WTO爭端解決機制下的中美貿易摩擦研究
[Abstract]:Since the establishment of trade relations between China and the United States, trade exchanges between China and the United States have become increasingly close, in which inevitably there are frictions and contradictions, and the development path of Sino-US trade is very zigzag. Gradually, the United States has become the most frequent and fiercest country in trade friction with China. On the one hand, what we can see is the huge American market, the potential huge Chinese market and the increasingly close economic and trade exchanges; On the other hand, we should realize that the economic and trade policy of the United States is a combination of economic and political interests. In the face of this situation, I do not know what the future trend of Sino-US trade will be. First of all, by reviewing the specific events of Sino-US trade friction in recent years, this paper analyzes the new characteristics of Sino-US trade friction, such as the aggravation of politicization, the compound and normality of friction, and the linkage effect on the region and even the whole world. Secondly, the reason why the Sino-US trade friction is increasing is due to the state of Sino-US trade deficit, the serious trade protectionism of the United States and the defects of our economy. The second part of the article focuses on the necessity and obstacles of using WTO dispute settlement mechanism to resolve Sino-US trade disputes, expounds what is the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, and why developing countries should make use of this mechanism. And China's use of this mechanism to resolve Sino-US trade disputes obstacles. Finally, this paper discusses the methods and strategies of using WTO dispute settlement mechanism to solve trade frictions in China. The author thinks that the trade friction between China and the United States is the inevitable result of the collision between the two systems. We should treat it positively and take the initiative to find out its own reasons under the general environment. China should perfect the legal system suitable for the WTO rules. In the process of supporting the development of enterprises, we should pay attention to the optimization of the business environment of the enterprises rather than simply using funds to support them. In addition, China should establish a dynamic early-warning mechanism for US trade information and establish research and advisory bodies specifically for Sino-US trade disputes, and at the same time, China should be more proactive in prosecuting and responding to complaints. Take appropriate retaliatory action in order to defend your own interests. At the level of international law, the article puts forward that China should embody more initiative and give full play to the right of speech in the reform of WTO rules, and should actively participate in and promote the norms and reforms of the anti-dumping rules, countervailing rules and safeguard measures of WTO.
【學位授予單位】:中南民族大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2012
【分類號】:D996.1;F752
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 徐運良;;論協調WTO爭端解決機制與RTAs爭端解決機制管轄權沖突的原則[J];法學雜志;2009年03期
2 梁開銀;;論ICSID與WTO爭端解決機制的沖突及選擇——以國家和私人投資爭議解決為視角[J];法學雜志;2009年08期
3 吳建功;;WTO爭端解決機制中的不公正性:以發(fā)展中國家成員為視角[J];法學雜志;2010年01期
4 余敏友;;WTO爭端解決活動——中國表現及其改進建議[J];法學評論;2008年04期
5 張金龍;;WTO爭端解決機制與中國應對的思考[J];法制與社會;2011年11期
6 陳利強;屠新泉;;美國對華實施“雙軌制反補貼措施”問題研究[J];國際貿易問題;2010年02期
7 鄺艷湘;;經濟相互依賴與中美貿易摩擦:基于多階段博弈模型的研究[J];國際貿易問題;2010年11期
8 周駿宇;周文貴;;中美貿易摩擦:動態(tài)與理性透視[J];國際經貿探索;2007年12期
9 余利紅;劉海云;;我國報復威脅與美國對華反傾銷關系實證研究[J];國際經貿探索;2011年10期
10 茍大凱;;中國出口稅承諾對GATT1994一般例外條款的可援引性——基于《中國入世議定書》第11.3段通常含義的解釋[J];國際貿易;2011年08期
相關博士學位論文 前9條
1 高田甜;WTO爭端解決機制證明負擔規(guī)則研究[D];華東政法大學;2010年
2 蔡強;美國對華新貿易保護主義的負效應[D];吉林大學;2011年
3 何憲民;WTO體制下貿易救濟實施與中國的應對策略研究[D];天津財經大學;2011年
4 蔣奮;WTO《補貼與反補貼措施協定》中的“利益”問題研究[D];華東政法大學;2011年
5 傅瑜;論中美貿易關系[D];西南財經大學;2009年
6 孟祺;垂直專業(yè)化和中美貿易不平衡[D];南京農業(yè)大學;2009年
7 趙恩廣;論區(qū)域經濟一體化爭端解決機制在WTO框架下的并存及拓展[D];復旦大學;2010年
8 張波;中美貿易失衡問題研究[D];東北財經大學;2009年
9 鄒偉偉;中美經貿關系的歷史發(fā)展與政策博弈[D];西南財經大學;2010年
本文編號:2452622
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/falvlunwen/guojifa/2452622.html