近代中國思想界對“平等”的誤釋——以康有為《大同書》為例
發(fā)布時間:2018-12-14 23:07
【摘要】:近代平等觀念的傳播是中國近代思想史上最有意義的事情。近代價值觀念在中國社會得以落地生根的前提,是思想家在中國語境下加以解讀從而使之能夠為人們理解和接受。由于文化傳統(tǒng)與個人知識背景的影響,中國思想家在解讀近代平等觀念的過程中也發(fā)生了種種誤讀。康有為是近代中國較早接受平等觀念的思想家,其晚年所著《大同書》便集中體現(xiàn)了他對平等的理解?涤袨樗斫獾"平等"是無差別的平等,這種平等得以實現(xiàn)的前提是徹底消滅社會成員之間的差別。用中國傳統(tǒng)的平均主義觀念詮釋平等是康氏平等觀念的誤區(qū)之一。
[Abstract]:The spread of the concept of equality in modern times is the most significant thing in the history of modern Chinese thought. The premise for modern values to take root in Chinese society is for thinkers to interpret them in Chinese context so that they can be understood and accepted by people. Due to the influence of cultural tradition and personal knowledge background, Chinese thinkers also misread the concept of equality in modern times. Kang Youwei was a thinker who accepted the concept of equality earlier in modern China. His book Datong Book in his later years embodied his understanding of equality. Kang Youwei's understanding of "equality" is the equality without distinction, and the premise of the realization of equality is to eliminate the difference between the members of the society. Using the traditional equalitarianism to interpret equality is one of the misunderstandings of Kang's concept of equality.
【作者單位】: 南開大學(xué)周恩來政府管理學(xué)院;
【分類號】:D092;D081
[Abstract]:The spread of the concept of equality in modern times is the most significant thing in the history of modern Chinese thought. The premise for modern values to take root in Chinese society is for thinkers to interpret them in Chinese context so that they can be understood and accepted by people. Due to the influence of cultural tradition and personal knowledge background, Chinese thinkers also misread the concept of equality in modern times. Kang Youwei was a thinker who accepted the concept of equality earlier in modern China. His book Datong Book in his later years embodied his understanding of equality. Kang Youwei's understanding of "equality" is the equality without distinction, and the premise of the realization of equality is to eliminate the difference between the members of the society. Using the traditional equalitarianism to interpret equality is one of the misunderstandings of Kang's concept of equality.
【作者單位】: 南開大學(xué)周恩來政府管理學(xué)院;
【分類號】:D092;D081
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 呂祖蔭;《大同書》、親民、廁所[J];前線;2003年09期
2 陳正夫;評康有為《大同書》的人道主義思想[J];江西社會科學(xué);1984年01期
3 何金彝;傅立葉《新世界》與康有為《大同書》之比較[J];上海師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1996年01期
4 鄧?yán)?康有為《大同書》思想實質(zhì)論析[J];郴州師范高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2000年05期
5 汪軒宇;;康有為《大同書》理論價值及其思想局限[J];傳承;2013年06期
6 楊福田;傾篋底書 饗中外人——介紹江蘇古籍出版社出版的一批古籍文獻(xiàn)[J];w蕓,
本文編號:2379474
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2379474.html
最近更新
教材專著