發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-10-26 16:05

【摘要】：華慶地區(qū)位于鄂爾多斯(ERDOS)盆地天環(huán)坳陷南部,是長(zhǎng)慶油田的主產(chǎn)油區(qū)之一。近年,該區(qū)在致密油氣勘探方面取得了一系列重大突破,發(fā)現(xiàn)了許多新的油氣甜點(diǎn),已成鄂爾多斯盆地油氣勘探的熱點(diǎn)地區(qū),然而隨著勘探的深入,該區(qū)長(zhǎng)6段致密儲(chǔ)層所具有的低孔、低滲、油水關(guān)系復(fù)雜等特點(diǎn)使得測(cè)井解釋存在著符合率低、效果欠佳等問題。為此,本文針對(duì)ERDOS盆地華慶地區(qū)長(zhǎng)6段致密油儲(chǔ)層,首先優(yōu)選出對(duì)致密油響應(yīng)明顯的測(cè)井曲線;開展了電阻率曲線泥漿的侵入影響校正方法的研究;然后在用已收集的測(cè)井、錄井、試油資料及巖心實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù),對(duì)致密儲(chǔ)層"四性關(guān)系"進(jìn)行分析,建立儲(chǔ)層參數(shù)解釋模型,并得出儲(chǔ)層物性下限·,基于優(yōu)選出的致密油敏感曲線,進(jìn)行致密油含流體性質(zhì)識(shí)別方法的研究;最終形成一套適用于工區(qū)長(zhǎng)6段致密油的測(cè)井精細(xì)解釋軟件。具體取得了以下認(rèn)識(shí):(1)根據(jù)工區(qū)長(zhǎng)6段致密油測(cè)井響應(yīng)特征,優(yōu)選出的對(duì)致密油敏感的測(cè)井曲線有自然伽馬曲線、密度曲線、聲波時(shí)差曲線、補(bǔ)償中子曲線及陣列感應(yīng)電阻率曲線。(2)工區(qū)長(zhǎng)6段陣列感應(yīng)電阻率曲線具有較明顯幅度差,表明該段泥漿侵入明顯,因此有必要對(duì)陣列感應(yīng)電阻率進(jìn)行泥漿侵入校正。本研究針對(duì)致密油層的泥漿高侵和低侵特征,采用了一種基于陣列感應(yīng)測(cè)井徑向幾何因子的電阻率泥漿侵入校正方法,與斯倫貝謝電阻率校正圖版法校正結(jié)果相符。(3)通過"四性關(guān)系"研究,確定工區(qū)長(zhǎng)6段致密油測(cè)井響應(yīng)特征,然后對(duì)比分析了泥質(zhì)含量、孔隙度的不同計(jì)算方法,發(fā)現(xiàn)利用自然伽馬值計(jì)算泥質(zhì)含量精度較高,利用密度值計(jì)算孔隙度精度較高;通過分析巖心實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)確定孔隙度和滲透率的相關(guān)關(guān)系,用于工區(qū)滲透率的計(jì)算;然后利用工區(qū)巖電實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù),回歸得到阿爾奇公式中的a、b、m、n值,建立了高精度儲(chǔ)層參數(shù)解釋模型;最后采用孔飽關(guān)系法、產(chǎn)能分析法、經(jīng)驗(yàn)統(tǒng)計(jì)法綜合分析以確定長(zhǎng)6段儲(chǔ)層物性下限:孔隙度為6.4%,滲透率0.035mD。(4)根據(jù)優(yōu)選出的對(duì)致密油敏感的測(cè)井曲線,提出一個(gè)識(shí)別儲(chǔ)層流體性質(zhì)的孔電新參數(shù)ODI,同時(shí)與聲-電兩參數(shù)交會(huì)圖法、侵入特征分析法、三孔隙度重疊法、微分分析法等多種致密油含流體性質(zhì)識(shí)別方法進(jìn)行分析對(duì)比,發(fā)現(xiàn)孔電新參數(shù)ODI法對(duì)致密油含流體性質(zhì)識(shí)別效果最佳。(5)將上述方法集成,利用Fortran語(yǔ)言編程,形成了一套掛接在LEAD平臺(tái)上適用于華慶地區(qū)長(zhǎng)6段致密油的測(cè)井精細(xì)解釋軟件(Logtofi)。該軟件運(yùn)行穩(wěn)定,處理結(jié)果可靠,滿足了射孔壓裂工程對(duì)致密油測(cè)井評(píng)價(jià)的要求。
[Abstract]:Hua-qing area is located in the south of Tianhuan depression of Ordos (ERDOS) basin and is one of the main oil producing areas in Changqing Oilfield. In recent years, this area has made a series of major breakthroughs in tight oil and gas exploration, and many new oil and gas desserts have been discovered, which has become a hot spot for oil and gas exploration in the Ordos Basin. However, with the deepening of exploration, The low porosity, low permeability and complex oil-water relationship in the tight reservoir of Chang 6 in this area make the logging interpretation have some problems, such as low coincidence rate and poor effect. Therefore, in this paper, for the tight oil reservoir of Chang-6 formation in Huaqing area, ERDOS basin, the logging curve with obvious response to tight oil is selected, and the method of correction of the intrusion effect of mud on resistivity curve is studied. Then, by using the collected logging, oil test data and core experimental data, the "four properties" relation of tight reservoir is analyzed, and the interpretation model of reservoir parameters is established, and the lower limit of reservoir