發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-19 03:39

  本文選題：非羈押訴訟 + 現(xiàn)狀��； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：非羈押訴訟制度體現(xiàn)了刑事訴訟保障人權(quán)和打擊犯罪的雙重需要,目前,國(guó)際上已確立了非羈押為常態(tài),羈押為例外的刑事訴訟原則。我國(guó)2012年新修改的《刑事訴訟法》新增了“尊重和保障人權(quán)”的立法宗旨,細(xì)化了逮捕條件,加強(qiáng)了羈押必要性審查,為廣泛適用非羈押訴訟提供了立法支持。但在司法實(shí)踐中,仍然存在非羈押性強(qiáng)制措施適用率低、執(zhí)行困難大、司法機(jī)關(guān)做法不統(tǒng)一等現(xiàn)象。因此,深入研究在我國(guó)推行非羈押訴訟制度,保障犯罪嫌疑人的各項(xiàng)權(quán)利仍有十分重要的意義�？v觀我國(guó)的非羈押訴訟制度,還處于初級(jí)階段,制約非羈押性強(qiáng)制措施適用的因素諸多:立法存在缺陷,“社會(huì)危險(xiǎn)性”的認(rèn)定缺乏可操作性;保障非羈押訴訟運(yùn)行的相關(guān)配套措施滯后;執(zhí)行主體積極性不高;受固有慣性思維的影響等。筆者嘗試在分析非羈押訴訟基礎(chǔ)理論的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)我國(guó)非羈押訴訟的現(xiàn)狀和問(wèn)題進(jìn)行研究,以國(guó)外相關(guān)制度為借鑒,以各地方的有益探索經(jīng)驗(yàn)為參考,特別針對(duì)取保候?qū)�、監(jiān)視居住措施適用中的頑疾,著重從基層檢察院的視角,探討如何改進(jìn)和完善我國(guó)非羈押訴訟制度。
[Abstract]:Non-custodial litigation system embodies the dual needs of protecting human rights in criminal proceedings and cracking down on crime. At present, the principle of non-custodial as the normal and detention as the exception has been established in the international community. The new revised Criminal procedure Law of China in 2012 has added the legislative purpose of "respecting and protecting human rights", refined the conditions of arrest, strengthened the examination of the necessity of custody, and provided legislative support for the wide application of non-custodial proceedings. However, in judicial practice, there are still some phenomena, such as low application rate of non-custodial coercive measures, great difficulties in implementation and inconsistent practice of judicial organs. Therefore, it is of great significance to carry out the non-custodial litigation system in our country and to protect the rights of criminal suspects. The system of non-custodial litigation in our country is still in the primary stage. There are many factors restricting the application of non-custodial coercive measures: the defects of legislation and the lack of maneuverability in the identification of "social danger"; The relative measures to guarantee the operation of non-custodial litigation lag behind; the enthusiasm of the subject of execution is not high; it is influenced by the inherent inertia thinking and so on. Based on the analysis of the basic theory of non-custodial litigation, the author attempts to study the current situation and problems of non-custodial litigation in China, taking the relevant foreign systems as reference, and taking the beneficial exploration experience of various places as reference, especially for the purpose of obtaining bail pending trial. From the perspective of the basic procuratorate, this paper probes into how to improve and perfect the non-custodial litigation system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張桂霞;;非羈押性強(qiáng)制措施中社會(huì)支持體系的構(gòu)建[J];山東警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

2 金志強(qiáng);王智;;非羈押性強(qiáng)制措施適用研究[J];法制博覽;2016年12期

3 郭冰;;羈押必要性審查制度實(shí)踐運(yùn)行審視[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2016年02期

4 陳子楠;;論我國(guó)審前羈押必要性審查的程序重構(gòu)[J];鐵道警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期

5 賈世民;吳江;周一;陳競(jìng)?cè)A;;犯罪嫌疑人未羈押狀態(tài)下的訴訟推進(jìn)[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年12期

6 李艷陽(yáng);楊愛(ài)霖;;我國(guó)非羈押訴訟存在的問(wèn)題及立法完善[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2014年06期

7 關(guān)振海;;捕后羈押必要性審查的基層實(shí)踐[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

8 高宛梅;;捕后輕刑判決率高的原因及對(duì)策[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2013年17期

9 房國(guó)賓;;保釋制度基礎(chǔ)比較研究[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年03期

10 周偉;邵爾希;;釋放還是羈押——擴(kuò)大適用取保候?qū)彽睦щy與選擇[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2007年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 樊崇義 ;張書(shū)銘;;細(xì)化逮捕條件,完善逮捕程序[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1908576