發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-15 00:59

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 優(yōu)秀法官 司法改革 法官職業(yè)化　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：自2003年中國(guó)首屆“法官十杰”評(píng)選活動(dòng)舉辦以來(lái),全國(guó)各地通過(guò)各種評(píng)選和宣傳活動(dòng)一共產(chǎn)生了宋魚(yú)水、吳萍等數(shù)十位國(guó)家優(yōu)秀法官。在此之后,各個(gè)省市地方也組織了優(yōu)秀法官的評(píng)選活動(dòng)。顧名思義,優(yōu)秀法官是法院系統(tǒng)各個(gè)法官學(xué)習(xí)的楷模,其工作模式也是各級(jí)法官效仿和學(xué)習(xí)的典型。優(yōu)秀法官評(píng)選也構(gòu)成了全國(guó)上下各類(lèi)英模人物評(píng)選活動(dòng)的一部分。然而,對(duì)于優(yōu)秀法官評(píng)選目前學(xué)術(shù)界鮮有富有價(jià)值的學(xué)術(shù)探索,本文試圖尋求突破。 文章分為五部分。優(yōu)秀法官評(píng)選活動(dòng)分為評(píng)選和宣傳兩個(gè)階段,文章第一部分從社會(huì)變遷的角度回顧了優(yōu)秀法官評(píng)選宣傳的歷史與發(fā)展脈絡(luò)。分析了優(yōu)秀法官馬錫五和新時(shí)期的優(yōu)秀法官評(píng)選和宣傳的方式和渠道。 第二部分對(duì)優(yōu)秀法官評(píng)選活動(dòng)原因展開(kāi)文化、經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治和管理等多元分析。傳統(tǒng)儒家文化“德治”和“人皆可為堯舜”的因素為優(yōu)秀法官評(píng)選活動(dòng)提供了土壤；優(yōu)秀法官評(píng)選也是傳統(tǒng)中國(guó)官僚治理模式的延續(xù),優(yōu)秀法官身上所體現(xiàn)的意識(shí)形態(tài)構(gòu)成了新制度經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)意義上的非制度約束,具有經(jīng)濟(jì)功能；優(yōu)秀法官也是國(guó)家對(duì)官僚科層法官隊(duì)伍進(jìn)行管理,形成激勵(lì)機(jī)制的一種方式,其活動(dòng)也構(gòu)成了政法傳統(tǒng)下共產(chǎn)黨宣傳其思想方針的工具。 文章的第三部分是對(duì)20位全國(guó)優(yōu)秀法官為標(biāo)本展開(kāi)分析。分析優(yōu)秀法官的工作崗位分布、年齡、學(xué)歷、性別等,力圖勾勒出當(dāng)代中國(guó)優(yōu)秀法官的基本形象、工作模式和工作中的政治底色。針對(duì)民庭優(yōu)秀法官居多,刑庭、執(zhí)行庭和行政庭優(yōu)秀法官較少甚至缺位；法官隊(duì)伍年輕化和高學(xué)歷；女性法官居多；調(diào)節(jié)至上、服務(wù)大局和一心為民等司法模式,筆者給出了自己的看法。 第四部分則是對(duì)優(yōu)秀法官評(píng)選活動(dòng)進(jìn)行反思。優(yōu)秀法官工作模式存在著角色多元和角色沖突、過(guò)多地依賴(lài)人格完美和道德因素的缺陷。并且,優(yōu)秀法官評(píng)選活動(dòng)也沒(méi)有到達(dá)預(yù)期目的,這也說(shuō)明了缺乏制度配合下意識(shí)形態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì)功能的局限性,優(yōu)秀法官人格的完美凸顯了司法職業(yè)化制度的無(wú)力。 第五部分承接第四部分,在反思法官工作中的道德因素和政治因素之后,認(rèn)為法官隊(duì)伍建設(shè)與其依靠道德榜樣,不如依賴(lài)制度建構(gòu)和制度規(guī)范,當(dāng)務(wù)之急應(yīng)該推進(jìn)法官職業(yè)化建設(shè),正確處理好司法與執(zhí)政黨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的關(guān)系,總之,司法改革不應(yīng)該走回頭路。
[Abstract]:Since the first "Ten Justices" selection activities were held in China in 2003, dozens of outstanding state judges, including Song Yushui and Wu Ping, have been produced throughout the country through various selection and publicity activities. After that, Various provinces and cities have also organized the selection of outstanding judges. As the name implies, excellent judges are the role models for all judges in the court system. Its working mode is also a typical example for judges at all levels to emulate and learn. The selection of outstanding judges also forms a part of all kinds of English models in the country. However, there are few valuable academic explorations for the selection of outstanding judges in academic circles at present. This paper tries to find a breakthrough. The article is divided into five parts. The selection of outstanding judges is divided into two stages: selection and publicity. The first part of the article reviews the history and development of the selection and publicity of outstanding judges from the perspective of social changes, and analyzes the ways and channels of selecting and propagating outstanding judges in Ma Xiwu and the new period. In the second part, the author analyzes the reasons for the selection of outstanding judges in the aspects of culture, economy, politics and management. The traditional Confucian culture of "rule of virtue" and "people can serve as Yao and Shun" provide the soil for the selection of outstanding judges. The selection of excellent judges is also a continuation of the traditional Chinese bureaucratic governance mode. The ideology embodied by the excellent judges constitutes the non-institutional constraints in the sense of new institutional economics and has economic functions. Excellent judges are also a way for the state to manage the ranks of bureaucratic judges and form an incentive mechanism. Their activities also constitute a tool for the Communist Party to propagate its ideology and policy under the tradition of politics and law. The third part of the article is the analysis of 20 outstanding judges in China. It analyzes the job distribution, age, education and gender of the outstanding judges, and tries to outline the basic image of the outstanding judges in contemporary China. Working mode and political background in the work. Most of the outstanding judges in the civil court, the criminal court, the executive court and the administrative court are few or even absent; the ranks of judges are younger and more educated; the female judges are the majority; the adjustment is paramount; Serve the overall situation and serve the people and other judicial models, the author gives his own views. The 4th part is a reflection on the selection of outstanding judges. The work model of excellent judges has the defects of multiple roles and role conflicts, too much reliance on personality perfection and moral factors. The selection of outstanding judges has not reached the expected purpose, which also shows the lack of institutional coordination under the limitations of the economic function of ideology, the perfect personality of outstanding judges highlights the weakness of the judicial professionalization system. After reflecting on the moral and political factors in the work of judges, the author thinks that the construction of judges' contingent should rely on the system construction and system norm instead of relying on moral example. The urgent task is to promote the professionalization of judges and correctly handle the relationship between the judiciary and the leaders of the ruling party. In a word, the judicial reform should not go back.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 甘陽(yáng);;中國(guó)道路:三十年與六十年[J];讀書(shū);2007年06期

