發(fā)布時間：2018-05-19 09:00

  本文選題：創(chuàng)新搜索 + 雙元平衡��； 參考：《西北大學(xué)》2016年博士論文

【摘要】：新的創(chuàng)新環(huán)境下,精益、敏捷的創(chuàng)新需求與企業(yè)創(chuàng)新資源有限之問的矛盾日漸凸顯,創(chuàng)新搜索作為破解矛盾的顯性途徑倍受重視。然而,創(chuàng)新搜索涉及諸多對創(chuàng)新而言不可或缺但行為邏輯卻截然不同甚至相反的任務(wù),過度關(guān)注一方而偏廢其它易使企業(yè)落入創(chuàng)新“陷阱”繼而損害創(chuàng)新績效。由此,創(chuàng)新搜索平衡命題開始納入管理者與學(xué)者視野。其中,借鑒組織雙元性思想以實現(xiàn)創(chuàng)新搜索平衡的觀點獲得大量實踐與理論支持。但是,現(xiàn)有研究極少以多維整合視角來刻畫創(chuàng)新搜索從而難以形成完整的雙元平衡策略；普遍缺失雙元治理的“適應(yīng)性判定”因而抑制了雙元平衡策略制定的規(guī)范性與科學(xué)性；對創(chuàng)新搜索雙元平衡策略發(fā)揮作用的協(xié)同機(jī)理挖掘不足,對影響創(chuàng)新搜索雙元平衡策略績效效果的組織內(nèi)外部權(quán)變因素關(guān)注不足,由此阻礙創(chuàng)新搜索雙元平衡“黑箱”的開啟。在此背景下,本文圍繞“企業(yè)如何在多維層面上實現(xiàn)創(chuàng)新搜索雙元平衡以改進(jìn)創(chuàng)新績效”這一基本命題,逐層遞進(jìn)研究四個子問題：(1)如何以多個維度來共同刻畫創(chuàng)新搜索?(2)如何在多維層面科學(xué)、合理地構(gòu)建更為完整的企業(yè)創(chuàng)新搜索雙元平衡策略?(3)這些創(chuàng)新搜索雙元平衡策略作用于創(chuàng)新績效的機(jī)理與結(jié)果是怎樣的?(4)競爭強(qiáng)度、行業(yè)增長(組織外部市場環(huán)境)以及情境分離(組織內(nèi)部員工能力)對上述作用機(jī)理與結(jié)果有何影響?對此,本文結(jié)合規(guī)范研究與實證研究展開分析。子問題一,基于企業(yè)創(chuàng)新搜索的行為邏輯和組織注意力理論,找到企業(yè)創(chuàng)新搜索決策的關(guān)鍵問題,每一關(guān)鍵問題與一個維度對應(yīng)從而提煉出創(chuàng)新搜索多個維度。子問題二,基于組織雙元性管理范式,先在多維層面識別企業(yè)面臨的競爭性搜索任務(wù),后對其進(jìn)行雙元治理的適用性判定,對通過判定的競爭性搜索任務(wù)相應(yīng)做出雙元平衡策略安排。子問題三,通過文獻(xiàn)研究與理論推演,提出各類型創(chuàng)新搜索雙元平衡策略作用于企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的研究假設(shè)并予以實證檢驗。子問題四則在子問題三的基礎(chǔ)上,引入競爭強(qiáng)度、行業(yè)增長及情境分離作為調(diào)節(jié)變量,同樣經(jīng)文獻(xiàn)研究與理論推演,提出相應(yīng)假設(shè)并予以實證檢驗。本文實證檢驗數(shù)據(jù)來自275家中國企業(yè)的問卷調(diào)研,運(yùn)用題項得分相關(guān)系數(shù)法、AVE值與CR值、競爭模型比較法等檢驗量表信度與效度,采用相關(guān)系數(shù)法、Harman單因素法檢驗共同方法偏差,采用層次回歸分析法驗證所提假設(shè)。本研究的主要結(jié)論如下：第一、創(chuàng)新搜索可用“內(nèi)容-距離-行為”三個維度來刻畫,它們契合組織創(chuàng)新搜索的行為邏輯且分別呼應(yīng)著組織注意力決策中的三個關(guān)鍵問題：“搜索什么知識——到哪里搜索目標(biāo)知識——如何搜索目標(biāo)知識”。創(chuàng)新搜索三維構(gòu)念的提出突破了單維和二維劃分,拓展了創(chuàng)新搜索理論的研究視角與維度內(nèi)涵。第二、按照組織雙元性管理范式的三個程序化環(huán)節(jié),發(fā)現(xiàn)在創(chuàng)新搜索“內(nèi)容-距離-行為”三維構(gòu)念下,企業(yè)面臨兩組競爭性搜索任務(wù),即：市場知識搜索與技術(shù)知識搜索、寬度搜索與深度搜索。對其雙元治理兼具戰(zhàn)略重要性與兼容性,具體的雙元平衡策略有三大類共六種：第一類、搜索內(nèi)容相同的寬度搜索與深度搜索雙元平衡策略,涵蓋市場知識寬度與深度搜索雙元平衡、技術(shù)知識寬度與深度搜索雙元平衡；第二類、完全寬度或深度搜索下市場知識與技術(shù)知識搜索雙元平衡策略,包括市場知識寬度搜索與技術(shù)知識寬度搜索雙元平衡、市場知識深度搜索與技術(shù)知識深度搜索雙元平衡；第三類、搜索內(nèi)容不同時,寬度搜索與深度搜索交叉雙元平衡策略,包括市場知識寬度搜索與技術(shù)知識深度搜索雙元平衡、市場知識深度搜索與技術(shù)知識寬度搜索雙元平衡。此部分研究填補(bǔ)了雙元治理適應(yīng)性判定的缺失,規(guī)范了組織雙元性理論的應(yīng)用研究。第三、三類創(chuàng)新搜索雙元平衡策略作用于創(chuàng)新績效的機(jī)理與效果具有差異。第一類策略因“概念協(xié)同”正向影響且比單一搜索策略更顯著地提升企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效；第二類策略雖可發(fā)揮“供需協(xié)同”,但其實質(zhì)仍是單一地寬度搜索或深度搜索,易引致創(chuàng)新陷阱,因而未能顯著改進(jìn)創(chuàng)新績效,甚至完全深度搜索會損害創(chuàng)新績效；第三類策略因為“概念協(xié)同”與“供需協(xié)同”耦合作用,對企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效有顯著正向影響且比單一創(chuàng)新搜索策略以及其他兩類雙元平衡策略更顯著地提升企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效。此部分研究探析了創(chuàng)新搜索雙元平衡影響企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的“黑箱”,深化了創(chuàng)新搜索平衡問題的研究。第四、競爭強(qiáng)度、行業(yè)增長與情境分離在創(chuàng)新搜索雙元平衡影響創(chuàng)新績效的作用機(jī)制中發(fā)揮不同的調(diào)節(jié)效應(yīng)。競爭強(qiáng)度越大,第一與第三類策略對創(chuàng)新績效的正向作用越大；第二類策略中的完全寬度搜索對創(chuàng)新績效的正向作用越大,而完全深度搜索對創(chuàng)新績效的負(fù)向作用越大。行業(yè)增長越高,第一與第三類策略對企業(yè)創(chuàng)新績效的正向影響越��；完全深度搜索對創(chuàng)新績效的負(fù)向影響作用越小。情境分離水平越高,第一與第三類策略對創(chuàng)新績效的正向影響越大,完全深度搜索對創(chuàng)新績效的負(fù)向影響作用越小。
