發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-07 07:20

  本文選題：清代 + 州縣官員　； 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：國計(jì)民生,首重財(cái)賦。而人丁地土,乃財(cái)賦根部。州縣官一職,集國家之倉庫、百姓之身家于一人之手,同時(shí),財(cái)賦稅收又是州縣官考成最重要的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。因此,州縣官的財(cái)政責(zé)任于己于民于國家皆有非常重要的意義。關(guān)于清代州縣官責(zé)任研究,學(xué)界先輩多有探討官員的司法責(zé)任,或者官員征稅的角色。相對而言,對州縣官員的財(cái)政責(zé)任研究顯得薄弱,加上該研究涉及經(jīng)濟(jì)史、社會(huì)史的眾多因素,更加限制了這一課題的研究。鑒于此,本文以州縣官的財(cái)政責(zé)任為研究對象,借助清朝會(huì)典、則例、律例等文獻(xiàn)資料,通過對州縣官的具體財(cái)政責(zé)任及其追究的梳理總結(jié),使我們更加了解認(rèn)識(shí)州縣官這一角色以及他在財(cái)政責(zé)任上為難尷尬的處境。本論文共分為五個(gè)部分:第一部分,緒論。主要介紹本論文的選題緣由及研究價(jià)值、學(xué)術(shù)史回顧、研究內(nèi)容與基本資料方法,重難點(diǎn)所在。第二部分,即第一章——清代財(cái)政管理體制概述,主要介紹清代有關(guān)各級財(cái)政組織及其職能。本章又內(nèi)分三部分:依次介紹了中央機(jī)構(gòu)及職能、地方財(cái)政官員及職能和基層鄉(xiāng)村的稅收組織。第三部分,即第二章——清代州縣及其官員財(cái)政責(zé)任。本章又分為四個(gè)部分:第一部分回顧了州縣官員的職掌;第二部分主要介紹清朝的賦稅征收范圍;第三和第四部分詳細(xì)介紹了州縣官的起運(yùn)存留責(zé)任和交待報(bào)銷責(zé)任的內(nèi)容,該兩部分是本文的主要內(nèi)容之一。第四部分,即第三章——州縣官員的財(cái)政責(zé)任追究。該章節(jié)內(nèi)分三小部分,第一和第二部分主要介紹官員財(cái)政責(zé)任追究的主要類型和一般程序;在此基礎(chǔ)上,第三部分詳細(xì)介紹針對州縣官的財(cái)政責(zé)任追究的內(nèi)容,主要從戶口田畝、催征、漕運(yùn)與鹽課四個(gè)方面論述,反映了州縣官員來自繁瑣性法令的壓力和履行責(zé)任的強(qiáng)制性,該部分是本文的重點(diǎn)之一。第五部分,即第四章——州縣官員的財(cái)政責(zé)任及其追究評析,這是本文的難點(diǎn)所在。該章節(jié)第一部分從兩個(gè)角度,即保證國家財(cái)力、懲治吏治腐敗,簡要說明了官員責(zé)任追究制度產(chǎn)生的積極作用。第二部分則是論述責(zé)任追究的消極影響。通過分析州縣官員如實(shí)履行財(cái)政責(zé)任而給地方帶來負(fù)面的后果,主要體現(xiàn)在地方的財(cái)政危機(jī)、抗租抗糧斗爭、州縣官政務(wù)偏廢以及州縣人才不穩(wěn)定四個(gè)方面,表現(xiàn)了州縣官員財(cái)政責(zé)任的艱巨性,最終說明了州縣官這一角色的困境之處。
[Abstract]:National economy and people's livelihood, the first heavy financial Fu. And human land, is the root of wealth. At the same time, the income tax is the most important standard for the state and county officials. Therefore, the financial responsibility of state and county officials is of great significance to the people and the country. As for the study of the responsibility of prefectures and prefectures in Qing Dynasty, scholars often discussed the judicial responsibility of officials or the role of officials in levying taxes. On the other hand, the study on the financial responsibility of state and county officials appears to be weak, and the study involves many factors of economic history and social history, which limits the research of this subject. In view of this, this paper takes the fiscal responsibility of the state and county officials as the research object, with the help of the Qing Dynasty convention, rules of law, laws and other documents, through the specific financial responsibility of the state and county officials and their investigation and summary. It gives us a better understanding of the role of the state county magistrate and his dilemma over financial responsibility. This thesis is divided into five parts: the first part, introduction. This paper mainly introduces the reason and the research value, the academic history review, the research content and the basic data method, the important difficulty. The second part, the first chapter, the overview of financial management system in Qing Dynasty, mainly introduces the financial organizations at all levels and their functions in Qing Dynasty. This chapter is divided into three parts: the introduction of central institutions and functions, local financial officials and functions and grass-roots rural tax organizations. The third part, namely the second chapter-Qing Dynasty state county and its official financial responsibility. This chapter is divided into four parts: the first part reviews the duties of state and county officials; the second part mainly introduces the tax collection scope of Qing Dynasty; These two parts are one of the main contents of this paper. The fourth part, namely the third chapter-the state county official's financial responsibility investigation. The chapter is divided into three small parts. The first and second parts mainly introduce the main types and general procedures of investigating the financial responsibility of officials. On this basis, the third part introduces in detail the contents of the investigation of fiscal responsibility for state and county officials. This paper mainly discusses from four aspects of hukou farmland, urge, water transportation and salt lesson, which reflects the pressure of state and county officials from the tedious law and the mandatory of performing responsibility. This part is one of the emphases of this article. The fifth part is the fourth chapter-the financial responsibility of state and county officials and their investigation and analysis, which is the difficulty of this paper. The first part of the chapter from two angles, that is, to ensure national financial resources, punish corruption of officials, a brief description of the positive role of the system of accountability of officials. The second part discusses the negative impact of accountability. Through the analysis of the negative consequences that state and county officials have brought to the local government by truthfully fulfilling their financial responsibilities, they are mainly reflected in four aspects: the local financial crisis, the struggle against rent and grain, the partial scrapping of state and county government affairs, and the instability of state and county personnel. It shows the arduous nature of the fiscal responsibility of state and county officials, and finally explains the dilemma of the role of state and county officials.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K249

