發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-06 07:37

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 商會(huì)調(diào)解 法院調(diào)解 司法確認(rèn) 聯(lián)合調(diào)解　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),伴隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展,市場(chǎng)主體日益多元化,紛繁復(fù)雜的商事糾紛不計(jì)其數(shù),給傳統(tǒng)的訴訟糾紛解決機(jī)制帶來(lái)了很大的挑戰(zhàn)。在這樣一個(gè)背景下,一種新型非訴糾紛解決機(jī)制正在快速發(fā)展——商會(huì)調(diào)解機(jī)制,它的優(yōu)勢(shì)十分明顯,例如效率高,程序簡(jiǎn)便,成本低,更有利于糾紛當(dāng)事人的長(zhǎng)期經(jīng)營(yíng)合作。商會(huì)調(diào)解機(jī)制其實(shí)早在中國(guó)近代就已經(jīng)產(chǎn)生并迅速發(fā)展,也取得了很好的社會(huì)效果。在國(guó)際上,許多發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家也十分重視商會(huì)調(diào)解機(jī)制的研究和實(shí)踐。目前,我國(guó)商會(huì)調(diào)解正處于初步發(fā)展階段,社會(huì)公眾認(rèn)可度不高,商會(huì)調(diào)解的服務(wù)機(jī)會(huì)較法院調(diào)解、人民調(diào)解要少很多。地方商會(huì)的調(diào)解機(jī)制并不十分健全,缺乏統(tǒng)一的立法文件進(jìn)行指導(dǎo)規(guī)范�；�于目前商會(huì)調(diào)解的現(xiàn)狀,筆者試圖通過(guò)本文進(jìn)行相對(duì)全面的研究我國(guó)商會(huì)調(diào)解機(jī)制的理論基礎(chǔ),包括商會(huì)調(diào)解概念的界定、商會(huì)調(diào)解的基本特征、商會(huì)調(diào)解的類型以及商會(huì)調(diào)解的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。再采用歷史追溯的方法研究中國(guó)古代民間調(diào)解的起源、中國(guó)近代商會(huì)調(diào)解的發(fā)展以及當(dāng)代中國(guó)國(guó)際商會(huì)的發(fā)展,再通過(guò)比較分析的方法研究商會(huì)調(diào)解和法院調(diào)解、仲裁調(diào)解、人民調(diào)解之間的異同,通過(guò)比較找出商會(huì)調(diào)解機(jī)制的優(yōu)勢(shì)和不足。通過(guò)上面的研究分析后,重點(diǎn)闡述商會(huì)調(diào)解建設(shè)的一些重要問(wèn)題,包括商會(huì)調(diào)解原則的確立和商會(huì)調(diào)解效力的問(wèn)題,總結(jié)商會(huì)調(diào)解機(jī)制存在的缺陷,主要包括商會(huì)調(diào)解效力的不足、調(diào)解人員隊(duì)伍不穩(wěn)定,商會(huì)調(diào)解影響力不足,缺乏統(tǒng)一、規(guī)范的商會(huì)調(diào)解法律法規(guī)。最后針對(duì)上述缺陷,筆者試圖提出一些可行性的改革意見。目前我國(guó)商會(huì)調(diào)解面臨著一個(gè)重大的矛盾,就是我國(guó)商會(huì)調(diào)解應(yīng)當(dāng)具有的高效率、專業(yè)性的社會(huì)期待與需求同商會(huì)調(diào)解效力低之間的矛盾,這個(gè)矛盾能否妥善解決關(guān)系到商會(huì)調(diào)解機(jī)制功能的良好發(fā)揮,關(guān)系到市場(chǎng)秩序的和諧穩(wěn)定,關(guān)系到非公有制經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展。所以在最后一部分詳細(xì)的闡述了商會(huì)調(diào)解組織可以采取哪些措施來(lái)積極避免或者減少該矛盾的不利影響。一是以加強(qiáng)商會(huì)內(nèi)部自治權(quán)的方式來(lái)強(qiáng)化商會(huì)調(diào)解效力,具體包括擴(kuò)大商會(huì)影響力,提高商會(huì)監(jiān)督作用;努力培養(yǎng)出專業(yè)化、高素質(zhì)、穩(wěn)定的調(diào)解組織;不斷擴(kuò)大商會(huì)調(diào)解成果,積極爭(zhēng)取立法支持;積極探索發(fā)展互聯(lián)網(wǎng)商會(huì)調(diào)解模式來(lái)強(qiáng)化商會(huì)調(diào)解效力。二是加強(qiáng)商會(huì)調(diào)解組織與司法機(jī)關(guān)的合作,建立完善的訴調(diào)銜接機(jī)制來(lái)加強(qiáng)商會(huì)調(diào)解的效力。具體包括商會(huì)調(diào)解+司法確認(rèn)模式;訴前先行委托商會(huì)調(diào)解模式;訴訟中審判機(jī)關(guān)與商會(huì)調(diào)解聯(lián)動(dòng)模式。希望這些改革建議可以為我國(guó)商會(huì)調(diào)解機(jī)制的良好運(yùn)作和功能發(fā)揮帶來(lái)一些實(shí)踐應(yīng)用價(jià)值。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of our country's economy, the market main body is increasingly diversified, and the numerous and complicated commercial disputes have brought great challenges to the traditional litigation dispute resolution mechanism. A new type of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism is developing rapidly-Chamber of Commerce mediation mechanism. Its advantages are obvious, such as high efficiency, simple procedure and low cost. It is more conducive to the long-term business cooperation of the parties to a dispute. In fact, the mediation mechanism of the Chamber of Commerce has already emerged and developed rapidly in China as early as in modern times, and has also achieved very good social results. In the international community, Many developed countries also attach great importance to the research and practice of the mediation mechanism of the Chamber of Commerce. At present, the mediation of the Chamber of Commerce in China is at a preliminary stage of development, and the social public is not highly recognized, and the service opportunities of the Chamber of Commerce mediation are better than those of the court mediation. People's mediation is much less. The mediation mechanism of local chambers of commerce is