發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-13 15:29

  本文選題：受賄罪 + 事后故意型受賄罪��； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著受賄罪犯罪行為越來(lái)越復(fù)雜,司法實(shí)踐中判定受賄罪也越來(lái)越困難,針對(duì)這類問(wèn)題,我國(guó)曾多次出臺(tái)關(guān)于貪污受賄罪的司法解釋,2016年,“兩高”出臺(tái)的《關(guān)于辦理貪污賄賂刑事案件適用法律若干問(wèn)題的解釋》中第十六條第二款規(guī)定了特殊的受賄罪犯罪故意。該類型犯罪故意的規(guī)定,與我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)的犯罪故意理論區(qū)別較大,并且由于該司法解釋沒有對(duì)國(guó)家工作人員和特定關(guān)系人所犯罪名作出規(guī)定,我國(guó)法學(xué)界對(duì)此爭(zhēng)討不休。本文中,筆者以該法條為依據(jù),運(yùn)用案例分析、類比推理、比較分析等方法,對(duì)該法條的內(nèi)容、性質(zhì)、事后故意型受賄罪和共犯問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了全面的分析。本文共分為三部分,全文三萬(wàn)兩千字,主要內(nèi)容如下:第一部分:事后故意型受賄罪規(guī)定的緣起本文這一部分以相關(guān)案例為起點(diǎn),介紹了司法實(shí)踐中存在的特定關(guān)系人參與受賄的幾個(gè)典型案例,并對(duì)這幾個(gè)案例進(jìn)行了分析,提出其中存在的問(wèn)題。隨后,本文對(duì)該法律條文的內(nèi)容,包括“特定關(guān)系人”,“退還或者上交”等進(jìn)行了分析,全面解讀該法律條款,并提出了該條款可能存在的問(wèn)題,包括該特殊的受賄罪犯罪故意比較特殊,與傳統(tǒng)的受賄罪犯罪故意區(qū)別較大,該法條只規(guī)定了犯罪故意,對(duì)于國(guó)家工作人員和特定關(guān)系人成立的罪名并沒有做出規(guī)定等等。第二部分:事后故意型受賄罪概念與特征本文這一部分主要從三個(gè)方面分析了事后故意型受賄罪,首先,事后故意型受賄罪屬于不作為犯罪,國(guó)家工作人員具有約束特定關(guān)系人退還或者上交其所收取的財(cái)物的義務(wù),不實(shí)施該義務(wù)就構(gòu)成事后故意型受賄罪;其次,本文通過(guò)對(duì)事后故意型受賄罪和傳統(tǒng)受賄罪的比較,分析了事后故意型受賄罪在主體、主觀方面和客觀方面的特殊性;最后,本文分析了事后故意型受賄罪的既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。第三部分:事后故意型受賄罪中共犯的情形本文這一部分主要分析了在事后故意型受賄罪中,由于存在特定關(guān)系人和國(guó)家工作人員兩個(gè)犯罪行為人,這兩個(gè)犯罪行為人構(gòu)成何種罪名,兩者是否構(gòu)成共犯的問(wèn)題。本文的觀點(diǎn)是如果特定關(guān)系人的受賄行為已經(jīng)實(shí)施完畢國(guó)家工作人員才知道,兩者就不成立共犯。而如果特定關(guān)系人的犯罪行為未實(shí)施完畢國(guó)家工作人員就已經(jīng)知道,卻沒有退還或者上交,那么兩者成立受賄罪共犯。
[Abstract]:As the crime of accepting bribes becomes more and more complicated, it is more and more difficult to judge the crime of accepting bribes in judicial practice. In response to this kind of problem, our country has issued many judicial explanations on the crime of corruption and bribery. In 2016, Article 16, paragraph 2, of the interpretation of the Law applicable to the Criminal cases of Corruption and bribery issued by the "two High levels" provides for the special crime of accepting bribes intentionally. The regulation of this type of criminal intent is quite different from the traditional theory of criminal intent in our country, and because the judicial explanation does not provide for the crime committed by the state functionary and the specific related person, the legal circles of our country argue about it endlessly. In this paper, based on the article, the author makes a comprehensive analysis of the content, nature, intentional bribery and accomplice of the article by using the methods of case analysis, analogy reasoning and comparative analysis. This article is divided into three parts, the full text of 32000 words, the main contents are as follows: the first part: the origin of the crime of intentional bribery after the beginning of this part of the relevant cases as the starting point, This paper introduces several typical cases in judicial practice in which the specific persons involved in bribery are involved, and analyzes these cases and puts forward the existing problems. Then, this paper analyzes the contents of the legal provisions, including "specific relationship", "return or surrender", etc., and comprehensively interprets the provisions of the law, and puts forward the possible problems of the provisions. Including the special crime of bribery is more special, and the traditional crime of bribery is quite different from the intention, the law only stipulates the crime of intent, for the national staff and the specific relationship of the charges and so on. The second part: the concept and characteristics of ex post intentional bribery. This part mainly analyzes the crime of intentional bribery after the event from three aspects. First, the crime of intentional bribery after the event belongs to the crime of omission. The state functionary has the obligation to restrain the persons concerned from returning or handing over the property they have received, and the failure to carry out this obligation constitutes the crime of accepting bribes intentionally after the event. Secondly, this paper compares the crime of accepting bribes with the crime of accepting bribes after the fact and the crime of accepting bribes. This paper analyzes the particularity of the subject, subjective and objective aspects of the crime of accepting bribes intentionally after the event; finally, this paper analyzes the standard of accomplishment of the crime of accepting bribes after the intention. The third part: the crime of intentional bribery committed by the Communist Party of China, this part mainly analyzes the crime of intentional acceptance of bribes after the event, because of the existence of specific relations and state functionaries two perpetrators, What are the two crimes and whether they constitute accomplices? The point of view of this paper is that if the state functionaries know that the bribery of a particular party has been carried out, they will not be an accomplice. But if the criminal behavior of the specific relation person is not completed the national staff already knew, but did not return or hand over, then both establish the bribery crime accomplice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D924.392

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 陳文昊;;《貪污賄賂刑事案件解釋》第十六條第二款的解釋進(jìn)路與反思[J];湖南警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年06期

2 牟大釗;;“事后受賄”構(gòu)成受賄罪的主客觀分析[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2012年11期

3 于雪婷;;受賄罪主觀罪過(guò)之分層認(rèn)定模式研究[J];法律適用;2011年12期

4 張開駿;;利用影響力受賄罪與受賄罪的共犯問(wèn)題研究[J];政治與法律;2010年09期

5 徐留成;;受賄罪既遂與未遂的疑難問(wèn)題研究[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年05期

6 石磊;;“為他人謀取利益”要件的反思[J];重慶工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年12期

7 莊建波;;刑事訴訟法規(guī)定的近親屬范圍應(yīng)該擴(kuò)大[J];人民檢察;2006年16期

8 劉紅梅;受賄罪主觀形態(tài)新探[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2001年12期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 顧曉敏;劉華敏;;“特定關(guān)系人”受賄共犯范圍須嚴(yán)格限定[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

2 張明楷;;如何區(qū)分注意規(guī)定與法律擬制[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 盧向超;特定關(guān)系人參與共同受賄犯罪若干問(wèn)題研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2014年

2 王奕波;受賄罪既遂標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[D];南昌大學(xué);2014年

3 賴燕娜;論犯罪故意的認(rèn)識(shí)因素[D];廣西大學(xué);2013年

4 朱志闖;犯罪故意意志因素比較研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2014490