發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-02 03:51

  本文選題：韓美同盟 + 朝鮮半島統(tǒng)一��； 參考：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2004年博士論文

【摘要】：朝鮮半島是美日中俄的利益和影響最密集的交匯點(diǎn),世界上沒有任何地方受大國(guó)的影 響可與之相比。朝鮮半島的近代史清楚地證明了這一點(diǎn)。但是本文的研究反對(duì)將朝鮮半島看 作因變量,作者認(rèn)為朝鮮半島局勢(shì)是一個(gè)影響地區(qū)和國(guó)際結(jié)構(gòu)動(dòng)態(tài)的自變量。 基于冷戰(zhàn)對(duì)立而造成的韓美同盟,使得兩國(guó)關(guān)系在整個(gè)冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)期都處于極不正常的狀 態(tài)之下。以“駐韓美軍”為主要象征的韓美兩國(guó)之間的非對(duì)稱關(guān)系正確地反映了朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)后 的朝鮮半島局勢(shì)以及韓美兩國(guó)之間力量對(duì)比的客觀情況。但目前客觀情況已有了很大的變 化。隨著南北之間的緩和,特別是南北首腦會(huì)議后,這種趨勢(shì)更加明顯,作為駐韓美軍駐軍 的直接原因的“朝鮮的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)威脅論”已在很大程度上減少。大部分韓國(guó)民眾不再把朝鮮看成 實(shí)實(shí)在在的“威脅”,其次,隨著國(guó)際經(jīng)濟(jì)的相互依存越來越增加,軍事安全因素的價(jià)值日 漸減少。此外,韓國(guó)綜合國(guó)力不斷發(fā)展。過去的“非對(duì)稱性”韓美關(guān)系喪失了內(nèi)部動(dòng)力。韓 美兩國(guó)應(yīng)擺脫非對(duì)稱性的關(guān)系而走向?qū)ΨQ性的兩國(guó)關(guān)系。 駐韓美軍問題并不只是一個(gè)單純的軍事問題,而是一個(gè)帶有全局性意義的戰(zhàn)略性問題, 是美國(guó)對(duì)于未來東北亞地區(qū)乃至整個(gè)亞太地區(qū)安全戰(zhàn)略的一種總體規(guī)劃。決定駐韓美軍未來 走向的因素有朝鮮半島統(tǒng)一的過程、美國(guó)的世界戰(zhàn)略、周邊大國(guó)對(duì)駐韓美軍的態(tài)度、韓國(guó)民 眾的反美情緒以及在東北亞地區(qū)建立安全合作機(jī)制的過程等。在這種分析的基礎(chǔ)上,本文對(duì) 駐韓美軍未來走向進(jìn)行探討。本文在承認(rèn)美國(guó)是唯一超級(jí)大國(guó)的前提下,認(rèn)為韓國(guó)的安全與 防務(wù)是可以自主的。但是本文試圖克服以民族主義為主的主觀主義觀點(diǎn)。本文作者也不是主 張美軍不現(xiàn)實(shí)地立即從韓國(guó)撤退,而是從統(tǒng)一后韓國(guó)如何實(shí)現(xiàn)自主外交的長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)目標(biāo)的角度來 力求利用新的思維,尋求一種新的方案。本文認(rèn)為:在解決駐韓美軍問題時(shí),韓國(guó)應(yīng)該努力 尋求多邊合作安全模式作為替代。在朝鮮半島實(shí)現(xiàn)統(tǒng)一或者建立東北亞安全合作機(jī)制后,駐 韓美軍應(yīng)該撤離。但如果統(tǒng)一韓國(guó)與美國(guó)通過協(xié)商承認(rèn)該地區(qū)的美軍的作用,那么其駐軍的 形式應(yīng)為美軍獲準(zhǔn)使用韓國(guó)的軍事基地。
[Abstract]:The Korean Peninsula is the most concentrated intersection between the United States, Japan, China and Russia. There is no place in the world under the influence of big powers.
The modern history of the Korean Peninsula clearly proves this point. However, the study of this article is against the Korean Peninsula.
As a dependent variable, the author believes that the situation on the Korean Peninsula is an independent variable that affects the dynamics of regional and international structures.
The Korean American alliance, based on the Cold War confrontation, made the two countries' relations extremely abnormal in the whole cold war era.
Under the situation, the asymmetrical relationship between Korea and the United States, which is the main symbol of the US armed forces, correctly reflects the post Korean War.
The situation on the Korean Peninsula and the objective comparison of the strength contrast between Korea and the United States.
With the easing of the north and south, especially after the North South Summit, this trend is more obvious, as the garrison of the US troops stationed in Korea.
The direct cause of the "war threat theory of North Korea" has been largely reduced. Most Koreans no longer regard North Korea as a matter of fact.
The real threat is, secondly, with the increasing interdependence of international economy, the value of military security factors.
Gradually, the comprehensive national strength of South Korea has been developing. The past "asymmetric" relationship between South Korea and the United States has lost its internal power.
The United States and the United States should move out of the asymmetric relationship and move towards the symmetrical bilateral relations.
The issue of US troops in Korea is not just a purely military issue, but a strategic issue with overall significance.
It is a general plan of the United States for the future security strategy of Northeast Asia and the whole Asia Pacific region.
The factors that lead to the Korean Peninsula are the unification of the Korean Peninsula, the United States' world strategy and the attitude of the neighboring powers to the US armed forces, Han Guomin.
The anti American sentiment and the process of establishing a security cooperation mechanism in Northeast Asia are analyzed in this paper.
The future trend of US troops in Korea is discussed. In recognition of the fact that the United States is the only superpower, this article considers South Korea's security and
Defense is autonomous. But this article attempts to overcome nationalism based subjectivism.
Zhang Meijun unrealistically withdrew from Korea immediately, but from the perspective of the long-term goal of South Korea's independent diplomacy after reunification.
In order to solve the problem of US troops in Korea, we should strive for new ideas.
Seeking multilateral cooperation security mode as an alternative.
The US military should withdraw, but if it unify South Korea and the United States through consultations to recognize the role of the US forces in the area, then its garrison will be stationed.
The US military should be allowed to use South Korea's military base.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2004
【分類號(hào)】：D731

