中國(guó)跨國(guó)并購(gòu)逆向技術(shù)溢出對(duì)技術(shù)進(jìn)步影響的研究
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid economic development of our country, the activities of foreign direct investment also rise. As an important way of foreign direct investment, transnational M & A (M & A) is increasing in quantity and amount. After the financial crisis, the amount of cross-border M & A (M & A) reached $16319 million, which began to shrink. In 2011, China realized $5934 million of cross-border M & A (M & A). Although China has made some achievements in the field of foreign direct investment, there are still few researches on cross-border mergers and acquisitions. There are still many problems, such as lack of core technology, insufficient capacity of digestion and absorption, weak ability of independent innovation, etc. All sorts of reasons make our country hide behind the developed country forever, can't seize the control power of advanced technology fundamentally, thus promote the technical progress of our country. With the increasing of China's cross-border M & A, is there a stable dynamic equilibrium relationship between China's cross-border M & A and total factor productivity? Can Chinese enterprises acquire the core technology of the host country through the reverse spillover of cross-border mergers and acquisitions, and enhance the independent innovation ability of Chinese enterprises? This is our country enterprise at present urgent need to solve the problem. As a comprehensive index, total factor productivity can represent the level of productivity development and technological progress of a country. Therefore, this paper selects the data of China's total factor productivity (TFP), cross-border M & A stock and domestic R & D capital stock for 16 years from 1995 to 2011, and applies regression analysis model. This paper makes an empirical analysis on the relationship between domestic R & D investment and total factor productivity (TFP) in China. The results show that domestic R & D investment does play a positive role in TFP. However, the stock of cross-border M & A has no obvious correlation with the growth of total factor productivity. Finally, according to the current situation and deficiency of cross-border M & A in China, the paper puts forward some policy suggestions on how to improve the TFP and scientific research level effectively.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號(hào)】:F273.1;F124.1;F279.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳恩;王方方;扶濤;;企業(yè)生產(chǎn)率與中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資相關(guān)性研究——基于省際動(dòng)態(tài)面板模型的實(shí)證分析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2012年01期
2 劉宏;張蕾;;中國(guó)ODI逆向技術(shù)溢出對(duì)全要素生產(chǎn)率的影響程度研究[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2012年01期
3 孟雪;;跨國(guó)并購(gòu)對(duì)中國(guó)高技術(shù)產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)的影響——吸收能力視角的實(shí)證分析[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2011年05期
4 馮正強(qiáng);趙天培;;中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)研究[J];企業(yè)家天地(理論版);2010年11期
5 陳琦;;我國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)分析[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2010年18期
6 劉明霞;;中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)——基于技術(shù)差距的影響分析[J];中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期
7 劉偉全;;我國(guó)OFDI母國(guó)技術(shù)進(jìn)步效應(yīng)研究——基于技術(shù)創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)的投入產(chǎn)出視角[J];中國(guó)科技論壇;2010年03期
8 魏小侖;;我國(guó)企業(yè)跨國(guó)并購(gòu)經(jīng)營(yíng)績(jī)效實(shí)證研究[J];現(xiàn)代商貿(mào)工業(yè);2010年01期
9 謝眾;;國(guó)際貿(mào)易的技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)及其對(duì)我國(guó)TFP的影響[J];華東經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2009年12期
10 白潔;;對(duì)外直接投資的逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)——對(duì)中國(guó)全要素生產(chǎn)率影響的經(jīng)驗(yàn)檢驗(yàn)[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2009年08期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條
1 汪思齊;中國(guó)對(duì)外直接投資的母國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)進(jìn)步效應(yīng)研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2010年
2 儲(chǔ)貽波;對(duì)外直接投資和出口貿(mào)易的逆向技術(shù)溢出效應(yīng)分析[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年
3 吳靜靜;跨國(guó)并購(gòu)影響全要素生產(chǎn)率的實(shí)證研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2008年
本文編號(hào):2408870
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/jingjilunwen/zhongguojingjilunwen/2408870.html