發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-22 14:25

  本文選題：關(guān)系嵌入 + 結(jié)構(gòu)嵌入��； 參考：《浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)》2015年博士論文

【摘要】：席卷而來的全球化浪潮在帶來發(fā)展機(jī)遇的同時(shí),也導(dǎo)致了生產(chǎn)要素的重新整合和再分配。為對(duì)抗跨國(guó)巨頭和大型企業(yè)依靠其自身固有渠道及技術(shù)、資本、人力等方面優(yōu)勢(shì)對(duì)資源的進(jìn)一步歸集,同業(yè)中小企業(yè)在地理上集聚形成產(chǎn)業(yè)集群,通過規(guī)模報(bào)酬、區(qū)域品牌等集聚優(yōu)勢(shì)參與市場(chǎng)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)。同時(shí),技術(shù)交叉整合的趨勢(shì)進(jìn)一步加劇,僅依靠個(gè)體企業(yè)有限內(nèi)部資源的線性創(chuàng)新模式逐漸被強(qiáng)調(diào)交換、互補(bǔ)、學(xué)習(xí)的網(wǎng)絡(luò)式創(chuàng)新模式所取代。而當(dāng)集群企業(yè)從內(nèi)部轉(zhuǎn)向外部尋求新的創(chuàng)新資源時(shí),面對(duì)紛繁外界信息往往無(wú)所適從,甚至部分企業(yè)因認(rèn)知水平、維護(hù)成本等因素對(duì)初期因地理臨近而形成的資源載體和競(jìng)爭(zhēng)模式產(chǎn)生路徑依賴,進(jìn)而導(dǎo)致出現(xiàn)集群的技術(shù)鎖定。而科技中介以信息和資源交換為主營(yíng)業(yè)務(wù),可以有效拓展企業(yè)資源獲取的廣度,交叉地位所帶的信息優(yōu)勢(shì)又能進(jìn)一步增加企業(yè)資源獲取的深度,被認(rèn)為是集群績(jī)效提升的重要推動(dòng)因素,引起了學(xué)術(shù)界的關(guān)注。然而在當(dāng)前研究中,實(shí)踐層次的現(xiàn)狀分析、經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié)、概念辨析、宏觀對(duì)策較多,而站在微觀角度從科技中介自身特征出發(fā)系統(tǒng)分析其作用機(jī)制的較少,與其相關(guān)的實(shí)證研究更是鳳毛麟角。因此,本文綜合運(yùn)用集群發(fā)展、嵌入性、創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)等理論,圍繞“科技中介如何影響集群績(jī)效”這一核心問題,采用理論研究與實(shí)證研究相結(jié)合、文獻(xiàn)閱讀與實(shí)地調(diào)查相結(jié)合、定性研究和定量研究相結(jié)合的方法,通過以下部分展開逐步深入的研究:(1)文獻(xiàn)述評(píng)與理論發(fā)展。通過對(duì)集群形成發(fā)展、嵌入性、創(chuàng)新網(wǎng)絡(luò)等理論的梳理回顧,找出現(xiàn)有研究的不足,確定合適的研究切入點(diǎn),并通過相似概念的對(duì)比辨析科技中介的概念及內(nèi)涵,形成本文論證的基礎(chǔ)。(2)概念模型的構(gòu)建。通過進(jìn)一步的文獻(xiàn)展開,從“嵌入性”視角將科技中介與集群內(nèi)其他行動(dòng)者的聯(lián)結(jié)關(guān)系歸納為關(guān)系嵌入和結(jié)構(gòu)嵌入兩個(gè)維度,分別剖析其對(duì)于集群績(jī)效的影響過程和影響機(jī)制,提出相應(yīng)的概念模型。(3)實(shí)證研究。結(jié)合41個(gè)浙江省產(chǎn)業(yè)集群示范區(qū)的統(tǒng)計(jì)數(shù)據(jù)和461家企業(yè)的有效調(diào)研數(shù)據(jù),運(yùn)用因子分析、層次回歸分析等數(shù)理方法對(duì)模型所包含的假設(shè)進(jìn)行了實(shí)驗(yàn)檢驗(yàn),最終確認(rèn)了科技中介嵌入性對(duì)集群績(jī)效的作用機(jī)制模型。通過以上研究論證工作,本文主要得到如下結(jié)論:(1)科技中介關(guān)系嵌入對(duì)集群績(jī)效存在積極的影響。依據(jù)科技中介對(duì)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新活動(dòng)的不同輔助方面,可以從內(nèi)容視角將科技中介在集群中的關(guān)系嵌入性分為資源搜索嵌入、交流溝通嵌入和商業(yè)化嵌入三個(gè)子項(xiàng)。資源搜索嵌入可以豐富企業(yè)知識(shí)源,增加獲取信息的異質(zhì)性,提升獲得互補(bǔ)性資源的可能性,并進(jìn)一步降低企業(yè)的搜索成本,利于企業(yè)績(jī)效的提升�？萍贾薪榈慕涣鳒贤ㄇ度肟梢约ぐl(fā)企業(yè)進(jìn)行技術(shù)交流、參與技術(shù)合作的意愿,促成集群內(nèi)產(chǎn)業(yè)聯(lián)盟的形成,增強(qiáng)企業(yè)的認(rèn)知能力,減少技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移障礙,促進(jìn)集群內(nèi)知識(shí)的傳播和擴(kuò)散,從而促進(jìn)集群績(jī)效的提升�？萍贾薪榈纳虡I(yè)化嵌入可以通過提供第三方評(píng)估等形式減少信息的不對(duì)稱性,促成技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)移的達(dá)成,并以成果轉(zhuǎn)化的方式向集群提供新的技術(shù),進(jìn)而推動(dòng)集群發(fā)展。(2)科技中介的結(jié)構(gòu)嵌入對(duì)集群績(jī)效存在積極的影響。結(jié)構(gòu)嵌入可以從中心度和占據(jù)結(jié)構(gòu)洞兩個(gè)維度來考量,科技中介的中心度越高、所占據(jù)的結(jié)構(gòu)洞越多,越能促進(jìn)集群績(jī)效的提升。當(dāng)科技中介位于網(wǎng)絡(luò)中心時(shí),依靠其顯著的信息優(yōu)勢(shì)和豐富的聯(lián)結(jié)渠道可以減少集群中信息傳播的失真和衰減,加速技術(shù)的轉(zhuǎn)移與擴(kuò)散,優(yōu)化集群的內(nèi)部發(fā)展環(huán)境。科技中介能夠從結(jié)構(gòu)洞中取得特殊的信息收益,利于業(yè)務(wù)能力的提升。此外,在集群網(wǎng)絡(luò)中占據(jù)較多結(jié)構(gòu)洞意味著其較好的彌補(bǔ)了網(wǎng)絡(luò)中的關(guān)系斷層,對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)產(chǎn)生了積極的黏合作用,縮減了企業(yè)維持必要關(guān)系聯(lián)結(jié)的成本,對(duì)集群發(fā)展起到了積極作用。(3)科技中介結(jié)構(gòu)嵌入在其關(guān)系嵌入對(duì)集群績(jī)效的影響機(jī)制中發(fā)揮部分調(diào)節(jié)作用�？萍贾薪榈闹行亩群驼紦�(jù)結(jié)構(gòu)洞對(duì)其資源搜索嵌入性、交流溝通嵌入性與集群績(jī)效之間的關(guān)系存正向的調(diào)節(jié)作用,而對(duì)商業(yè)化嵌入促進(jìn)集群績(jī)效增長(zhǎng)的過程沒有顯著的影響。較高的網(wǎng)絡(luò)地位能夠帶來豐富而特殊的信息優(yōu)勢(shì),使科技中介能夠掌握更多的異質(zhì)性資源,獲得更高的信息操作能力,便于更好的開展業(yè)務(wù)活動(dòng),從而加深與企業(yè)之間的關(guān)系。(4)從結(jié)構(gòu)嵌入角度可以將科技中介進(jìn)行分類。從科技中介自身性質(zhì)的微觀角度著手,以其中心度及所占據(jù)的結(jié)構(gòu)洞為基本測(cè)量維度,可以將科技中介分為基本型、冗余型、邊緣型、橋接型四種基本形式。然而,由于筆者時(shí)間、經(jīng)歷、研究水平所限,本文研究仍存在部分不足之處,對(duì)此本文最后一章進(jìn)行了歸納總結(jié),并指出了后續(xù)深入研究的主要方向。
