論過失犯的實(shí)行行為
[Abstract]:In our country, negligence crime, whether in criminal law legislation or criminal law theory, because it is entangled with the implementation of intentional crime, whether it is established or not depends on the occurrence of the result of actual harm to a large extent. And almost, after the result of the actual harm, once the perpetrator can be identified subjective fault, that is, the establishment of negligence crime. Under the background of profound changes in Chinese society, the above structure of negligence crime has been difficult to give full play to the function of the constituent elements of crime, and the scope of punishment for negligence crime has been improperly expanded. At the same time, the definition of harmful behavior in the constituent elements of coupled crime in our country goes back and forth with other constituent elements, and the logic is confused, which fails to reserve enough space for structural negligence. The independence of negligence crime is closely related to the evolution of behavior theory in German and Japanese criminal law. The birth of the theory of objective behavior marks the collapse of the dualistic system of objective illegality and subjective criminal responsibility. Negligence no longer simply exists in the stage of responsibility, but also affects the stage of illegality. Therefore, the structure of negligence crime with the duty of care as the core has been widely recognized. With the in-depth study of causality, the objective imputation theory to solve the problem of negligence crime, its own logical framework has become more and more accurate, and has developed into an objective imputation system corresponding to subjective imputation, covering the constitution of crime, causality and illegal evaluation. This paper is divided into three chapters, the purport is to construct the implementation of negligence crime, so the introduction of negligence crime and criminal behavior theory is indispensable. The first chapter undertakes the task of briefly describing the theory of negligence crime and criminal behavior, and analyzes the behavior theory at home and abroad, and explains the basic functions that the concept of behavior should undertake. After that, it is necessary to further explore the behavior of negligence crime, which is the main content of the second chapter. The second chapter is responsible for introducing and evaluating the four typical theories of negligence in Germany and Japan, expounding the standards and advantages and disadvantages of each theory in identifying the behavior of negligence, and mainly analyzing the new theory of negligence and the theory of objective imputation. The third chapter, on the basis of the above two chapters, constructs the identification standard of the behavior of delinquent crime in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2016
【分類號(hào)】:D924
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 孫仁丕;;論實(shí)行行為的相對(duì)性[J];通化師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年01期
2 何榮功;;實(shí)行行為的分類與解釋論綱[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2007年03期
3 趙俊甫;;過失實(shí)行行為研究[J];中國刑事法雜志;2004年06期
4 黃麗勤,周銘川;試論實(shí)行行為[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期
5 周銘川;黃麗勤;;論刑法中的實(shí)行行為[J];許昌學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期
6 周銘川;黃麗勤;;論實(shí)行行為的存在范圍與歸責(zé)原則的修正[J];中國刑事法雜志;2005年05期
7 黃渝景;;罪刑法定視角下的實(shí)行行為研究[J];江西金融職工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期
8 何榮功;;論實(shí)行行為的本質(zhì)[J];刑法論叢;2007年01期
9 張小虎;;犯罪實(shí)行行為之解析[J];政治與法律;2007年02期
10 彭鵬;吳超;;試論刑法理論中的實(shí)行行為[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年04期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 江蘇省吳江市人民檢察院 周春榮;非實(shí)行行為的教唆自殺不構(gòu)成犯罪[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2009年
2 江西省龍南縣人民檢察院 王恰;疑案定性宜采“實(shí)行行為分析法”[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2011年
3 呂超 ;犯罪是否著手的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2012年
4 黃殿晶;妙齡女勒死性侵犯者[N];中國社會(huì)報(bào);2002年
5 王磊;吸毒導(dǎo)致神智異常后的殺人行為是否構(gòu)成故意殺人罪[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2011年
6 金為群;想搶房客先殺老板:如何定性[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2006年
7 付英 王豐;迎考復(fù)習(xí)百題答疑(三)[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2004年
8 胡元峰;是否犯罪的實(shí)行行為[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年
9 侯菁菁;預(yù)謀分頭盜竊是否構(gòu)成共同犯罪[N];西部法制報(bào);2014年
10 趙屹;混合主體在共同受賄中各自的地位[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2006年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 朱平;刑法實(shí)行行為論[D];中國政法大學(xué);2007年
2 任海濤;承繼共犯研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 王瑞;損害商業(yè)信譽(yù)、商品聲譽(yù)罪之實(shí)行行為研究[D];海南大學(xué);2016年
2 崔志偉;實(shí)行行為定型性及其符合判斷[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年
3 溫暉;實(shí)行行為著手標(biāo)準(zhǔn)之研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年
4 趙海川;以客觀歸責(zé)為視角論過失實(shí)行行為[D];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué);2016年
5 朱學(xué)軍;客觀歸責(zé)與過失實(shí)行行為研究[D];清華大學(xué);2015年
6 王李夫;論過失犯的實(shí)行行為[D];廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2016年
7 周長(zhǎng)生;論實(shí)行行為[D];黑龍江大學(xué);2008年
8 詹勇;客觀歸責(zé)理論視野下的過失實(shí)行行為研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年
9 王璐;論故意犯罪實(shí)行行為的著手[D];山東大學(xué);2010年
10 胡波;強(qiáng)迫交易罪實(shí)行行為探析[D];湘潭大學(xué);2009年
,本文編號(hào):2511798
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/falvlunwen/xingfalunwen/2511798.html