發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-22 01:38

  本文選題：業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià) + 因子分析��； 參考：《重慶交通大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)作為企業(yè)管理的難點(diǎn)之一,向來(lái)是管理科學(xué)領(lǐng)域研究的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。建立一套科學(xué)合理并且行之有效的企業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)體系,能夠?qū)ζ髽I(yè)的經(jīng)營(yíng)行為起到正確的引導(dǎo)作用,幫助企業(yè)的經(jīng)營(yíng)管理者尋找企業(yè)的優(yōu)勢(shì)和差距,從而使企業(yè)保持優(yōu)勢(shì)、縮短差距以提升自身的核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力,實(shí)現(xiàn)企業(yè)發(fā)展的戰(zhàn)略性目標(biāo)。 隨著我國(guó)社會(huì)主義市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)體制的實(shí)現(xiàn),在經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展的過(guò)程中,房地產(chǎn)行業(yè)的迅猛發(fā)展為我國(guó)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)建設(shè)添磚加瓦。2008年的金融危機(jī)使我國(guó)市場(chǎng)環(huán)境變化深刻,政府對(duì)于房地產(chǎn)市場(chǎng)的大力調(diào)控使得房地產(chǎn)業(yè)做出了重要的發(fā)展變革,在這樣的背景下,評(píng)價(jià)我國(guó)房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)的業(yè)績(jī)水平具有非常重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,同時(shí)也對(duì)整個(gè)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展起到了重要的作用。 本文首先對(duì)企業(yè)業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)的相關(guān)理論進(jìn)行了梳理,同時(shí)對(duì)本文所使用的因子分析和EVA這兩種業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)方法進(jìn)行了理論探討。在此基礎(chǔ)上,利用深滬兩市30家房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)2012年的財(cái)務(wù)數(shù)據(jù)作為樣本對(duì)其進(jìn)行業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)的實(shí)證研究。從盈利能力、營(yíng)運(yùn)能力、償債能力、發(fā)展能力四個(gè)角度篩選符合房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)特點(diǎn)的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo),作為因子分析的原始變量指標(biāo),文章共得到五個(gè)公共因子。然后運(yùn)用EVA的業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)方法,選擇計(jì)算的調(diào)整項(xiàng)目,根據(jù)公式計(jì)算出各樣本企業(yè)EVA的值,由于考慮到規(guī)模效應(yīng),用EPA (EVA/投入資本總額)對(duì)30家房地產(chǎn)企業(yè)進(jìn)行業(yè)績(jī)情況的排名。得到這兩種方法的評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果后,運(yùn)用綜合序數(shù)法判斷二者的相關(guān)度,然后選擇適當(dāng)?shù)臋?quán)重比例對(duì)兩種業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)的結(jié)果進(jìn)行綜合,得到排名結(jié)果。 使用因子分析和EVA相結(jié)合的業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)方法不僅可以較為全面的反映出企業(yè)的財(cái)務(wù)信息,而且由于考慮了企業(yè)的資本成本,使得評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果能夠更為真實(shí)地反映出企業(yè)為股東創(chuàng)造出的財(cái)富。
[Abstract]:As one of the difficulties in enterprise management, enterprise performance evaluation has always been a hot issue in the field of management science. The establishment of a set of scientific, reasonable and effective evaluation system of business performance can guide the management behavior of enterprises correctly, help the managers of enterprises to find the advantages and gaps of enterprises, so that the enterprises can maintain their advantages. Shorten the gap to enhance their core competitiveness and achieve the strategic goal of enterprise development. With the realization of socialist market economy system in China, the rapid development of real estate industry contributes to the construction of our national economy in the process of rapid economic development. The government has made great efforts to adjust and control the real estate market. Under this background, it is of great practical significance to evaluate the performance level of Chinese real estate enterprises. At the same time, the development of the entire national economy has played an important role. This paper firstly combs the relevant theories of enterprise performance evaluation, and probes into the two methods of performance evaluation, which are factor analysis and EVA, which are used in this paper. On this basis, the financial data of 30 real estate companies in Shenzhen and Shanghai stock markets in 2012 are used as samples to evaluate their performance. From the four angles of profitability, operation ability, solvency and development ability, the evaluation indexes which accord with the characteristics of real estate enterprises are selected. As the original variable indexes of factor analysis, five public factors are obtained in this paper. Then, by using the performance evaluation method of EVA, the adjusted items are selected, and the value of EVA of each sample enterprise is calculated according to the formula. Considering the effect of scale, the performance of 30 real estate enterprises is ranked by EPA / total investment capital. After the evaluation results of the two methods are obtained, the correlation degree of the two methods is judged by the method of comprehensive ordinal number, and then the results of the two kinds of performance evaluation are synthesized with appropriate weight ratio, and the ranking results are obtained. The performance evaluation method combining factor analysis and EVA can not only reflect the financial information of the enterprise, but also consider the capital cost of the enterprise. So that the evaluation results can more truly reflect the wealth created by enterprises for shareholders.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F299.233.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周長(zhǎng)青;EVA業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)評(píng)述[J];財(cái)會(huì)通訊;2001年08期

2 李秉成;黃厚建;余珍;;我國(guó)集團(tuán)公司內(nèi)部業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)方法演進(jìn)——基于武漢鋼鐵(集團(tuán))公司案例研究[J];財(cái)政監(jiān)督;2007年08期

3 王慶芳,周子劍;EVA:價(jià)值評(píng)估與業(yè)績(jī)?cè)u(píng)價(jià)的理論探討[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2001年10期

4 曹元坤,占小軍;激勵(lì)理論研究現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2003年12期

5 郭家虎,崔文娟;EVA對(duì)企業(yè)價(jià)值的解釋度:比較研究[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2004年05期

6 王國(guó)順,彭宏;EVA方法有效性的實(shí)證研究[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2004年01期

7 陳建國(guó);譚穎賢;;基于因子分析方法的房地產(chǎn)業(yè)財(cái)務(wù)分析[J];南方金融;2008年05期

8 趙云陽(yáng),李元;經(jīng)濟(jì)增加值(EVA)指標(biāo)在我國(guó)股市的實(shí)證研究[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2004年01期

9 倪義芳;吳曉波;;論企業(yè)戰(zhàn)略管理思想的演變[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2001年06期

10 王喜剛,叢海濤,歐陽(yáng)令南;什么解釋公司價(jià)值:EVA還是會(huì)計(jì)指標(biāo)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)科學(xué);2003年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1785054