美國(guó)主流智庫(kù)對(duì)“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略的認(rèn)知探析
[Abstract]:In September and October 2013, President Xi Jinping visited Kazakhstan and Indonesia, where he put forward the "Silk Road Economic Belt" and the "21st Century Maritime Silk Road" ("Belt and Road") initiative, which became a national strategy of China. The relationship between China and the United States is the most complicated and crucial one in the 21 st century. As the most developed and powerful political country in the world, how the United States views the "Belt and Road" strategy will influence the attitude and cognition of the countries along the route to a certain extent, and then affect the future promotion and implementation of the strategy. Although the US authorities have given less explicit response to the "Belt and Road" strategy, we can analyze the views of scholars in a think-tank known as the "outside brain" of American political decision-making. Then, to some extent, the official attitude of the United States was explored. American think-tanks play an important role in the formulation of foreign policy. On the one hand, they directly influence foreign political decisions through the "revolving door" mechanism, and on the other hand, they propagate through the mass media. Hold seminars and other ways to guide public opinion and trends of thought, indirectly affect government decisions. The Brookings Institution, the Carnegie Foundation for International Peace, the Heritage Foundation and the American Progressive Center are famous American think-tanks with authoritative experts on China. This paper selects the review articles of the four mainstream think-tanks from 2015 to present on the official website, quoting paragraphs and so on, as analysis samples, combs and builds the cognitive framework of the "Belt and Road" strategy of mainstream think-tank scholars, and on this basis, This paper sums up the overall judgment of "Belt and Road" strategy by American mainstream think-tank from the perspective of Sino-American comparison, and tries to find out the possible policies that the American government may adopt to "Belt and Road" strategy in the future. On the whole, although there are some rational and objective views in the US think-tank, they are more sceptical about China's motivation to implement this strategy, and believe that the "Belt and Road" strategy is conducive to enhancing China's international influence. The competition between China and the United States brings challenges to America's leading position in the Asia-Pacific region. In the short term, the United States may still be taking a wait-and-see approach, but in the long run it prefers to constrain, counterbalance or even undermine the progress and implementation of China's strategy. America's temporary wait-and-see just leaves China with room and time to act. At present, China not only needs to further communicate and exchange with the United States through existing bilateral or multilateral mechanisms, but also should take some concrete measures to strengthen Sino-US cooperation. At the same time, it makes it more difficult for the United States to interfere or influence the "Belt and Road" strategy, and actively promotes the implementation of the "Belt and Road" strategy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:C932
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)"一帶一路"建設(shè)進(jìn)展課題組;劉偉;王文;何帆;賈晉京;相均泳;劉英;;堅(jiān)持規(guī)劃引領(lǐng) 有序務(wù)實(shí)推進(jìn) “一帶一路”建設(shè)進(jìn)展報(bào)告[J];中國(guó)發(fā)展觀察;2016年Z1期
2 翟東航;于洋;曹安陽(yáng);;世界著名智庫(kù)概覽[J];政工導(dǎo)刊;2016年07期
3 魏敏;;土耳其對(duì)“一帶一路”倡議的認(rèn)知及對(duì)策建議[J];國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)合作;2016年05期
4 崔日明;陳晨;;美國(guó)“新絲綢之路”戰(zhàn)略研究——基于中國(guó)“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略比較[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治論壇;2016年03期
5 田春榮;;2015年中國(guó)石油進(jìn)出口狀況分析[J];國(guó)際石油經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年03期
6 黃鳳志;劉瑞;;日本對(duì)“一帶一路”的認(rèn)知與應(yīng)對(duì)[J];現(xiàn)代國(guó)際關(guān)系;2015年11期
7 劉佳;石莉;孫瑞杰;;2015年美國(guó)《21世紀(jì)海上力量合作戰(zhàn)略》評(píng)析[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2015年10期
8 吳飛;;流動(dòng)的中國(guó)國(guó)家形象:“中國(guó)威脅論”的緣起與演變[J];南京社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年09期
9 李秀蛟;;俄羅斯智庫(kù)專家對(duì)“一帶一路”的評(píng)析[J];西伯利亞研究;2015年03期
10 杜蘭;;“一帶一路”倡議:美國(guó)的認(rèn)知和可能應(yīng)對(duì)[J];新視野;2015年02期
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條
1 李克強(qiáng);;在第十屆亞歐首腦會(huì)議第一次全會(huì)上的發(fā)言[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2014年
2 習(xí)近平;;攜手建設(shè)中國(guó)—東盟命運(yùn)共同體[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2013年
3 習(xí)近平;;弘揚(yáng)人民友誼 共創(chuàng)美好未來(lái)[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2013年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 張春;美國(guó)思想庫(kù)對(duì)美國(guó)“一個(gè)中國(guó)”政策的影響[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2006年
,本文編號(hào):2118788
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/guanlilunwen/glzh/2118788.html