C2C電子商務交易主體信譽評估模型研究
[Abstract]:E-commerce has come into being with the rapid development of Internet and information technology, and has experienced the process of sprout, exploration and gradual expansion, which has developed rapidly all over the world. With the concept of "Internet" put forward, the economic development of "e-commerce" has become increasingly obvious, e-commerce has penetrated into all aspects of different industries. C2C model as one of the most important model of e-commerce, The traditional face to face consumption mode of transaction entity has been changed, but because of the characteristics of asymmetric information among different entities, there are certain risks in the transaction. Mutual trust between trading entities is the prerequisite for both parties to reach a transaction. However, with the development of C2C electronic commerce, a large number of "fraudulent" trading entities have emerged, and the credit problem has become the bottleneck of its sustainable development. How to construct C-2 C e-commerce credit evaluation system is concerned by business circles and scholars. In order to reduce the transaction risk between entities, improve the transaction efficiency of both parties, and promote the healthy development of C2C e-commerce, this paper sets up a credit evaluation model to evaluate the credit of buyers and sellers in all directions and accurately from the perspective of creating an honest trading environment. The main work includes the following three parts: the first part, introduces the C2C e-commerce reputation related theory and the trading subject reputation formation mechanism, summarizes and analyzes the existing trading subject reputation evaluation mechanism and model. This paper focuses on the credit evaluation mechanism of the improved way and the principles of the establishment of the model. The second part, according to the C2C e-commerce website transaction flow, from the initial registration, transaction goods and returned goods to the buyer and seller credit evaluation study, respectively, build evaluation buy, seller initial reputation, The weighted model of transaction reputation, return credit and comprehensive reputation. Deeply analyze the dynamic utility of transaction value utility factor, feedback evaluation accuracy utility factor, time utility factor and return rate utility factor in evaluating buyer's reputation. This paper focuses on the dynamic utility of transaction value utility factor, reliability utility factor, time utility factor and return rate utility factor when evaluating seller's reputation. The third part simulates the trading environment and verifies the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed model by numerical examples. The experiment shows that, in this paper, the seller's reputation evaluation model can make up for the deficiency of traditional reputation evaluation model which can not evaluate the initial reputation of the trading body, and the reputation value of the seller in different periods can also be compared. And has better credit differentiation ability; The dynamic value of buyer's reputation can effectively identify the types of fraud taken by non-honest buyers, and the seller's reputation evaluation model has strong ability in preventing "reputation fraud", "credit collusion" and "reputation denigration".
【學位授予單位】:內(nèi)蒙古大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2016
【分類號】:F724.6
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 陳榮章;馬志強;;基于多屬性態(tài)度模型的二手車交易主體分析[J];北京汽車;2012年03期
2 張亦春;孫君明;;限售股解禁下A股市場各交易主體行為分析與市場對策研究[J];經(jīng)濟學動態(tài);2008年07期
3 吳懷福;陳英箱;;網(wǎng)絡交易主體登記管理探索[J];中國工商管理研究;2010年09期
4 王福蕊;李南;;略論短線交易主體[J];時代金融;2013年32期
5 沈立群;;產(chǎn)權(quán)經(jīng)紀機構(gòu)要規(guī)范執(zhí)業(yè)[J];上海國資;2006年04期
6 胡維佳;徐婷婷;吳曉光;張華;;兩會好聲音[J];中國經(jīng)濟周刊;2014年10期
7 于建忠;;交易主體同質(zhì)效應對債券定價的影響[J];中國貨幣市場;2008年05期
8 陳志武;;從金融大國到金融強國[J];商界(評論);2009年12期
9 劉明;不良經(jīng)濟信用產(chǎn)生的四個原因[J];發(fā)展研究;2003年12期
10 張珊珊;徐建雪;王育才;;排污權(quán)的法律性質(zhì)定位及其對交易主體的利益保護[J];商業(yè)時代;2012年03期
相關會議論文 前1條
1 林奕藩;;工商海上監(jiān)管的探索[A];實踐與思考——二OO四學會文集[C];2004年
相關重要報紙文章 前10條
1 馬龍生;農(nóng)民應成為土地交易主體[N];證券時報;2012年
2 王斌;鄭棉期市交易主體分析[N];期貨日報;2005年
3 中國石油大學能源專家 郭慶方;油價預期中的真真假假[N];中國石油報;2009年
4 本報記者 毛建宇;加強信用評級建設和交易主體監(jiān)控[N];中國證券報;2013年
5 本報記者 鈕鍵軍;外匯交易主體擴容 外貿(mào)公司慎觀其變[N];財經(jīng)時報;2004年
6 石新中;構(gòu)建維護誠信的法律體系[N];人民日報;2013年
7 記者 唐穎豪;滬交易主體轉(zhuǎn)向自住[N];房地產(chǎn)時報;2006年
8 本報通訊員 宋晨;快遞助力發(fā)票犯罪[N];檢察日報;2013年
9 特約評論員 劉曉忠;港交所掌舵LME贏在戰(zhàn)略至上[N];21世紀經(jīng)濟報道;2012年
10 特約評論員 劉曉忠;返利亂象:野蠻成長下的致命誘惑[N];21世紀經(jīng)濟報道;2012年
相關碩士學位論文 前8條
1 陳起陽;內(nèi)幕交易主體問題實證研究[D];吉林大學;2016年
2 張揚;C2C電子商務交易主體信譽評估模型研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學;2016年
3 王愛華;中國林業(yè)碳匯交易主體法律權(quán)益保障研究[D];西南政法大學;2012年
4 翟書曉;我國內(nèi)幕交易主體法律問題研究[D];西南政法大學;2012年
5 鄭琦斐;從“瑞銀訴Paramax對沖基金案”看我國信用違約掉期監(jiān)管[D];暨南大學;2011年
6 李姣;電子商務主體信息可信度研究[D];復旦大學;2013年
7 楊琳;西安龍益4S店二手車交易模式設計與應用研究[D];西安建筑科技大學;2014年
8 楊曉蓮;證券市場內(nèi)幕交易若干問題的法律分析[D];中國社會科學院研究生院;2012年
,本文編號:2326342
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/jingjilunwen/guojimaoyilunwen/2326342.html