, a more comprehensive description of the individual environmental risk perception of the internal process of this study from the individual cognitive and emotional perspective, Through the establishment of cognitive evaluation model and behavioral decision-making model qualitative and quantitative analysis of the individual environmental risk perception of economic psychology foundation for the public to provide a detailed analysis of their own environmental risk perception approach. Reduce the public in the face of environmental risks in the event of unnecessary panic and even more unreasonable acts detrimental to their own interests; Moreover, the relevant conclusions of this study also provide a reference for government environmental risk management and social management departments to formulate policies, and further promote the public to adopt reasonable environmental risk response behavior.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：X820.4;F124

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魏科技;宋永會;彭劍峰;袁鵬;溫麗麗;王毅力;;環(huán)境風(fēng)險源及其分類方法研究[J];安全與環(huán)境學(xué)報;2010年01期

2 盧靜;孫寧;夏建新;侯貴光;;中國環(huán)境風(fēng)險現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展趨勢分析[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)與管理;2012年01期

3 佘升翔;馬超群;陸強(qiáng);謝筱玲;;環(huán)境風(fēng)險溝通的心理距離模型[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2012年09期

4 林狀;彭民;;非期望效用理論的發(fā)展歷程評述[J];企業(yè)技術(shù)開發(fā);2009年07期

5 佘升翔;陸強(qiáng);;個體如何貼現(xiàn)環(huán)境風(fēng)險?——模型與政策涵義[J];生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年02期

6 佘升翔;陸強(qiáng);;環(huán)境風(fēng)險知覺和評價的整體框架[J];生態(tài)環(huán)境學(xué)報;2010年07期

7 于清源;謝曉非;;環(huán)境中的風(fēng)險認(rèn)知特征[J];心理科學(xué);2006年02期

8 王建平,林文娟,陳仲庚,崔俊南,劉杰;簡明心境量表(POMS)在中國的試用報告[J];心理學(xué)報;2000年01期

9 王建平,林文娟,梁耀堅(jiān),藺秀云;應(yīng)對策略在癌癥患者心理干預(yù)中的中介作用[J];中國臨床心理學(xué)雜志;2003年01期

10 張海燕;葛怡;李鳳英;楊潔;畢軍;;環(huán)境風(fēng)險感知的心理測量范式研究述評[J];自然災(zāi)害學(xué)報;2010年01期

本文編號：2407152