發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-06 19:26

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定及市場(chǎng)支配地位認(rèn)定法律問(wèn)題研究　出處：《北京郵電大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè) 相關(guān)市場(chǎng) 互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái) 市場(chǎng)支配地位 用戶數(shù)量

【摘要】：本文以奇虎訴騰訊濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位一案為視角和切入點(diǎn),在分析互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)新特點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上,指出互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)疊加式與平行式業(yè)務(wù)結(jié)構(gòu)分類以及以互聯(lián)網(wǎng)平臺(tái)為競(jìng)爭(zhēng)實(shí)現(xiàn)載體和以用戶資源為直接目標(biāo)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)本質(zhì)等特點(diǎn)給相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定、市場(chǎng)支配地位認(rèn)定以及濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位行為的判斷上帶來(lái)的巨大挑戰(zhàn)。并結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外反壟斷法的理論和實(shí)踐,對(duì)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)反壟斷司法實(shí)踐中遇到的困境提出自己一些不太成熟的建議。首先,將互聯(lián)網(wǎng)企業(yè)的反壟斷糾紛分為相同業(yè)務(wù)結(jié)構(gòu)企業(yè)之間與不同業(yè)務(wù)結(jié)構(gòu)之間兩種,分別適用不同的相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定方法。其次,對(duì)于互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)的市場(chǎng)支配地位認(rèn)定,應(yīng)當(dāng)改變測(cè)算方法,以用戶為指標(biāo)。最后,通過(guò)加強(qiáng)被告舉證責(zé)任以改變?cè)�告舉證困難的局面。
[Abstract]:Based on the case of Qihu v. Tencent abusing its dominant position in the market, this paper analyzes the new characteristics of Internet industry. It is pointed out that the characteristics of Internet enterprise superposition and parallel service structure classification, the competitive nature of Internet platform as the carrier of competition and the direct target of user resources define the relevant market. The determination of market dominant position and the judgment of abuse of market dominant position bring great challenges, and combine the theory and practice of anti-monopoly law at home and abroad. To the Internet industry antitrust judicial practice encountered difficulties to put forward their own some immature suggestions. First of all. The antitrust disputes of Internet enterprises are divided into two types: the same business structure and the different business structures, which respectively apply to different relevant market definition methods. Secondly. As to the market dominant position of Internet industry, we should change the calculation method and take the user as the index. Finally, by strengthening the burden of proof of the defendant, we can change the situation that the plaintiff is difficult to prove.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北京郵電大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D922.294

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 時(shí)建中;王偉煒;;《反壟斷法》中相關(guān)市場(chǎng)的含義及其界定[J];重慶社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年04期

2 王曉曄;戒律強(qiáng)勢(shì)——?dú)W共體競(jìng)爭(zhēng)法中的濫用市場(chǎng)支配地位[J];國(guó)際貿(mào)易;2000年05期

3 蔣巖波;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)中相關(guān)市場(chǎng)界定的司法困境與出路——基于雙邊市場(chǎng)條件[J];法學(xué)家;2012年06期

4 葉明;;互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)市場(chǎng)支配地位的認(rèn)定困境及其破解路徑[J];法商研究;2014年01期

5 丁茂中;;論SSNIP測(cè)試法與相關(guān)市場(chǎng)的界定[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)法論叢;2008年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1389212