[Abstract]:At the same time, the wave of globalization has brought about the development opportunities, and also led to the reintegration and redistribution of the production factors. Through scale reward, regional brand and other agglomeration advantages participate in the market competition. At the same time, the trend of technical cross integration is further intensified. The linear innovation model that relies solely on the limited internal resources of individual enterprises is gradually emphasized in exchange, complementarity and learning by network innovation model. In the face of new resources, it is often lost in the face of numerous external information. Even some enterprises depend on the factors such as cognitive level and maintenance cost, such as the resource carrier and competition mode formed by geographical proximity. To expand the breadth of enterprise resource acquisition, the information advantage of intersecting position can further increase the depth of enterprise resource acquisition. It is considered as an important driving factor for the promotion of cluster performance, which has aroused the attention of the academic circle. However, in the current research, the current situation analysis, experience summary, concept discrimination and macro countermeasures are more in the current research. From the micro point of view, from the characteristics of science and technology intermediaries, it is very rare to analyze the mechanism of its action, and the empirical research is very rare. Therefore, this paper comprehensively uses the theory of cluster development, embeddedness, innovation network and so on, and uses theoretical research and reality around the core issue of "how technology intermediary affects cluster performance". The combination of evidence research, literature reading and field investigation, qualitative research and quantitative research combined, through the following parts to carry out a gradual and in-depth study: (1) literature review and theoretical development. Through the review of the formation and development of cluster, embeddedness, innovation network and other theories, find out the lack of research and determine the appropriate In this paper, the concept and connotation of science and technology intermediaries are analyzed and analyzed through the comparison of similar concepts. (2) the construction of the conceptual model. Through further literature, from the perspective of "embeddedness", the connection between scientific and technological intermediaries and other actors in the cluster is divided into two dimensions of relationship Embeddedness and structure embeddedness. Analysis of the impact process and impact mechanism on the cluster performance, and put forward the corresponding conceptual model. (3) empirical study, combined with the statistical data of 41 Zhejiang industrial cluster demonstration areas and the effective data of 461 enterprises, using factor analysis, hierarchical regression analysis and other mathematical methods to test the hypothesis contained in the model test. Through the above research and demonstration, the main conclusions are as follows: (1) the embeddedness of technology intermediary relations has a positive impact on the cluster performance. According to the different auxiliary aspects of the technological intermediary to the enterprise innovation activities, the scientific and technological intermediary can be used in the science and technology from the content perspective. The embeddedness in the cluster is divided into three sub items: resource search embedding, communication Embeddedness and commercialization. Resource search and embeddedness can enrich enterprise knowledge