西漢宣元之際政治轉(zhuǎn)變研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-09 14:09
【摘要】：西漢宣元之際是漢朝發(fā)展史上由盛而衰的轉(zhuǎn)折時(shí)期。宣帝時(shí)“功光祖宗，業(yè)垂后嗣，可謂中興�！钡珡脑坶_始，“孝宣之業(yè)衰焉”，西漢開始衰落。這種由盛而衰的轉(zhuǎn)折，是和漢家在這一時(shí)期從“霸王道雜之”到純?nèi)逭蔚恼无D(zhuǎn)變密切相關(guān)的。本文以西漢宣元之際豪強(qiáng)和儒生的豪族化以及經(jīng)學(xué)統(tǒng)治地位的確立為主線，來(lái)揭示豪族是導(dǎo)致這一政治轉(zhuǎn)變的決定性力量。 第一章，圍繞著對(duì)西漢中后期的經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治和思想政策產(chǎn)生重大影響的鹽鐵會(huì)議展開論述。通過(guò)對(duì)武帝后期的社會(huì)危機(jī)、武帝時(shí)內(nèi)政的實(shí)質(zhì)、豪強(qiáng)在漢初及武帝時(shí)的曲折發(fā)展及其初步的豪族化及儒生在武帝時(shí)實(shí)際政治地位下降的討論，來(lái)說(shuō)明鹽鐵會(huì)議的實(shí)質(zhì)是：代表豪強(qiáng)利益的賢良文學(xué)向以桑弘羊?yàn)榇淼挠梅ㄅd利派爭(zhēng)奪政治權(quán)力、經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的斗爭(zhēng)。 第二章，論述在宣帝時(shí)期，隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力的增強(qiáng)，豪強(qiáng)地主迅速通過(guò)選舉制度向政權(quán)靠攏，納入皇權(quán)體系之內(nèi)。成為既有經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力，又有政治權(quán)力并通曉經(jīng)學(xué)的豪族。另一方面，經(jīng)學(xué)在宣帝朝日益受到統(tǒng)治階級(jí)的重視并滲透到政治生活的各個(gè)方面，更通過(guò)石渠閣經(jīng)學(xué)會(huì)議，實(shí)現(xiàn)了經(jīng)學(xué)與皇權(quán)結(jié)合，真正確立了經(jīng)學(xué)在政治思想中的統(tǒng)治地位。隨著儒家思想在政治上的統(tǒng)治地位逐漸確立，儒生政治崛起，儒生日益豪族化。隨著豪強(qiáng)和儒生的豪族化，最終在宣帝后期打破了用法興利派與豪族共享國(guó)家的政治權(quán)力和經(jīng)濟(jì)利益的局面，豪族獨(dú)居統(tǒng)治地位，為向純?nèi)逭蔚霓D(zhuǎn)變奠定了基礎(chǔ)。 第三章，論述宣元時(shí)期，隨著由豪強(qiáng)和儒生轉(zhuǎn)化而來(lái)的豪族日益官僚化、儒學(xué)化、世官化，豪族已構(gòu)成漢代政權(quán)的基礎(chǔ)，成為政治上的支配力量。無(wú)論是經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治和意識(shí)形態(tài)，都掌握在豪族手中。這不僅影響了宣元時(shí)期政權(quán)的構(gòu)成，，也使豪族的思想——儒學(xué)成為社會(huì)和政策的指導(dǎo)思想，由此，元帝時(shí)期的政治開始向純?nèi)逭无D(zhuǎn)變。豪族完全左右了王朝的內(nèi)外政策，國(guó)家的政策體現(xiàn)了豪族的利益。 余論部分：利用美國(guó)著名經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家曼庫(kù)爾·奧爾森的利益集團(tuán)理論解釋以豪族為代表的分利集團(tuán)與宣元之際政治轉(zhuǎn)變和西漢興衰的關(guān)系。再次論證了豪族是決定宣元之際政治轉(zhuǎn)變的決定性力量，也是導(dǎo)致西漢衰落的主要原因。
[Abstract]:The period of Xuan Yuan in the Western Han Dynasty was a turning point from prosperity to decline in the history of the Han Dynasty. When Emperor Xuandi, "Gong Guang ancestors, property down heirs, can be described as Zhongxing." But from the Yuan Emperor, "filial piety declaration of the cause of decline", the Western Han Dynasty began to decline. This transition from prosperity to decline is closely related to the political transformation of the Han family from overlord to pure Confucian politics in this period. This paper, based on the establishment of the dominant position of the Confucian and the powerful and the Confucian scholars in the Western Han Dynasty, reveals that the Haozu is the decisive force leading to this political transformation. The first chapter focuses on the salt and iron conference which had a great influence on the economy, politics and ideological policy in the middle and late Han Dynasty. Through the discussion of the social crisis in the later period of Emperor Wu, the essence of the internal affairs of Emperor Wu, the tortuous development of the great and strong in the beginning of Han Dynasty and the time of Wu Emperor, and the discussion of the initial nationalization and the decline of the actual political status of Confucianism in the time of Wu Emperor. To explain the essence of the Yantie Conference: the good literature representing the interests of the great and strong fought for political power and economic interests against the usages represented by Sang Hong-yang. The second chapter discusses that in the period of Xuandi, with the strengthening of economic strength, the powerful landlords quickly drew close to the regime through the electoral system and brought it into the imperial power system. Become both economic strength, political power and knowledge of the great clan. On the other hand, the Confucian classics was paid more and more attention by the ruling class in the Xuandi Dynasty and infiltrated into all aspects of political life. Through the Scholastic meeting of the Shiqu Pavilion, the combination of the Confucian classics and the imperial power was realized, and the dominant position of the Confucian classics in the political thought was really established. With the gradual establishment of Confucian ideology in political dominance, the rise of Confucian politics, Confucianism has become more and more aristocratic. With the popularity of the powerful and the Confucian, it broke the situation that the political power and economic interests of the country were shared between the usages of the Prosperity and the Haozi in the late period of Xuandi. The Haozi lived alone in the dominant position, which laid the foundation for the transformation to the pure Confucian politics. The third chapter discusses the Xuanyuan period, with the transformation from the powerful and the Confucian to the increasingly bureaucratic, Confucianism, the world official, the power of the Han Dynasty has formed the basis of the political dominance. Economic, political and ideological, it is in the hands of the aristocrats. This not only influenced the constitution of the regime in Xuan and Yuan dynasties, but also made Confucianism the guiding ideology of society and policy. Therefore, the politics of Yuan Dynasty began to change to pure Confucian politics. The grand people completely controlled the internal and external policies of the dynasty, and the national policies embodied the interests of the great people. The last part: using the interest group theory of Manqour Olson, a famous American economist, to explain the relationship between the distribution of interest group represented by the hau clan and the political change of Xuan Yuan period and the rise and fall of the Western Han Dynasty. Once again, it is demonstrated that the Haozu is the decisive force of the political transformation in the period of Xuanyuan Yuan, and the main cause of the decline of the Western Han Dynasty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：K234.1