properties is obtained. Based on the selected sensitive curves of dense oil, the identification method of fluid properties of dense oil was studied. Finally, a set of fine logging interpretation software is developed for tight oil in section 6. The main results are as follows: (1) according to the response characteristics of tight oil logging in section 6, the selected logging curves which are sensitive to dense oil include natural gamma curve, density curve, acoustic moveout curve. Compensation neutron curve and array induced resistivity curve. (2) the amplitude of the array inductive resistivity curve of the 6-segment array is obviously different, which indicates that the mud invasion is obvious, so it is necessary to correct the array induction resistivity. In this paper, according to the characteristics of high and low mud invasion in dense reservoirs, a method of mud resistivity intrusion correction based on radial geometry factor of array induction logging is proposed. The results are consistent with the results of Schlumberger's resistivity correction plate method. (3) the response characteristics of tight oil logging in section 6 of Gongzou area are determined through the study of "four-sex relationship", and the different calculation methods of shale content and porosity are compared and analyzed. It is found that the accuracy of calculating shale content by natural gamma value is higher than that by density value. The correlation between porosity and permeability is determined by analyzing the core experimental data, which is used to calculate the permeability of the working area. Then, by using the experimental data of rock electricity in the working area and regressing to get the value of "A ~ (B)" in the Archie formula, a high-precision interpretation model of reservoir parameters is established. Finally, the pore saturation relationship, productivity analysis and empirical statistics are used to determine the lower limit of physical properties of Chang 6 reservoir: porosity is 6.4m, permeability is 0.035mD. (4) according to the selected logging curves sensitive to tight oil, In this paper, a new pore electric parameter ODI, is proposed to identify the fluid properties of tight oil, which is analyzed and compared with acoustic-electric two parameter cross plot method, intrusion characteristic analysis method, three porosity overlap method, differential analysis method, and so on. It is found that the new parameter ODI method is the best method for identifying the fluid properties of dense oil. (5) the above methods are integrated and programmed by Fortran language. A set of fine logging interpretation software (Logtofi). For tight oil of Chang-6 formation in Huqing area was formed on the platform of LEAD. The software runs stably and the processing results are reliable, which meets the requirements of perforating fracturing engineering for the evaluation of tight oil logging.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南石油大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：P618.13;P631.81

