發(fā)布時間：2018-03-21 07:19

  本文選題：勞動教養(yǎng)制度　切入點：勞動教養(yǎng)制度缺陷　出處：《湖南師范大學》2010年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 作為一種在我國存在了五十多年的制度,勞動教養(yǎng)制度可以說是有鮮明中國特色的一種制度。但這種制度發(fā)展到今天,在以法治原則作為判斷標準的前提下,是否符合法治國家的要求已越來越成為備受矚目的問題。特別是隨著我國改革開放的深入,在日益加強的國際人權(quán)對話和交流中,勞動教養(yǎng)的法治化成了一個更為刻不容緩的熱點問題,關(guān)于勞動教養(yǎng)制度的“廢除論”和“完善論”在激烈地大碰撞著。但一種制度的產(chǎn)生具有其特定的歷史根據(jù),因而對其存在合理性的考察必須以特定的時空背景作為判斷的主要依據(jù)。所以不能簡單地抹殺勞動教養(yǎng)制度,亦不能任期弊端發(fā)展下去而不改,而應(yīng)該認真考察、分析這一制度存在的主要問題與弊端,尋求改革的正確途徑和有效措施。 勞動教養(yǎng)制度存在重大制度性缺陷：一是勞動教養(yǎng)制度的法律依據(jù)不足；二是勞教的性質(zhì)與其實際嚴厲程度不相匹配。限制被勞教人員的人身自由期限長達1-3年,最高可達4年。剝奪人身自由的強度雖與監(jiān)獄有所區(qū)別,但從本質(zhì)無異的情況來看,其性質(zhì)與刑事處罰無異。在與刑罰相銜接時,勞教處罰更加嚴厲。一些不夠適用短期徒刑或拘役、管制的對象,卻可以決定實行長達1-3年、甚至4年的勞教；三是勞教的審批和管理缺乏必要的司法程序和司法監(jiān)督。 改革勞動教養(yǎng)制度的思路是：一要適用條件法定化；二是要勞教處分輕緩化；三是要執(zhí)行手段多樣化；四是要勞教程序司法化。堅持的原則是：一是必須始終堅持依法治國的原則；二是堅持保障人權(quán)與維護社會秩序相統(tǒng)一、相均衡的原則；三是堅持統(tǒng)一、完整、全面、規(guī)范立法的原則；四是堅持積極穩(wěn)妥改革的原則。 在改革與完善勞動教養(yǎng)制度,使勞動教養(yǎng)制度司法化,盡快出臺《違法行為矯治法》的具體實踐中,有四項內(nèi)容是必須重點改革的：一是要改革勞動教養(yǎng)制度的性質(zhì)；二是要改革勞動教養(yǎng)制度的收容對象；三是要改革勞動教養(yǎng)制度的審批程序；四是要改革勞動教養(yǎng)制度的管理方式。這一切的前提,是必須盡快通過《違法行為矯治法》,使這項制度有法可依,加快立法的進程可先小范圍嘗試,再地方先行,最后在全國推廣。
[Abstract]:As a system that has existed in our country for more than 50 years, the system of re-education through labor can be said to have distinct Chinese characteristics. Whether it conforms to the requirements of a country governed by the rule of law has become an increasingly high-profile issue. In particular, with the deepening of China's reform and opening up, and in the course of increasing international dialogue and exchanges on human rights, The rule of law of reeducation through labor has become a more urgent hot issue. The theory of abolition and perfection of the system of re-education through labor is colliding with each other. But the emergence of a system has its specific historical basis. Therefore, the investigation of the rationality of its existence must be based on a specific space-time background as the main basis of judgment. Therefore, the system of re-education through labour cannot be simply obliterated, nor can the malpractice of tenure be developed without modification, but it should be carefully investigated. The main problems and disadvantages of this system are analyzed, and the correct ways and effective measures of reform are sought. There are major institutional defects in the system of re-education through labor: first, the legal basis of the system is insufficient; second, the nature of re-education through labour does not match its actual severity. Up to four years. Although the intensity of deprivation of personal liberty is different from that of prisons, the nature of deprivation of person is no different from that of criminal punishment in terms of its nature. The punishment of reeducation through labour is more severe. Some of the objects under control are not suitable for short term imprisonment or criminal detention, but they may decide to carry out reeducation through labour for 1-3 years or even 4 years; third, the examination and approval and management of reeducation through labour lacks the necessary judicial procedure and judicial supervision. The train of thought of reforming the system of reeducation through labor is as follows: first, to apply conditions and legalization; second, to slow down the punishment of re-education through labor; third, to diversify the means of implementation; Fourth, the judicial process of re-education through labour. The principles to be adhered to are: first, the principle of governing the country according to law must always be adhered to; second, the principle of unity and balance between safeguarding human rights and maintaining social order; and third, the principle of unity, integrity, and comprehensiveness. Fourth, adhere to the principle of positive and steady reform. In the concrete practice of reforming and perfecting the system of reeducation through labor, making the system of reeducation through labor judicature and issuing the Law of Correction of illegal acts as soon as possible, there are four contents that must be reformed: first, to reform the nature of the system of re-education through labor; The second is to reform the receiving object of the re-education through labor system; the third is to reform the examination and approval procedure of the re-education through labor system; and the fourth is to reform the management method of the re-education through labor system. It is necessary to pass the Law on Correction of illegal acts as soon as possible, so that this system can be governed by laws, and the process of speeding up legislation can be tried in a small scope first, followed by places first, and finally popularized throughout the country.
【學位授予單位】：湖南師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D926.8

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 夏宗素;勞動教養(yǎng)走向違法行為矯治[J];中國司法;2005年04期

2 儲槐植;議論勞動教養(yǎng)制度改革[J];中國司法;2005年05期

3 姜金芳;芻議勞動教養(yǎng)立法的必要性[J];當代司法;1998年02期

4 劉仁文;勞動教養(yǎng)亟需立法[J];法學雜志;1998年05期

5 魏曉鵬;對勞動教養(yǎng)工作的調(diào)查[J];法學雜志;1998年06期

6 陳忠林;;我國勞動教養(yǎng)制度的法律困境、價值危機與改革方向——關(guān)于制定《強制性社會預(yù)防措施法》的設(shè)想[J];法學家;2004年04期

7 沈福俊;關(guān)于廢除勞動教養(yǎng)制度的思考[J];法學;1999年07期

8 曹尋真;;勞動教養(yǎng)制度存廢的法哲學思考[J];法制與社會;2009年19期

9 張紅菊;對我國勞動教養(yǎng)制度的反思[J];甘肅行政學院學報;2004年04期

10 趙秉志,赫興旺,顏茂昆,肖中華;中國刑法修改若干問題研究[J];法學研究;1996年05期

，

本文編號：1642829