sources, increase the heterogeneity of acquisition information, enhance the possibility of obtaining complementary resources, and further reduce the search cost of enterprises, and facilitate the promotion of enterprise performance. Intermediary communication and communication embeddedness can stimulate enterprises to exchange technology, participate in technical cooperation, promote the formation of industrial alliance within the cluster, enhance the cognitive ability of enterprises, reduce the barriers to transfer of technology, promote the spread and diffusion of knowledge within the cluster, and promote the promotion of cluster performance. The commercial embedding of the intermediary of science and technology can pass through Third party assessment and other forms are provided to reduce information asymmetry, contribute to the achievement of technology transfer, and provide new technologies to the cluster by the way of transformation. (2) the structural embeddedness of scientific and technological intermediaries has a positive impact on the cluster performance. The structure embeddedness can be examined from the two dimensions of the central degree and the occupying structure hole. The higher the center degree of the science and technology intermediary, the more the structure holes occupy, the more the structure can promote the promotion of the cluster performance. When the science and technology intermediary is located in the network center, it can reduce the distortion and attenuation of the information transmission in the cluster by its significant information advantage and rich connection channel, and optimize the internal development of the cluster with the transfer and diffusion of speed technology. Environment. Technology intermediary can obtain special information revenue from the structure of the structure, which is beneficial to the promotion of business capability. In addition, the occupying more structural holes in the cluster network means that it can make up for the relationship fault in the network, have a positive bonding effect on the network, reduce the cost of the enterprise to maintain the necessary relationship, and set up a group. (3) the embedment of technology intermediary structure is partially regulated by its embeddedness in the impact mechanism of relationship embeddedness on the impact mechanism of cluster performance. The centrality of scientific and technological intermediaries and occupying structural holes have a positive regulating effect on the relationship between resource search and embeddedness, communication Embeddedness and cluster performance, and the commercial Embeddedness is promoted. The process of the growth of cluster performance has no significant impact. Higher network status can bring rich and special information advantages, so that technology intermediaries can master more heterogeneous resources, obtain higher information operation ability, facilitate better business activities, and deepen the relationship between enterprises. (4) from the perspective of structural Embeddedness We can classify the intermediary of science and technology. From the micro angle of the nature of science and technology intermediary, we can divide the scientific intermediary into four basic forms, such as the basic form, the redundancy, the edge type and the bridge type. However, the research still exists because of the limitation of the author's time, experience and the research level. In this part, the last chapter is summarized, and the main direction of further research is pointed out.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F273.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 初振波;遼寧省科技中介組織存在的問題及對(duì)策[J];遼寧經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

