發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-17 17:04

【摘要】： 勞倫斯和郁達(dá)夫是文學(xué)史上著名的作家,被認(rèn)為是很有影響的現(xiàn)代小說(shuō)家。兩者分別是英中現(xiàn)代文學(xué)史上飽受爭(zhēng)議卻極富才華的作家。勞倫斯的長(zhǎng)篇小說(shuō)為其帶來(lái)了國(guó)際聲譽(yù),郁達(dá)夫也是我國(guó)五四時(shí)期文學(xué)的代表人物。在本文中我們將以他們最為著名的小說(shuō)《兒子與情人》和《沉淪》為例,結(jié)合他們的生平經(jīng)歷以及社會(huì)對(duì)兩位的影響和他們所特有的世界觀來(lái)進(jìn)行討論。相似的人生經(jīng)歷、相似的創(chuàng)作方法、相似的表現(xiàn)主題和相似的文學(xué)命運(yùn)使得他們具有極強(qiáng)的可比性。 本文以二者的生活經(jīng)歷為切入點(diǎn),比較分析不同國(guó)度的兩位作家在他們表面相似的表現(xiàn)手法背后,實(shí)際上隱藏著彼此不同的文化內(nèi)涵,體現(xiàn)出他們?cè)趧?chuàng)作上的異同。兩部作品都帶有自傳色彩,與自己的真實(shí)生活相聯(lián)系,并以此作為小說(shuō)的基本構(gòu)架。在內(nèi)容上,兩位作家不約而同的用不同尋常的方式來(lái)演繹自己想象中的情感。差異之處表現(xiàn)在勞倫斯對(duì)性愛的描寫是對(duì)社會(huì)的理性反抗,而郁達(dá)夫則是對(duì)傳統(tǒng)道德的本能反抗。 比較文學(xué)實(shí)際上是研究不同國(guó)家和民族文學(xué)作品之間的關(guān)聯(lián)。本論文寫出了為什么把勞倫斯與郁達(dá)夫放在一起比較的原因,并且結(jié)合他們各自的生活經(jīng)歷(包括生平、愛情和工作)、性格特質(zhì)及其社會(huì)對(duì)他們的影響來(lái)分析他們的作品。并對(duì)其代表作《兒子與情人》和《沉淪》進(jìn)行了相應(yīng)的比較,分析了兩部作品的相同點(diǎn)與不同點(diǎn)。力求在共性中找出特性。通過(guò)比較進(jìn)一步了解兩位作家在其作品中反映出的社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)。
[Abstract]:Lawrence and Yu Dafu are famous writers in the history of literature and are regarded as influential modern novelists. The two are highly controversial but talented writers in the history of modern English and Chinese literature. Lawrence's novel has brought him international reputation, Yu Dafu is also the representative of China's May 4th period literature. In this paper, we will take their most famous novels, "son and Lover" and "sinking" as examples, and discuss their life experiences, the influence of society on them and their unique world outlook. Similar life experiences, similar creative methods, similar themes of expression and similar literary destiny make them extremely comparable. Taking their life experiences as the starting point, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the similarities and differences between the two writers in their appearance, which in fact hides the different cultural connotations of each other and reflects their similarities and differences in their creation. Both works are autobiographical, linked to their real life, and used as the basic framework of the novel. In content, the two writers in the same way in an unusual way to interpret their imaginary feelings. The difference is that Lawrence's description of sex is a rational resistance to society, while Yu Dafu is an instinctive resistance to traditional morality. Comparative literature is actually a study of the relationship between different countries and national literary works. This paper presents the reasons why Lawrence and Yu Dafu are compared, and analyzes their works in terms of their respective life experiences (including life, love and work), personality traits and the impact of society on them. The author also compares his representative works son and Lover, and analyses the similarities and differences between the two works. Try to find out the characteristics in commonality. Through the comparison to further understand the two writers in their works reflected in the social reality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：長(zhǎng)春理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：I106.4;I0-03

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 何穎;論勞倫斯作品的自我、社會(huì)觀[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2000年04期

2 張禮龍;畸形母愛的社會(huì)和心理因素及其災(zāi)難性后果——?jiǎng)趥愃归L(zhǎng)篇小說(shuō)《兒子與情人》評(píng)析[J];山東外語(yǔ)教學(xué);2000年04期

3 葛麗娟;勞倫斯和他的《兒子與情人》[J];天中學(xué)刊(駐馬店師專學(xué)報(bào));1997年01期

4 雷納托·波齊奧里 ,張隆溪;比較文學(xué)[J];國(guó)外文學(xué);1981年04期

5 畢冰賓;畸形的愛,心靈的悲劇——論勞倫斯的《兒子與情人》[J];外國(guó)文學(xué)評(píng)論;1987年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2442498