not very sound, and there is no uniform legislative document to guide them. Based on the current situation of chamber mediation, The author tries to make a relatively comprehensive study on the theoretical basis of the mediation mechanism of the Chamber of Commerce in China, including the definition of the Conception of the Chamber of Commerce, the basic characteristics of the mediation of the Chamber of Commerce. The types of Chamber of Commerce Mediation and the practical significance of Chamber of Commerce Mediation. Then the historical tracing method is used to study the origin of Chinese ancient folk mediation, the development of modern Chinese Chamber of Commerce mediation and the development of contemporary China International Chamber of Commerce. Then through comparative analysis, the paper studies the similarities and differences between Chamber of Commerce mediation and court mediation, arbitration mediation, people's mediation, and finds out the advantages and disadvantages of the chamber's mediation mechanism through comparison. After the above research and analysis, It focuses on some important issues in the mediation construction of the Chamber of Commerce, including the establishment of the mediation principles of the Chamber of Commerce and the effectiveness of the mediation of the Chamber of Commerce, and summarizes the shortcomings of the mediation mechanism of the Chamber of Commerce, including the insufficiency of the mediation effectiveness of the Chamber of Commerce. The contingent of mediators is unstable, the Chamber of Commerce does not have enough influence in mediation, there is no uniform and standardized chamber of commerce mediation laws and regulations. The author tries to put forward some feasible reform opinions. At present, the mediation of Chinese Chamber of Commerce is faced with a major contradiction, that is, the high efficiency of the mediation of China's Chamber of Commerce. The contradiction between professional social expectation and demand and the low mediation effectiveness of the Chamber of Commerce. Whether this contradiction can be properly resolved is related to the good performance of the mediation mechanism of the Chamber of Commerce and the harmony and stability of the market order. It is related to the development of the non-public ownership economy. Therefore, in the last part, it elaborates in detail what measures can be taken by the mediation organization of the chamber of commerce to actively avoid or reduce the adverse effects of this contradiction. The first is to strengthen the internal autonomy of the chamber of commerce. To strengthen the mediation effectiveness of the Chamber of Commerce, It includes expanding the influence of the Chamber of Commerce, enhancing the supervisory role of the Chamber of Commerce, working hard to cultivate professional, high-quality and stable mediation organizations, constantly expanding the mediation results of the Chamber of Commerce, and actively seeking legislative support; Actively exploring the development of the Internet Chamber of Commerce mediation model to enhance the effectiveness of the Chamber of Commerce mediation. Second, it is necessary to strengthen the cooperation between the Chamber of Commerce mediation organization and the judiciary. To strengthen the effectiveness of the Chamber of Commerce mediation, including the judicial confirmation model of the Chamber of Commerce mediation, the pre-litigation entrustment of the Chamber of Commerce mediation model; It is hoped that these reform proposals can bring some practical application value to the good operation and function of the mediation mechanism of Chinese Chamber of Commerce.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王峰;論我國(guó)法院調(diào)解的促進(jìn)和規(guī)范[J];南京工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年03期