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 劉銀萍;;韓國(guó)反美主義研究的現(xiàn)狀與前景[A];世界近現(xiàn)代史研究（第六輯）[C];2009年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉銀萍;民族主義與韓國(guó)反美主義[D];南開大學(xué);2010年

2 高奇琦;美韓核關(guān)系（1956年-2006年）：對(duì)同盟矛盾性的個(gè)案考察[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 常進(jìn);戰(zhàn)后初期駐韓美軍的歷史考察（1945—1953）[D];西南大學(xué);2011年

2 李丹;朝鮮半島安全局勢(shì)的演變與駐韓美軍的未來[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2011年

3 羅旭婷;盧武鉉政府“東北亞均衡者”論和韓美同盟的未來[D];上海國(guó)際問題研究所;2008年

4 王帥;冷戰(zhàn)后美韓軍事同盟關(guān)系的演進(jìn)[D];遼寧大學(xué);2010年

5 宋佳琳;美日韓三邊關(guān)系的強(qiáng)化及其走勢(shì)分析[D];吉林大學(xué);2012年

6 王俊濤;“沖突”與“合作”：冷戰(zhàn)后中美朝鮮半島地緣戰(zhàn)略比較研究[D];河南大學(xué);2012年

7 千美花;美韓同盟的新變化對(duì)東北亞安全格局的影響[D];延邊大學(xué);2012年

8 辛準(zhǔn);駐韓美軍“戰(zhàn)略靈活性”調(diào)整及其影響[D];延邊大學(xué);2012年

9 張?jiān)苹?軍事外交對(duì)建立亞太安全機(jī)制的影響[D];延邊大學(xué);2012年

10 胡良孟;韓國(guó)自主國(guó)防研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1832259