發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-02 23:13

  本文選題：葛蘭西 + 文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)��； 參考：《四川師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：葛蘭西的文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想在基于絕對的歷史主義和實(shí)踐一元論的視野中,囊括了“有機(jī)知識分子”的歷史使命、“被壓迫的社會群體”現(xiàn)實(shí)遭遇以及市民社會的葛氏轉(zhuǎn)向等多個(gè)議題,為無產(chǎn)階級革命領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的獲取與鞏固提供了深層次的倫理道德的理論支撐與情感維系。應(yīng)該注意到的是,葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)在今天的研究重點(diǎn),已經(jīng)由從概念上的有機(jī)構(gòu)成抑或其最終留下的結(jié)論到總體性的一個(gè)展開。因此,理論回到葛蘭西并對葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想完整把握,應(yīng)該以總體性的理論視角與全面性的理論結(jié)構(gòu)來重新審視它。論文首先在這個(gè)意義上,一方面,試圖從總體性出發(fā),以期在橫向視角上從各個(gè)學(xué)科領(lǐng)域來把握文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)理論,同時(shí)在縱向視角上認(rèn)為文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)既是先前一切文化淵藪的結(jié)果,也將會在自由王國中積極揚(yáng)棄;另一方面,試圖從全面性的理論視角來把握文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)理論來源、理論結(jié)構(gòu)、理論特征以及關(guān)于踐行難點(diǎn)的反思。其次,可以看到文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想經(jīng)由葛蘭西典范性的首創(chuàng)后,繼而由阿爾都塞、普蘭查斯、拉克勞、墨菲、哈貝馬斯從階級斗爭、話語、商談理論、日常生活、科學(xué)技術(shù)等等多個(gè)要素對其進(jìn)行理論的豐富與完善,批判與揚(yáng)棄,從而構(gòu)成了葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)在西方馬克思主義傳統(tǒng)中批判與演進(jìn)的理論路向�？梢哉f,西方馬克思主義各個(gè)不同的學(xué)派對文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想的進(jìn)一步說明與補(bǔ)充,使得文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)本身得到了極大的發(fā)展。最后,在對葛蘭西文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的理論圖像與理論路向的完整說明以后,回顧中國的文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)建構(gòu)的歷程,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)我們國家的文化建設(shè)方面與葛蘭西所提出的文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)的問題都堅(jiān)信文化等意識形態(tài)建設(shè)越來越成為無產(chǎn)階級政黨的重要任務(wù)。眾所周知,中國共產(chǎn)黨人對文化建設(shè)的不斷努力,使得文化等意識形態(tài)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)不斷地在歷史的動態(tài)中得到平衡和鞏固并在人民大眾中凝聚成強(qiáng)烈的認(rèn)同,從而為中國特色社會主義現(xiàn)代化的大踏步前進(jìn)鳴鑼開道。因此,論文的關(guān)鍵在于,以葛蘭西的文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想為經(jīng),以文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想的理論路向?yàn)榫?以中國文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)建構(gòu)為切入點(diǎn),反思中國領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)建構(gòu)的現(xiàn)實(shí)遭遇,并切中時(shí)弊地給出建設(shè)性的意見。
[Abstract]:In the view of absolute historicism and practical monism, Gramsci's thought of cultural leadership includes the historical mission of "organic intellectuals". The realistic encounter of the "oppressed social group" and the civil society's turn of Gehlet provide the theoretical support and emotional support for the acquisition and consolidation of the proletarian revolutionary leadership. It should be noted that the research focus of Gramsci's cultural leadership today has been expanded from the concept of organic composition or its final conclusion to the overall nature. Therefore, the return of the theory to Gramsci and the complete grasp of Gramsci's cultural leadership should be reexamined from the perspective of the overall theory and the comprehensive theoretical structure. First of all, in this sense, on the one hand, the thesis tries to start from the totality, in order to grasp the theory of cultural leadership from the perspective of various disciplines. At the same time, it is considered that cultural leadership is not only the result of all previous cultures, but also will be actively abandoned in the free kingdom. On the other hand, it tries to grasp the theoretical source and structure of cultural leadership from a comprehensive theoretical perspective. Theoretical characteristics and reflection on the difficulties of practice. Secondly, we can see that cultural leadership thought was first created by Gramsci, and then by Althusser, Prancas, Laclau, Murphy, Habermas from class struggle, discourse, negotiation theory, daily life. Many elements such as science and technology enrich and perfect the theory, criticize and sublate it, thus constitute the theoretical direction of the criticism and evolution of Gramsci's cultural leadership in the western Marxist tradition. It can be said that the different schools of Western Marxism further explain and supplement the thought of cultural leadership, which makes the cultural leadership itself greatly developed. Finally, after a complete explanation of the theoretical images and theoretical directions of Gramsci's cultural leadership, the author reviews the course of the construction of cultural leadership in China. It can be found that both the cultural construction of our country and the cultural leadership raised by Gramsci firmly believe that the construction of ideology such as culture is becoming an important task of the proletarian party. As we all know, the constant efforts of the Chinese Communists in cultural construction have made the leadership of ideology such as culture constantly balanced and consolidated in the dynamics of history and condensed into a strong identity among the masses of the people. Thus opening the way for the great strides forward of socialist modernization with Chinese characteristics. Therefore, the key of the thesis is to reflect on the realistic experience of the construction of Chinese cultural leadership by taking Gramsci's thought of cultural leadership as the classics, the theoretical direction of the thought of cultural leadership as the weft, and the construction of Chinese cultural leadership as the breakthrough point. At the same time, give constructive advice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：G02

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 胡愛玲;;葛蘭西對“意識形態(tài)”實(shí)踐功能的闡釋[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年06期

2 孫晶;葛蘭西的文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)思想[J];馬克思主義研究;2002年03期

3 李知恕,黃金輝;葛蘭西實(shí)踐哲學(xué)述評[J];西南民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2002年05期

4 李佃來;葛蘭西與當(dāng)代市民社會理論傳統(tǒng)[J];學(xué)術(shù)月刊;2004年01期

5 李佃來;哈貝馬斯市民社會理論探討[J];哲學(xué)研究;2004年06期

6 焦勇勤;葛蘭西文藝思想評析[J];工會論壇(山東省工會管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年06期

7 孟繁華;大眾文化與文化領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)[J];文藝爭鳴;2005年03期

8 田時(shí)綱;;“egemonia”是“領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)”還是“霸權(quán)”——葛蘭西政治理論的核心范疇[J];教學(xué)與研究;2007年08期

9 周凡;重讀葛蘭西的霸權(quán)理論[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實(shí);2005年05期

10 李海青;;理想的公共生活如何可能——對“公共理性”的一種政治倫理學(xué)闡釋[J];倫理學(xué)研究;2008年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 習(xí)近平;;在同全國勞動模范代表座談時(shí)的講話[N];人民日報(bào);2013年

，

本文編號：2091279