發(fā)布時間：2018-04-13 20:34

  本文選題：列維納斯 + 文學批評��； 參考：《文學評論》2017年03期

【摘要】：列維納斯區(qū)分了"言說"和"所說":"言說"代表一種對他者原初的袒露,"所說"則是一種可以為眾他者所共享的語言。文學由于其"迷"、兩可和不可追溯等特點而接近于"言說";批評則是一種更強調(diào)公共性的書寫,更近于"所說"。"言說"和"所說"的分野本質(zhì)上是由于第三方的來臨導致的,第三方代表了復數(shù)的他者到來,它帶來了對于公正性的訴求,還帶來了一個超越于二人場景之外的共同體。批評家在文學世界和公共生活中的身份類似于第三方,與生俱來就承擔一種公共責任,第三方同時也帶來了作者、讀者和批評家三者身份的互換。批評家作為第三方的定位,有助于我們?yōu)楝F(xiàn)代主義文學在自身價值和公共價值的分野之間找到一條中和之道。
[Abstract]:Levinas distinguishes between "saying" and "speaking": "saying" represents a kind of exposure to the original other, and "saying" is a language that can be shared by all others.Literature is close to "speech" because of its characteristics of "mystery", "two can not be traced back" and so on; criticism is a kind of writing with more emphasis on publicity and closer to "saying". "The distinction between "saying" and "saying" is essentially caused by the coming of the third party, which represents the arrival of the other in the plural. It brings about the demand for fairness and a community beyond the two-person scene.The identity of the critic in the literary world and public life is similar to that of the third party, which is born with a kind of public responsibility, and the third party also brings the exchange of the identity of the author, the reader and the critic.The position of critics as a third party helps us find a way of neutralizing modernist literature between its own value and public value.
【作者單位】： 華東師范大學中文系;
【基金】：國家社科基金青年項目“列維納斯與文學批評研究”(編號:16CZW005),國家社科基金重大項目“當代西方前沿文論研究”(編號:12901—412121—14050)的階段性成果
【分類號】：I06

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 孫冰;;專訪“Art HK”展覽總監(jiān)馬格納斯·倫弗魯 在“文化沙漠”辦藝術(shù)派對[J];中國經(jīng)濟周刊;2012年25期

2 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號：1746088