本文編號(hào)：2174320
[Abstract]:The period of Xuan Yuan in the Western Han Dynasty was a turning point from prosperity to decline in the history of the Han Dynasty. When Emperor Xuandi, "Gong Guang ancestors, property down heirs, can be described as Zhongxing." But from the Yuan Emperor, "filial piety declaration of the cause of decline", the Western Han Dynasty began to decline. This transition from prosperity to decline is closely related to the political transformation of the Han family from overlord to pure Confucian politics in this period. This paper, based on the establishment of the dominant position of the Confucian and the powerful and the Confucian scholars in the Western Han Dynasty, reveals that the Haozu is the decisive force leading to this political transformation. The first chapter focuses on the salt and iron conference which had a great influence on the economy, politics and ideological policy in the middle and late Han Dynasty. Through the discussion of the social crisis in the later period of Emperor Wu, the essence of the internal affairs of Emperor Wu, the tortuous development of the great and strong in the beginning of Han Dynasty and the time of Wu Emperor, and the discussion of the initial nationalization and the decline of the actual political status of Confucianism in the time of Wu Emperor. To explain the essence of the Yantie Conference: the good literature representing the interests of the great and strong fought for political power and economic interests against the usages represented by Sang Hong-yang. The second chapter discusses that in the period of Xuandi, with the strengthening of economic strength, the powerful landlords quickly drew close to the regime through the electoral system and brought it into the imperial power system. Become both economic strength, political power and knowledge of the great clan. On the other hand, the Confucian classics was paid more and more attention by the ruling class in the Xuandi Dynasty and infiltrated into all aspects of political life. Through the Scholastic meeting of the Shiqu Pavilion, the combination of the Confucian classics and the imperial power was realized, and the dominant position of the Confucian classics in the political thought was really established. With the gradual establishment of Confucian ideology in political dominance, the rise of Confucian politics, Confucianism has become more and more aristocratic. With the popularity of the powerful and the Confucian, it broke the situation that the political power and economic interests of the country were shared between the usages of the Prosperity and the Haozi in the late period of Xuandi. The Haozi lived alone in the dominant position, which laid the foundation for the transformation to the pure Confucian politics. The third chapter discusses the Xuanyuan period, with the transformation from the powerful and the Confucian to the increasingly bureaucratic, Confucianism, the world official, the power of the Han Dynasty has formed the basis of the political dominance. Economic, political and ideological, it is in the hands of the aristocrats. This not only influenced the constitution of the regime in Xuan and Yuan dynasties, but also made Confucianism the guiding ideology of society and policy. Therefore, the politics of Yuan Dynasty began to change to pure Confucian politics. The grand people completely controlled the internal and external policies of the dynasty, and the national policies embodied the interests of the great people. The last part: using the interest group theory of Manqour Olson, a famous American economist, to explain the relationship between the distribution of interest group represented by the hau clan and the political change of Xuan Yuan period and the rise and fall of the Western Han Dynasty. Once again, it is demonstrated that the Haozu is the decisive force of the political transformation in the period of Xuanyuan Yuan, and the main cause of the decline of the Western Han Dynasty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：K234.1
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 蘇誠(chéng)擰;;漢元帝的儒生政治[J];安徽師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年03期
2 李沈陽(yáng);;西漢儒家知識(shí)分子對(duì)皇權(quán)的抗?fàn)嶽J];北方論叢;2007年03期
3 何茲全;秦漢地主與魏晉南北朝地主的不同[J];北京師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1984年02期
4 張濤;經(jīng)學(xué)與漢代的經(jīng)濟(jì)政策[J];北京社會(huì)科學(xué);1996年02期
5 唐元;張靜;;儒相匡衡與西漢宣元之際的儒法轉(zhuǎn)捩[J];河北旅游職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期
6 張烈;;論漢宣帝中興[J];長(zhǎng)沙水電師院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1990年01期
7 楊建宏;試論漢代經(jīng)學(xué)地主的形成軌跡及其成因[J];船山學(xué)刊;2000年02期
8 劉良群;從鹽鐵官營(yíng)看西漢的專賣制度及其流弊[J];贛南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1994年03期
9 成國(guó)雄;;論西漢昭宣時(shí)代為何多循吏[J];傳承;2008年04期
10 侯曉星;;略論西漢武昭宣時(shí)期的西域民族政策[J];廣西民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年S1期
本文編號(hào)：2174320
本文鏈接：http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2174320.html
教材專著