[Abstract]:In the new innovation environment, the contradiction between lean, agile innovation demand and the limited resources of enterprise innovation is becoming more and more obvious. Innovation search is regarded as the dominant way to solve the contradiction. However, innovation search involves many tasks which are indispensable to innovation but have different or even opposite behavior logic. It is easy to make the enterprise fall into the innovation "trap" and then damage the innovation performance. Therefore, the innovation search balance proposition begins to be included in the managers and the scholars' vision. Innovative search makes it difficult to form a complete dual balance strategy, and the universally missing dual governance "adaptive decision" inhibits the normalization and scientificity of the dual balance strategy, and the synergistic mechanism of the innovative search dual balance strategy is insufficient and the performance effect of the dual balance strategy for the search innovation is achieved. The internal and external contingency factors are not concerned, which hinders the opening of the "black box" in the dual balance of innovation search. In this context, this paper focuses on the basic proposition of "how enterprises realize the dual balance of innovation search in multidimensional level to improve innovation performance", and studies the four sub problems by layer by layer: (1) how to use multiple dimensions Co depicting innovation search? (2) how to construct a more complete and more complete dual balance strategy of enterprise innovation search at a multidimensional level? (3) what are the mechanisms and results of these innovative search dual balance strategies on innovation performance? (4) competition intensity, industrial growth (external market environment) and situational separation (internal organization) What is the impact of employee ability on the mechanism and results of the above action? This paper analyzes the problems of the normative and empirical research. First, based on the behavioral logic and organizational attention theory of enterprise innovation search, the key problems of enterprise innovation search decision are found. Search multiple dimensions. Sub problem two. Based on the organizational dual management paradigm, the competitive search task facing the enterprise is first identified in the multidimensional level. Then, the applicability determination of the dual governance is carried out. The dual balance strategy is made for the competitive search task by the decision. The sub problem three, through literature research and theoretical deduction, is proposed. On the basis of the sub problem three, four sub problems are introduced to the research hypothesis and the empirical test. On the basis of the sub problem three, the sub problem introduces the competition intensity, the industry growth and the situation separation as the adjustment variable, and the corresponding hypothesis and the empirical test are put forward by the literature research and theoretical deduction. The empirical test data from 275 Chinese enterprises questionnaire survey, using item score correlation coefficient method, AVE value and CR value, competition model comparison test scale reliability and validity, the correlation coefficient method, Harman single factor method test common method deviation, using the hierarchical regression analysis to verify the hypothesis. The main conclusions of this study are as follows First, innovative search can be described by three dimensions of "content distance behavior". They fit the behavioral logic of organizational innovation search and respond to the three key problems in organizing attention decision: "search what knowledge - where to search for target knowledge - how to search target knowledge". Second, according to the three