發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-30 18:33

  本文選題：小亞細(xì)亞 + 拜占庭��； 參考：《東北師范大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 小亞細(xì)亞半島是拜占庭帝國(guó)的基本組成部分之一,對(duì)拜占庭帝國(guó)的財(cái)政、國(guó)防等曾經(jīng)起到很大作用。公元11世紀(jì)起,隨著拜占庭內(nèi)部矛盾的加劇和突厥民族的興起,雙方在小亞地區(qū)爆發(fā)了沖突。隨著拜占庭內(nèi)部軍區(qū)制的瓦解和中央、地方矛盾的激化,拜占庭的國(guó)力日趨衰落,小亞地區(qū)被突厥人逐漸占領(lǐng)。突厥人在小亞采取了一系列得當(dāng)?shù)恼碱I(lǐng)、統(tǒng)治措施,使其在小亞的統(tǒng)治地位得到鞏固,并使小亞逐漸被突厥化。 拜占庭與突厥在小亞的沖突,不僅是一個(gè)農(nóng)業(yè)帝國(guó)同游牧民族的沖突,更是拜占庭為代表的東正教文明同新興伊斯蘭旗手的又一次碰撞,是小亞地區(qū)對(duì)不同文明類型的一次選擇。小亞問題,對(duì)研究文明之間的關(guān)系,有一定的參考作用。本文試圖通過拜占庭與突厥在小亞的沖突及結(jié)局來(lái)探究小亞被突厥人占領(lǐng)并逐步突厥化的原因。 全文由引言、正文、結(jié)論三大部分組成。引言部分包括文章的選題依據(jù)、國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀。 正文由四章組成:第一章介紹了小亞的主要狀況;第二章介紹了突厥的興起,并簡(jiǎn)要分析了突厥民族的特點(diǎn);第三章論述了雙方?jīng)_突與結(jié)果,簡(jiǎn)要分析了突厥人占領(lǐng)小亞的原因;第四章介紹分析了小亞的突厥化、小亞地區(qū)文明轉(zhuǎn)型的原因。 結(jié)語(yǔ)部分是對(duì)全文的概括總結(jié)。通過對(duì)11--14世紀(jì)拜占庭與突厥在小亞的沖突分析不難發(fā)現(xiàn):由于小亞自身的特點(diǎn)以及這4個(gè)世紀(jì)雙方所處的不同發(fā)展階段,小亞被突厥占領(lǐng)并被突厥化有著歷史的必然性。
[Abstract]:Asia minor is one of the basic components of the Byzantine Empire, which once played a great role in the finance and defense of the Byzantine Empire. Since the 11th century AD, with the aggravation of the internal contradictions in Byzantium and the rise of the Turkic people, the two sides broke out conflicts in Xiaoya region. With the disintegration of Byzantine's internal military region system and the intensification of local contradictions, the power of Byzantium declined day by day, and Xiaoya area was gradually occupied by Turkic people. The Turkic people took a series of proper occupation and domination measures in Xiaoya, which consolidated their dominant position in Xiaoya and gradually made them Turkic. The conflict between Byzantium and Turkic in Little Asia was not only a conflict between an agricultural empire and a nomadic people, but also another collision between Byzantium's Eastern Orthodox civilization and the new Islamic flag bearer. It is a choice for different types of civilizations in Asia. Small sub-problem, for the study of the relationship between civilizations, has a certain reference. This paper attempts to explore the causes of the occupation and gradual Turkization of Byzantium and Turkic in Xiaoya through the conflict and the outcome of the conflict between Byzantium and Turkic. The full text consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The introduction part includes the selected topic basis of the article, the domestic and foreign research present situation. The text is composed of four chapters: the first chapter introduces the main situation of Xiaoya; the second chapter introduces the rise of Turkic and briefly analyzes the characteristics of the Turkic nationality; the third chapter discusses the conflicts and results of both sides. The fourth chapter introduces the reason of the Turkization and the transformation of the civilization in Xiaoya. The conclusion part is a summary of the full text. Based on the analysis of the conflict between Byzantium and Turkic in the 11th and 14th centuries in Xiaoya, it is not difficult to find that due to the characteristics of Xiaoya and the different stages of development of the two sides in these four centuries, it is inevitable that Xiaoya was occupied and Turkized by Turkic.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：K134

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 張緒山;6—7世紀(jì)拜占庭帝國(guó)與西突厥汗國(guó)的交往[J];世界歷史;2002年01期

2 敬東;塞爾柱突厥與中亞[J];蘭州教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1995年01期

3 劉卓鋒;突厥民族的伊斯蘭化過程中波斯的作用[J];青海社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年06期

4 徐家玲;論早期拜占庭的宗教爭(zhēng)論問題[J];史學(xué)集刊;2000年03期

5 薛宗正;突厥可汗譜系新考[J];新疆大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1998年04期

6 阿米娜;試論羅姆蘇丹國(guó)的建立對(duì)小亞細(xì)亞的影響[J];新疆師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年02期

7 王治來(lái);論中亞的突厥化與伊斯蘭化[J];西域研究;1997年04期

8 魏良_";突厥汗國(guó)與中亞[J];西域研究;2005年03期

9 金朝光;突厥文化簡(jiǎn)述[J];昭烏達(dá)蒙族師專學(xué)報(bào)(漢文哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1956341