2 喻明;英國(guó)科技中介服務(wù)機(jī)構(gòu)的現(xiàn)狀及啟示[J];中國(guó)高校技術(shù)市場(chǎng);2001年08期

3 ;科技中介道德準(zhǔn)則研討會(huì)暨全國(guó)技術(shù)市場(chǎng)協(xié)會(huì)第三次聯(lián)席會(huì)召開[J];科技成果縱橫;2002年04期

4 楊健安;科技中介的春天[J];中國(guó)高校科技與產(chǎn)業(yè)化;2002年12期

5 張景勇;科技中介亦需“充電”[J];中國(guó)高�？萍寂c產(chǎn)業(yè)化;2002年12期

6 ;科技中介:創(chuàng)新的橋梁[J];科技經(jīng)濟(jì)市場(chǎng);2002年11期

7 張景安;;關(guān)于我國(guó)科技中介組織發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略思考[J];中國(guó)軟科學(xué);2003年04期

8 汪良剛,張步新;科研院所改制為科技中介組織探析[J];建筑機(jī)械;2003年12期

9 陳炳水;論我國(guó)“入世”背景下科技中介組織的發(fā)展與政府管理[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年03期

10 道松;科技中介是科技創(chuàng)新的重要支撐[J];粉末冶金工業(yè);2003年05期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 黃邦升;;淺議科技中介組織的生存與發(fā)展[A];第三屆海南省科技論壇論文選編[C];2005年

2 王玉梅;;山東省科技中介組織競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究[A];科學(xué)發(fā)展觀：理論·模式·實(shí)踐——山東省社會(huì)科學(xué)界2006年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)文集（4）[C];2006年

3 葛敬民;;山東省科技中介高素質(zhì)人才培養(yǎng)的機(jī)制和模式創(chuàng)新[A];決策與管理研究（2007-2008）——山東省軟科學(xué)計(jì)劃優(yōu)秀成果匯編（第七冊(cè)·下）[C];2009年

4 顧建光;;發(fā)揮科技中介在科技創(chuàng)新中的作用[A];中國(guó)行政管理學(xué)會(huì)2004年年會(huì)暨“政府社會(huì)管理與公共服務(wù)”論文集[C];2004年

5 馬云啟;呂杰;劉冰;;試論構(gòu)建高校科技中介服務(wù)體系的重要性[A];科學(xué)發(fā)展與社會(huì)責(zé)任（B卷）——第五屆沈陽(yáng)科學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)文集[C];2008年

