發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-11 01:04

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 民事糾紛解決方式 調(diào)解 訴前調(diào)解　出處：《燕山大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái)，上海、北京等地的一些法院正在嘗試一種新的調(diào)解方式：訴前調(diào)解，這是一種既具有法律約束力，又能夠維護(hù)關(guān)系和諧的糾紛解決方式。但在我國(guó)目前的民事訴訟法律中，對(duì)于訴前調(diào)解制度尚未有明確的規(guī)定，這嚴(yán)重影響了訴前調(diào)解的發(fā)展及應(yīng)用推廣。如何對(duì)訴前調(diào)解制度進(jìn)行規(guī)范，使其解決糾紛功能最大化是當(dāng)前面臨的重要任務(wù)。建立完善的訴前調(diào)解制度，對(duì)于豐富非訴糾紛解決機(jī)制，完善我國(guó)調(diào)解體系，保護(hù)當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益，具有非常重要的意義。 當(dāng)前法學(xué)界對(duì)訴前調(diào)解的概念并未達(dá)成一致意見，通過辯證地分析研究各種理論觀點(diǎn)，訴前調(diào)解適宜定義為當(dāng)事人起訴后至立案前階段的調(diào)解，這一階段的調(diào)解具有準(zhǔn)司法的性質(zhì)。但是，該制度尚處于萌芽發(fā)展階段，有許多不足之處。一方面，指導(dǎo)原則的不完善影響了其發(fā)展的方向；另一方面，立法的缺失使其缺少制度保障。在充分認(rèn)識(shí)這些問題的前提下，，深入研究美國(guó)、日本、德國(guó)及我國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)的與訴前調(diào)解相關(guān)的制度，可以為我國(guó)訴前調(diào)解制度的完善指明方向，使我們的研究少走彎路。在當(dāng)前法院案件堆積出現(xiàn)訴訟大爆炸的情況下以及黨中央構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)的大背景下，構(gòu)建完善的訴前調(diào)解制度對(duì)于解決當(dāng)前矛盾是非常有必要的。此外，隨著司法隊(duì)伍的壯大、各地訴前調(diào)解實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)的積累以及立法上出現(xiàn)確立訴前調(diào)解制度的傾向，建立完善的訴前調(diào)解制度是可行的。在以上對(duì)訴前調(diào)解制度發(fā)展的內(nèi)部條件分析與域外借鑒的基礎(chǔ)上，本文提出了應(yīng)該在訴前調(diào)解的原則、范圍、程序的啟動(dòng)、調(diào)解的效力以及和訴訟的銜接等方面完善訴前調(diào)解制度。
[Abstract]:In recent years, some courts in Shanghai, Beijing and other places are trying a new form of mediation: Pre-litigation mediation, which is both legally binding. But in the current civil litigation law of our country, there is no clear stipulation on the system of pre-litigation mediation. This has seriously affected the development and application of pre-litigation mediation. How to standardize the system of pre-litigation mediation and maximize its dispute resolution function is an important task facing at present. It is of great significance to enrich the non-litigation dispute settlement mechanism, perfect the mediation system of our country, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. At present, there is no consensus on the concept of pre-lawsuit mediation in the field of law. Through dialectical analysis and study of various theoretical viewpoints, pre-litigation mediation is defined as mediation between the parties after prosecution and before filing the case. This stage of mediation is quasi-judicial in nature. However, the system is still in its infancy and has many shortcomings. On the one hand, the imperfections of guiding principles affect the direction of its development; on the other hand, The lack of legislation makes it lack institutional protection. On the premise of fully understanding these problems, this paper makes a thorough study of the systems related to pre-litigation mediation in the United States, Japan, Germany and Taiwan. It can point out the direction for the perfection of the mediation system before litigation in our country, and make our research less detours. Under the circumstances of the huge explosion of litigation in the current court cases and the construction of a harmonious society by the Party Central Committee, It is very necessary to construct a perfect system of pre-lawsuit mediation to solve the current contradiction. In addition, with the growth of judicial team, the accumulation of practical experience in pre-litigation mediation and the tendency of legislation to establish pre-litigation mediation system, It is feasible to establish a perfect pre-lawsuit mediation system. On the basis of the above analysis of the internal conditions of the development of the pre-litigation mediation system and the overseas reference, this paper puts forward that the principles, scope and procedure of the pre-litigation mediation should be initiated. The effectiveness of mediation and the link with litigation and other aspects to improve the system of pre-litigation mediation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：燕山大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D925.14;D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邱星美;;當(dāng)代調(diào)解制度比較研究[J];比較法研究;2009年04期

2 潘劍鋒;劉哲瑋;;論法院調(diào)解與糾紛解決之關(guān)系——從構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)的角度展開[J];比較法研究;2010年04期

3 張明強(qiáng);劉明鳳;;德國(guó)民事調(diào)解制度的發(fā)展與啟示[J];中國(guó)司法;2012年05期

4 肖建華;唐玉富;;論法院調(diào)解保密原則[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年04期

5 范愉;;訴前調(diào)解與法院的社會(huì)責(zé)任 從司法社會(huì)化到司法能動(dòng)主義[J];法律適用;2007年11期

6 傅郁林;;“訴前調(diào)解”與法院的角色[J];法律適用;2009年04期

7 范愉;;訴訟與非訴訟程序銜接的若干問題——以《民事訴訟法》的修改為切入點(diǎn)[J];法律適用;2011年09期

8 章武生,張大海;論德國(guó)的起訴前強(qiáng)制調(diào)解制度[J];法商研究;2004年06期

9 趙遠(yuǎn);;困境與出路:我國(guó)訴前調(diào)解制度改革論析[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年06期

10 徐滌宇;肖陸平;;法院“調(diào)解運(yùn)動(dòng)”之反思——基于兩種文明秩序的視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 張雅婷;訴前調(diào)解機(jī)制探析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

2 趙文靜;論我國(guó)訴前調(diào)解制度的構(gòu)建[D];中央民族大學(xué);2010年

3 艾丹;我國(guó)訴前調(diào)解制度研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2011年

4 徐瑞;論訴前調(diào)解[D];河北大學(xué);2011年

5 喬二偉;論我國(guó)法院附設(shè)訴前調(diào)解[D];南京師范大學(xué);2011年

6 王海鷹;論民事訴訟訴前調(diào)解[D];青島大學(xué);2012年

7 周艷華;關(guān)于我國(guó)法院調(diào)解與美國(guó)法院附設(shè)調(diào)解之比較[D];清華大學(xué);2007年

8 張國(guó)鵬;論我國(guó)民事訴訟調(diào)解制度的改革與完善[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

9 張昌善;和諧視野下我國(guó)民事訴訟調(diào)解制度之重塑[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

10 趙大勇;論訴前調(diào)解的性質(zhì)和制度構(gòu)建[D];蘇州大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：1501870