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孟姝芳;;清代雍正朝問責(zé)處分官員之重心初探[J];齊魯學(xué)刊;2014年06期

2 孟姝芳;;清代雍正朝官員問責(zé)與參劾制度研究[J];云南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年06期

3 李光偉;;清中后期地方虧空與錢糧蠲緩研究[J];安徽史學(xué);2014年06期

4 黃東海;;地方財(cái)政條件約束下的民事司法偏好——以清代州縣為中心[J];南京大學(xué)法律評論;2014年02期

5 薛剛;;清代文官考核中的問責(zé)制度[J];滿族研究;2014年03期

6 歲有生;;清代州縣的獨(dú)立財(cái)政與地方社會(huì)[J];中州學(xué)刊;2014年09期

7 孟姝芳;;清代雍正朝官員行政問責(zé)與處分類別[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會(huì)科學(xué)(漢文版);2014年05期

8 孟姝芳;;清代雍正朝官員行政問責(zé)與處分機(jī)構(gòu)之探究[J];中州學(xué)刊;2013年12期

9 劉鳳云;;嘉慶朝清理錢糧虧空中的艱難抉擇——兼論君臣在地方財(cái)政整飭中的不同認(rèn)識(shí)[J];中州學(xué)刊;2013年05期

10 劉偉;劉魁;;晚清州縣的辦公經(jīng)費(fèi)與公費(fèi)改革[J];安徽史學(xué);2013年03期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 許穎;清代文官行政處分程序研究[D];南開大學(xué);2010年

2 李鳳鳴;清代州縣官吏的司法責(zé)任[D];中國政法大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 冉睿;清代州縣錢谷責(zé)任追究制度研究[D];西南大學(xué);2015年

2 李鎮(zhèn)君;清末州縣財(cái)政實(shí)證分析[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2014年

3 茍曉敏;清朝官員懲處立法及其實(shí)踐研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2012年

4 張揚(yáng);清代行政處分制度初探[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

5 胡小平;清代官吏懲治施行研究[D];西南大學(xué);2011年

6 王磊;清代州縣官的財(cái)務(wù)收支[D];廈門大學(xué);2007年

7 楊森;清代州縣官的多重責(zé)任及其對地方司法之影響[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

8 匡小燁;清代存留制度與地方社會(huì)——以湖北為例[D];華中師范大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1855944