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭雷清;魚紅俠;;臺(tái)北西部低電阻油層測(cè)井解釋方法研究[J];吐哈油氣;2002年03期

2 馬向東,何云均,武云龍,馬靜;相控測(cè)井解釋方法在塔北油氣層評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];西部探礦工程;2004年01期

3 李征西;莫修文;;低阻油氣儲(chǔ)層測(cè)井解釋方法研究[J];吉林大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(地球科學(xué)版);2006年S2期

4 ;吐哈油田牛東地區(qū)火山巖儲(chǔ)層測(cè)井解釋方法又有新進(jìn)展[J];吐哈油氣;2008年03期

5 賈成前;白雪峰;張勇;馮全宏;高全峰;賈樂平;;吳起采油廠周長(zhǎng)油區(qū)測(cè)井解釋方法研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古石油化工;2012年18期

6 高楚橋,張超謨,布志虹,程漢林,孫靈芬;東濮凹陷低電阻率油層測(cè)井解釋方法研究[J];石油物探;2003年04期

7 翟中喜,臺(tái)懷忠,周改英,李顯路;新莊油田稠油層測(cè)井解釋方法研究[J];江漢石油學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年04期

8 張國(guó)軍;徐海濤;;相關(guān)法測(cè)井解釋方法的探討[J];石油儀器;2007年03期

9 張杰;;蘇可西油田測(cè)井解釋方法分析[J];國(guó)外測(cè)井技術(shù);2012年04期

10 丁明海,吳曉莉;泥質(zhì)砂巖三孔隙度測(cè)井解釋方法研究[J];大慶石油地質(zhì)與開發(fā);2005年04期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前4條

1 潘保芝;閆桂京;;遺傳最優(yōu)化測(cè)井解釋方法及應(yīng)用研究[A];2001年中國(guó)地球物理學(xué)會(huì)年刊——中國(guó)地球物理學(xué)會(huì)第十七屆年會(huì)論文集[C];2001年

2 劉曼芬;馮慶國(guó);劉迎春;董慶德;王秀江;楊善德;;高頻電磁波測(cè)井解釋方法的理論研究[A];1993年中國(guó)地球物理學(xué)會(huì)第九屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];1993年

3 楊玉卿;;層理構(gòu)造測(cè)井解釋方法淺探[A];第八屆古地理學(xué)與沉積學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2004年

4 龐巨豐;武曉蒙;葛輝;陳瓊;;注釓中子伽瑪測(cè)井解釋方法[A];陜西地球物理文集（七）中國(guó)西部地球物理研究與實(shí)踐陜西省地球物理學(xué)會(huì)成立20周年專集[C];2007年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 馮慶付;大慶徐家圍子地區(qū)深層火成巖氣藏測(cè)井解釋方法研究[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2007年

2 趙小青;砂泥巖剖面水平井感應(yīng)測(cè)井解釋方法研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 呂斯端;華慶地區(qū)延長(zhǎng)組致密油測(cè)井解釋方法研究[D];西南石油大學(xué);2017年

2 鄧仁雙;脈沖中子能譜測(cè)井解釋方法研究[D];西南石油大學(xué);2017年

3 丁永浩;泥質(zhì)砂巖三孔隙導(dǎo)電模型測(cè)井解釋方法研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2005年

4 張娟;塔南火山碎屑巖儲(chǔ)層測(cè)井解釋方法研究[D];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué);2012年

5 周越;天然氣水合物測(cè)井解釋方法初步研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

6 屈煒;A區(qū)低阻油層成因機(jī)理與測(cè)井解釋方法研究[D];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué);2012年

7 韓雪;梨樹斷陷砂礫巖儲(chǔ)層GA-CM混合最優(yōu)化測(cè)井解釋方法研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

8 唐海燕;烏爾遜凹陷火山碎屑巖儲(chǔ)層測(cè)井解釋方法研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

9 段亞男;蘇里格致密砂巖儲(chǔ)層BFA-CM混合最優(yōu)化測(cè)井解釋方法研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2015年

10 吳進(jìn)波;海上稠油油藏RPM測(cè)井解釋方法研究[D];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2296266