2 成榮鋼;桐梓縣法院調(diào)解一起蜂損索賠案[J];蜜蜂雜志;2004年11期

3 王雄文;;法院調(diào)解的價(jià)值分析[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

4 李永泉;;重構(gòu)我國(guó)法院調(diào)解制度的理性思考——以法院調(diào)解的價(jià)值目標(biāo)為導(dǎo)向[J];理論與改革;2006年06期

5 肖慶華;;對(duì)法院調(diào)解的思考[J];時(shí)代文學(xué)(雙月版);2007年03期

6 許少波;;法院調(diào)解的目的論[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年04期

7 吳英姿;;法院調(diào)解的“復(fù)興”與未來(lái)[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2007年03期

8 李瑾;李蕊;;法院調(diào)解中公平與正義的實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];科技信息(科學(xué)教研);2007年31期

9 趙旭東;;理性看待法院調(diào)解的強(qiáng)制性因素[J];法學(xué)家;2007年06期

10 翟業(yè)虎;;論法院調(diào)解失控[J];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前8條

1 李廣軍;;緊張、沖突與和諧——從法院調(diào)解協(xié)議的角度看法院調(diào)解的發(fā)展與創(chuàng)新[A];全國(guó)法院系統(tǒng)第二十二屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

2 徐莉;王志偉;;邀請(qǐng)人大代表協(xié)助法院調(diào)解的法理依據(jù)及社會(huì)價(jià)值之思考——以董老的人民司法思想創(chuàng)新法院調(diào)解工作[A];董必武法學(xué)思想研究文集（第十輯）[C];2010年

3 尚洪立;邱新華;;嫁接與耦合:法院調(diào)解正當(dāng)性的現(xiàn)實(shí)出路——以賦予當(dāng)事人程序選擇權(quán)為切入點(diǎn)[A];全國(guó)法院系統(tǒng)第二十二屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文集[C];2011年

4 劉國(guó)勝;;建立與法院調(diào)解并重的訴訟和解制度,純化合意解紛機(jī)制[A];董必武法學(xué)思想研究文集（第四輯）[C];2005年

5 王春磊;;論環(huán)境民事訴訟中的法院調(diào)解[A];林業(yè)、森林與野生動(dòng)植物資源保護(hù)法制建設(shè)研究——2004年中國(guó)環(huán)境資源法學(xué)研討會(huì)（年會(huì)）論文集（第四冊(cè)）[C];2004年

6 覃斯;;反思與構(gòu)建:法院調(diào)解之中國(guó)式困境——以司法ADR導(dǎo)入民事審前程序?yàn)槌雎穂A];探索社會(huì)主義司法規(guī)律與完善民商事法律制度研究——全國(guó)法院第23屆學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)獲獎(jiǎng)?wù)撐募�（上）[C];2011年

7 錢斌;李青春;;董必武人民司法思想與法院調(diào)解權(quán)的規(guī)范運(yùn)行[A];董必武法學(xué)思想研究文集（第十一輯·上冊(cè)）[C];2011年

8 陳宇;;論多元矛盾糾紛化解機(jī)制在社區(qū)的建構(gòu)——以杭州的實(shí)踐為例[A];“秩序與進(jìn)步：浙江社會(huì)發(fā)展60年研究”理論研討會(huì)暨2009浙江省社會(huì)學(xué)年會(huì)論文集[C];2009年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 儀征市人民法院 許儀萍 陳愷;基層法院調(diào)解之探索[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2012年

2 顧建兵 季勇;法院調(diào)解室應(yīng)規(guī)范化[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2013年

3 記者 黃潔;醫(yī)療保險(xiǎn)理賠法院調(diào)解將同步[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2013年

4 趙月虎（作者單位：濟(jì)寧市中級(jí)人民法院）;加強(qiáng)法院調(diào)解工作 服務(wù)和諧社會(huì)建設(shè)[N];濟(jì)寧日?qǐng)?bào);2005年

5 孔征兵;法院調(diào)解的基本方法[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2005年

6 徐振華;法院調(diào)解應(yīng)改革為當(dāng)事人和解[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2002年

7 梁春林 季曙光;樹立法院調(diào)解全員制新理念[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2005年

8 丁成年（陜西省榆林市中級(jí)人民法院院長(zhǎng)）;重新審視新時(shí)期的法院調(diào)解[N];人民法院報(bào);2001年

9 羽馨邋白民二;10顧客接受法院調(diào)解[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2008年

10 劉益　查興田 本報(bào)記者 楊惠;清鎮(zhèn)環(huán)保法庭法院調(diào)解與社會(huì)調(diào)解相結(jié)合[N];貴州日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 黃海濤;法院調(diào)解立法研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2008年

2 雷明貴;法院調(diào)解的實(shí)踐邏輯[D];上海大學(xué);2010年

3 閆慶霞;法院調(diào)解論[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2004年

4 鄭凱銓;參與社會(huì)管理的法院調(diào)解[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王煒;法院調(diào)解：在危機(jī)下重生與發(fā)展[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

2 周楊;法院調(diào)解的自愿與強(qiáng)制[D];湘潭大學(xué);2009年

3 李若男;法院調(diào)解研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

4 房茂利;試論法院調(diào)解的改革[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

5 霍家松;我國(guó)民事法院調(diào)解模式研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2013年

6 王艷;法院調(diào)解的實(shí)務(wù)問(wèn)題研究[D];河北大學(xué);2012年

7 宋吉宇;法院調(diào)解案件高強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行率研究[D];華北電力大學(xué);2015年

8 劉芝;論我國(guó)法院調(diào)解的運(yùn)作邏輯[D];湘潭大學(xué);2015年

9 張芊;法院調(diào)解的知識(shí)社會(huì)學(xué)研究[D];燕山大學(xué);2015年

10 劉欣;法院調(diào)解檢察監(jiān)督制度研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1493933