發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-16 12:50

  本文選題：刑事速裁 + 權(quán)利保障��； 參考：《青島大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：“懲罰犯罪的刑罰越是迅速和及時(shí),就越是公正和有益。”公正與迅速的解決案件,也一直是我們刑事司法的不懈追求。而輕微刑事案件速裁程序在保障被追訴人的迅速審判權(quán)和提高訴訟效率的同時(shí),能夠有助于解決當(dāng)前我國犯罪高發(fā)狀態(tài)下高羈押率和超期羈押的“司法頑疾”。在國外,特別是美國、日本、德國等國家都已經(jīng)相繼建立起了具有本國特色的刑事速裁程序,在案件的分類、程序的啟動(dòng)、時(shí)效范圍、運(yùn)作方式等方面都已經(jīng)相對(duì)比較成熟,這無疑為我國速裁程序的構(gòu)建提供了借鑒參考。為期兩年的試點(diǎn)工作為速裁程序的建立積累了寶貴的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),但同時(shí)也暴露出了受案范圍過于狹窄、程序效率低下、當(dāng)事人訴訟權(quán)利保護(hù)不充分等一系列問題。因此,要構(gòu)建我國的刑事速裁程序就要在借鑒國外先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合我國自身的特點(diǎn)修正試點(diǎn)中出現(xiàn)的問題,注重速審權(quán)的保障性立法、明確速裁程序的受案范圍、設(shè)置合理的程序運(yùn)作機(jī)制,同時(shí)加強(qiáng)律師介入,在保證司法公正的前提下,加快刑事訴訟進(jìn)程。
[Abstract]:"the quicker and timely the punishment for a crime, the more just and beneficial it will be." Just and rapid resolution of cases, but also has been our criminal justice unremitting pursuit. However, the quick adjudication procedure of minor criminal cases can help to solve the "judicial malady" of high detention rate and extended detention under the condition of high incidence of crime in our country, while protecting the prosecution's right to adjudicate quickly and improving the efficiency of litigation. In foreign countries, especially in the United States, Japan, Germany and other countries, they have established criminal adjudication procedures with their own characteristics one after another. They have been relatively mature in the classification of cases, the initiation of procedures, the scope of limitation, the mode of operation, and so on. This undoubtedly provides the reference for the construction of the quick adjudication procedure in our country. The pilot work for two years has accumulated valuable practical experience for the establishment of the quick adjudication procedure, but at the same time, it also exposed a series of problems such as too narrow scope of accepting cases, inefficiency of procedure, inadequate protection of litigants' rights and so on. Therefore, in order to construct the criminal quick adjudication procedure in our country, we should draw lessons from the advanced experience of foreign countries, combine the characteristics of our country to correct the problems that appear in the pilot project, pay attention to the safeguard legislation of the speedy adjudication power, and make clear the scope of accepting the cases of the speedy adjudication procedure. Setting up reasonable procedure operation mechanism, strengthening lawyer's intervention, speeding up the process of criminal procedure under the premise of ensuring judicial justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青島大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高通;;刑事速裁程序證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)研究[J];法學(xué)論壇;2017年02期

2 洪浩;壽媛君;;我國刑事速裁程序邁向理性的嶄新課題[J];法學(xué)論壇;2017年02期

3 劉廣三;李艷霞;;我國刑事速裁程序試點(diǎn)的反思與重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué);2016年02期

4 汪建成;;以效率為價(jià)值導(dǎo)向的刑事速裁程序論綱[J];政法論壇;2016年01期

5 葉肖華;;簡上加簡:我國刑事速裁程序研究[J];浙江工商大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年01期

6 楊恪;;論刑事簡易程序案件中的辯護(hù)問題[J];理論界;2015年12期

7 廖大剛;白云飛;;刑事案件速裁程序試點(diǎn)運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀實(shí)證分析——以T市八家試點(diǎn)法院為研究樣本[J];法律適用;2015年12期

8 潘金貴;李冉毅;;規(guī)則與實(shí)效:刑事速裁程序運(yùn)行的初步檢視[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年06期

9 丁文生;;刑事速裁程序改革探析——基于刑期一年以下輕微刑事案的討論[J];廣西民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年05期

10 董照南;張愛曉;;刑事速裁試點(diǎn)中存在的問題及解決對(duì)策[J];中國審判;2015年17期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 周斌;;保障當(dāng)事人權(quán)益貫穿刑事速裁全程[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2015年

2 黃潔;;刑事速裁案件平均6天審結(jié)[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2015年

3 王春;;符合條件案件“走快車道”速審快判[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1896876