6 孫海軍;;科技中介主要服務(wù)項(xiàng)目及基本操作程序和計(jì)費(fèi)方法的研究[A];中國(guó)技術(shù)市場(chǎng)二十年輝煌歷程與可持續(xù)發(fā)展論文集[C];2004年

7 趙綺秋;;加強(qiáng)科技中介職業(yè)道德建設(shè) 促進(jìn)技術(shù)市場(chǎng)繁榮發(fā)展[A];首屆中國(guó)技術(shù)市場(chǎng)論壇論文集[C];2003年

8 李華;王有年;吳國(guó)娟;董利民;;我國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)科技中介建設(shè)所存在的問題及對(duì)策研究(摘要)[A];2004年全國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)農(nóng)業(yè)分會(huì)場(chǎng)論文專集[C];2004年

9 吳實(shí);;培育科技中介 繁榮技術(shù)市場(chǎng)[A];中國(guó)技術(shù)市場(chǎng)二十年輝煌歷程與可持續(xù)發(fā)展論文集[C];2004年

10 梁閩凱;;關(guān)于工業(yè)中心城市建立科技中介組織的探索[A];濟(jì)寧市技術(shù)創(chuàng)新與可持續(xù)發(fā)展論文選編[C];2005年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 晏燕;創(chuàng)新的呼喚科技中介漫山紅遍[N];科技日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

2 呂賢如;科技中介成為首都創(chuàng)新體系重要部分[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

3 鄧新廣;科技中介當(dāng)解下“鐐銬”跳舞[N];科技日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

4 望俊成 房小可;中國(guó)科技中介需要“鷹爸”[N];科技日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

5 記者 賈婧 王春;做好產(chǎn)業(yè)鏈上科技中介這一環(huán)[N];科技日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

6 徐頑強(qiáng);科技服務(wù)中介發(fā)展障礙的原因分析[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

7 陳建輝　王君平　柯　平;科技中介助成果轉(zhuǎn)化打通“腸梗阻”[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

8 記者 應(yīng)麗齋;科技中介，何時(shí)出現(xiàn)在我們身邊[N];嘉興日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

9 張義芳 蘇靖;科技中介：創(chuàng)新的橋梁[N];科技日?qǐng)?bào);2002年

10 本報(bào)記者 范力;農(nóng)業(yè)科技中介建設(shè)重點(diǎn)推進(jìn)六項(xiàng)工作[N];科技日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 郭元源;科技中介嵌入性與集群績(jī)效關(guān)系研究[D];浙江工業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

2 張衛(wèi)東;區(qū)域性科技中介服務(wù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)體系建設(shè)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

3 潘文華;黑龍江省農(nóng)業(yè)科技中介組織體系研究[D];東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 藍(lán)波濤;廣西科技中介組織的培育與發(fā)展研究[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2008年

2 房瑞標(biāo);我國(guó)科技中介及發(fā)展研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2009年

3 賈建軍;科技中介發(fā)展與科技創(chuàng)新能力研究[D];成都理工大學(xué);2009年

4 劉鋒;我國(guó)科技中介的規(guī)范化問題研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2004年

5 潘博;我國(guó)科技中介的理性思考和對(duì)策分析[D];南昌大學(xué);2007年

6 程琦;我國(guó)科技中介組織的管理模式研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2006年

7 王環(huán);青島市科技中介組織與區(qū)域創(chuàng)新主體協(xié)同發(fā)展績(jī)效研究[D];青島大學(xué);2011年

8 孟慧婷;科技中介分享成果轉(zhuǎn)化收益問題研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2012年

9 張愛民;科技中介在山西區(qū)域技術(shù)創(chuàng)新體系中的作用[D];山西大學(xué);2008年

10 王濟(jì)淵;沈陽(yáng)市促進(jìn)科技中介發(fā)展的政策法規(guī)體系問題研究[D];沈陽(yáng)工業(yè)大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1787636