procedural links of the organizational dual management paradigm, it is found that the enterprise is faced with two groups of competitive search tasks, namely, market knowledge search and technology, under the three procedural links of the organizational dual management paradigm. Operation knowledge search, width search and depth search. It has strategic importance and compatibility for its dual governance. There are three categories of specific dual balance strategies: the first class, the same width search and depth search dual balance strategy, covering the market knowledge width and depth search dual balance, and the technical knowledge width and the breadth of knowledge. Deep search dual balance; the second class, full width or depth search for market knowledge and technical knowledge search dual balance strategy, including market knowledge width search and technical knowledge width search dual balance, market knowledge depth search and technical knowledge depth search double balance; the third category, search content is different, width search. And depth search cross dual balance strategy, including market knowledge breadth search and technical knowledge depth search dual balance, market knowledge depth search and technical knowledge width search dual balance. This part of the study fills the lack of dual governance adaptability decision, standardizes the application of the third, third types of fabric theory. The mechanism and effect of the new search dual balance strategy on the innovation performance are different. The first kind of strategy has a positive effect on the "concept synergy" and is more significant to improve the enterprise innovation performance than the single search strategy. The second strategy can play a "supply and demand synergy", but its essence is still a single width search or deep search, easy to introduce. Innovation traps can not significantly improve innovation performance, and even complete depth search will damage innovation performance. The third strategy has a significant positive impact on enterprise innovation performance because of the coupling effect of "concept synergy" and "supply and demand synergy", which is more significant than the single innovation search strategy and the other two types of dual balance strategies. This part studies the "black box" that the innovative search dual balance affects the enterprise innovation performance, and deepens the research on the problem of innovation search balance. Fourth, competition intensity, industry growth and situation separation play different regulatory effects in the mechanism of innovative search dual balance affecting innovation performance. The greater the intensity, the greater the positive effect of the first and third strategies on the innovation performance; the greater the positive effect of the full width search on the innovation performance in the second strategies, and the greater the negative effect of the complete depth search on the innovation performance. The higher the industry growth, the smaller the positive effect of the first and third strategies on the enterprise innovation performance. The more negative impact of full depth search has on the negative impact of innovation performance, the higher the level of situation separation, the greater the positive impact of the first and third strategies on innovation performance, and the smaller the negative impact of full depth search on innovation performance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：F273.1
，

本文編號：1909490