2 任鳴;加速中國(guó)法官職業(yè)化建設(shè)的進(jìn)程 最高法院首次明確提出法官職業(yè)化建設(shè)的具體目標(biāo)[J];法律適用(國(guó)家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2002年08期

3 侯猛;;中國(guó)的司法模式:傳統(tǒng)與改革[J];法商研究;2009年06期

4 張健;張吉;;封建社會(huì)道德模范宣傳的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析[J];石家莊經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年01期

5 李桂林;;司法能動(dòng)主義及其實(shí)行條件——基于美國(guó)司法能動(dòng)主義的考察[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

6 何永軍;;司法改革與政治合法性資源的流失[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

7 黃宗智;;集權(quán)的簡(jiǎn)約治理——中國(guó)以準(zhǔn)官員和糾紛解決為主的半正式基層行政[J];開(kāi)放時(shí)代;2008年02期

8 吳毅;吳帆;;傳統(tǒng)的翻轉(zhuǎn)與再翻轉(zhuǎn)——新區(qū)土改中農(nóng)民土地心態(tài)的建構(gòu)與歷史邏輯[J];開(kāi)放時(shí)代;2010年03期

9 孫笑俠;徐顯明;季衛(wèi)東;嚴(yán)存生;林來(lái)梵;李瑜青;龍宗智;徐昕;李其瑞;翁曉斌;郭星華;童之偉;劉作翔;張志銘;張騏;劉仁文;張谷;葛洪義;;轉(zhuǎn)型期法治縱論[J];中國(guó)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

10 喻中;;論中國(guó)最高人民法院實(shí)際承擔(dān)的政治功能——以最高人民法院歷年“工作報(bào)告”為素材[J];清華法學(xué);2006年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 本報(bào)記者　 　陳 冰;[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年

2 程相鵬邋孫中玉;[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

3 本報(bào)記者　尹艷紅;[N];中國(guó)婦女報(bào);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1512050