發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-19 09:11

  本文選題：重復(fù)起訴 + 訴訟系屬��； 參考：《新疆大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：囿于我國(guó)司法解釋相關(guān)規(guī)定之短缺,重復(fù)訴訟行為在司法實(shí)務(wù)中常有發(fā)生,往往是就某一案件尚未審結(jié),又發(fā)生對(duì)相同糾紛予以立案之狀況,從而激起對(duì)這種狀況是否是重復(fù)訴訟的探討。縱然《民事訴訟法司法解釋》對(duì)重復(fù)起訴問題做出了界定,為司法實(shí)踐提供了參考依據(jù),但所涉條文過(guò)于簡(jiǎn)單化,沒有與相關(guān)制度區(qū)別開來(lái),訴訟標(biāo)的和訴訟請(qǐng)求的關(guān)系沒有做出說(shuō)明、也未采用訴訟系屬概念等。加之訴訟標(biāo)的的同一是判斷重復(fù)起訴的核心標(biāo)準(zhǔn),但其本身也屬于理論界之難題,還尚未有定論,這也是認(rèn)定重復(fù)訴訟難點(diǎn)之原因。本文分為四個(gè)部分:在第一部分,重復(fù)起訴的概述。通過(guò)歷史分析法,考察重復(fù)起訴之緣起,探究其本質(zhì)內(nèi)涵。然后梳理與相關(guān)概念的關(guān)系,糾正理論與實(shí)務(wù)上對(duì)其認(rèn)知上的偏差,得出重復(fù)起訴僅具約束系屬中這一時(shí)間段的再次訴訟行為,判決后再訴由既判力制衡。在第二部分,重復(fù)起訴的識(shí)別標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。通過(guò)分析重復(fù)起訴之一般標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和特殊標(biāo)準(zhǔn),探討了我國(guó)解釋中重復(fù)起訴規(guī)定的不足之處。在第三部分,重復(fù)起訴規(guī)制域外之考察。透過(guò)比較評(píng)析域外相關(guān)的規(guī)定,考察先進(jìn)之處,希冀為下文合理借鑒做鋪陳。在第四部分,重復(fù)起訴規(guī)制的思考。首先,對(duì)我國(guó)與其相關(guān)理念及制度提出些完善建議。然后,對(duì)我國(guó)解釋之中所規(guī)定作出修正及補(bǔ)充,考慮到訴訟標(biāo)的之界定本就爭(zhēng)議不休,加之我國(guó)在其與訴訟請(qǐng)求的關(guān)系上適用含混,恐難將其同作為識(shí)別要件。而將當(dāng)事人同一、訴訟標(biāo)的同一、爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)共通作為辨識(shí)要件,合乎判斷案件是否一致的內(nèi)在要求。最后,在實(shí)務(wù)中為防范對(duì)后訴案件重復(fù)審理,主張?jiān)O(shè)立爭(zhēng)點(diǎn)整理程序和試行強(qiáng)制反訴制度。
[Abstract]:Due to the shortage of the relevant provisions of judicial interpretation in our country, repeated actions often occur in judicial practice, often in the situation that a case has not yet been completed and the same dispute is filed. Thus arousing the discussion of whether this situation is a duplicate lawsuit. Although the Judicial interpretation of the Civil procedure Law defines the issue of repeated prosecution and provides a reference basis for judicial practice, the provisions in question are too simplistic and do not distinguish them from the relevant systems. The relationship between the object of the lawsuit and the claim is not explained, and the concept of litigation is not adopted. In addition, the same object of litigation is the core standard of judging repeated prosecution, but it is also a difficult problem in the theoretical circle, which has not yet been concluded, which is also the reason for the difficulty of identifying repeated litigation. This article is divided into four parts: in the first part, the summary of repeated prosecution. By means of historical analysis, the origin of repeated prosecution is investigated and its essential connotation is explored. Then combing the relationship with related concepts, correcting the cognitive bias between theory and practice, it is concluded that repeated prosecution is only restricted in this period of time of relitigation behavior, after judgment by ex judicata checks and balances. In the second part, the identification criteria of repeated prosecution. By analyzing the general standards and special standards of repeated prosecution, this paper probes into the deficiencies of the provisions of repeated prosecution in our interpretation. In the third part, the investigation of repeated prosecution is carried out. Through comparative analysis of the relevant provisions of foreign countries, we hope to lay the groundwork for the following reasonable reference. In the fourth part, the reflection on the regulation of repeated prosecution. First of all, put forward some perfect suggestions to our country and its related idea and system. Then, the provisions of our interpretation are amended and supplemented, considering that the definition of the object of the lawsuit is controversial, and that the relationship between the litigation and the request is ambiguous, it is difficult to identify the object with it. Taking the same litigant, the same subject of the lawsuit and the common point as the identification elements is in line with the inherent requirement of judging whether the case is consistent or not. Finally, in order to prevent the repeated trial of the post-suit cases, the author advocates to set up the dispute arrangement procedure and try out the compulsory counterclaim system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：新疆大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 段厚省;;共同訴訟形態(tài)研究——以訴訟標(biāo)的理論為方法[J];訴訟法論叢;2006年00期

2 Q�醇t，

本文編號(hào)：1909523