發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-06 07:33

  本文選題：意識(shí)形態(tài)文論　切入點(diǎn)：文學(xué)審美意識(shí)形態(tài)　出處：《理論導(dǎo)刊》2017年11期

【摘要】：國(guó)內(nèi)目前的意識(shí)形態(tài)文論建設(shè)存在這樣幾個(gè)問(wèn)題:一是對(duì)經(jīng)典作家的經(jīng)典文本的詮釋還有待深入;二是對(duì)國(guó)外意識(shí)形態(tài)及文論思想的借鑒、批判存在不足;三是受西方學(xué)術(shù)觀(guān)念轉(zhuǎn)變影響,中國(guó)學(xué)界已開(kāi)始把意識(shí)形態(tài)問(wèn)題轉(zhuǎn)化為一個(gè)美學(xué)問(wèn)題,但到目前為止,學(xué)界始終未能提出合理有效闡釋文學(xué)現(xiàn)象的意識(shí)形態(tài)批評(píng)模式。就第一個(gè)問(wèn)題看,馬克思定性文學(xué)使用的概念是"意識(shí)形態(tài)的形式",直接使用"意識(shí)形態(tài)"定性文學(xué)的人是恩格斯,這一點(diǎn)應(yīng)明確。就第二個(gè)問(wèn)題看,意識(shí)形態(tài)文論建設(shè)雖然取得了實(shí)績(jī),但還有深入研究的可能和必要。就第三個(gè)問(wèn)題,應(yīng)該認(rèn)識(shí)到,形式是組織材料并賦予材料以意義的一種結(jié)構(gòu)性功能或力量。從而,文學(xué)研究的基本思路應(yīng)從特殊到一般,即從審美、形式到政治、意識(shí)形態(tài),而不是相反�？紤]到文學(xué)批評(píng)從根本上是一個(gè)實(shí)踐問(wèn)題,這里只能提出一個(gè)大致的構(gòu)想和框架,即作家創(chuàng)作過(guò)程中存在意識(shí)形態(tài)沖突、文本中及文本間存在意識(shí)形態(tài)沖突、文學(xué)接受過(guò)程中存在意識(shí)形態(tài)沖突。
[Abstract]:There are several problems in the construction of ideological literary theory in China: first, the interpretation of classical texts of classical writers remains to be deepened;Third, influenced by the change of western academic concepts, the Chinese academic circles have begun to turn the ideological problem into an aesthetic problem, but so far, the academic circles have not been able to put forward a rational and effective interpretation of literary phenomenon of ideological criticism model.As far as the first problem is concerned, the concept of Marx's use of qualitative literature is "the form of ideology", and the person who directly uses "ideology" to characterize literature is Engels, which should be made clear.From the second point of view, although the construction of ideological literary theory has made achievements, it is possible and necessary to further study it.With regard to the third question, it should be recognized that the form is a structural function or force that organizes and gives meaning to material.Thus, the basic thinking of literary research should be from special to general, from aesthetics, form to politics, ideology, and not vice versa.Considering that literary criticism is fundamentally a practical problem, we can only put forward a general conception and framework, that is, there are ideological conflicts in the process of writers' creation, and ideological conflicts in and between texts.There are ideological conflicts in the process of literary acceptance.
【作者單位】： 蘭州城市學(xué)院文史學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“新時(shí)期文藝?yán)碚摻ㄔO(shè)與文藝批評(píng)研究”(12AZD012)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I0
，

本文編號(hào)：1718579