發(fā)布時間：2018-04-22 07:40

  本文選題：城市化 + 農(nóng)村征地��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：近幾年來，隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速增長，加快城市化建設(shè)成為我國面臨的重要課題，在此背景下房屋征收項目不斷增多、力度不斷加大。在房屋征收過程中，各級政府雖然基本做到了依法行政，維護(hù)被征收群眾的合法權(quán)益，確保房屋征收大局的基本穩(wěn)定，但由于房屋征收涉及群眾利益的方方面面，工作難免有不到位、不規(guī)范的地方，也引發(fā)了不少信訪問題。房屋征收中的信訪問題，已成為當(dāng)前影響社會穩(wěn)定的熱點、難點問題之一�，F(xiàn)有的《國有土地上房屋征收與補(bǔ)償條例》雖然對政府主導(dǎo)征收的行為從法律上進(jìn)行了確認(rèn)和規(guī)范，但在具體實踐中我們?nèi)匀豢梢园l(fā)現(xiàn)有的地方政府采取威脅手段強(qiáng)迫被征收人簽訂不平等條約,有的不經(jīng)過法定程序即用行政手段實施強(qiáng)行征收。一些地方的征收管理部門與征收單位、房地產(chǎn)評估機(jī)構(gòu)和房屋測繪單位政企不分,造成房屋征收市場不公平、不透明,以至形成部門壟斷。一些地方政府部門授意或暗示房地產(chǎn)評估機(jī)構(gòu),在實施房地產(chǎn)評估活動中有意壓低評估價格,使被征收人的利益受到損害,甚至脅迫評估機(jī)構(gòu)按授意評估,致使評估市場一些評估項目的價格扭曲,有失合理公正原則。這些問題使房屋征收信訪,尤其是集體信訪呈逐年上升趨勢。這已經(jīng)影響到百姓對政府的信任度,影響到政府在百姓心中的形象。 信訪制度作為我國獨特的一項監(jiān)督制度，在上達(dá)民意，解決糾紛方面一直起到了重要的作用。在我國司法制度建設(shè)還不成熟的背景下，征收問題往往通過信訪途徑來解決。但是由于信訪制度自身也有其局限和缺陷，，導(dǎo)致被征收人在上訪過程中又出現(xiàn)新的矛盾�；鶎诱�府為了“維穩(wěn)”，往往對信訪戶進(jìn)行強(qiáng)制手段，嚴(yán)重侵害了信訪人的人身權(quán)力。故此，探討信訪制度在城市農(nóng)村房屋征收和征地工作中如何發(fā)揮自己的作用，且完善該作用就是成為本文的重點。本文先著力分別分析了基層政府在城市和農(nóng)村地區(qū)征收中的信訪工作的不足，并且認(rèn)真提煉了被征收人在上訪過程中到底有哪些訴求。通過分析城市和農(nóng)村地區(qū)在解決征收工作中的信訪工作的不足和被征收人的訴求，來尋找目前我國城市農(nóng)村房屋征收工作中的癥結(jié)所在，進(jìn)而提出了本人在解決這些問題的建議和對策。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid growth of economy, speeding up the construction of urbanization has become an important subject in China. In the process of housing collection, although governments at all levels have basically managed according to law, safeguarded the legitimate rights and interests of the people who have been expropriated, and ensured the basic stability of the overall situation of housing expropriation, because housing collection involves all aspects of the interests of the masses, Work unavoidably not in place, not standardized places, but also caused a lot of letters and visits. The issue of letters and visits in house collection has become one of the hot and difficult problems affecting social stability. The existing regulations on the Collection and compensation of Housing on State-owned Land although the acts of government-led expropriation have been legally recognized and standardized, However, in practice, we can still find that some local governments use threatening means to force the expropriated person to sign unequal treaties, and some use administrative means to impose expropriation without legal procedure. In some places, the collection management departments are not separated from the collection units, the real estate evaluation agencies and the housing surveying and mapping units, resulting in the unfair and opaque housing collection market, and even the formation of a departmental monopoly. Some local government departments have instructed or implied that real estate appraisal agencies deliberately lower the assessment price in the implementation of real estate evaluation activities, thereby harming the interests of the expropriated persons, and even coercing the evaluation agencies to assess them according to instructions. The price of some evaluation items in the evaluation market is distorted, which is not reasonable and fair. These problems make house collection letters, especially collective letters and visits are rising year by year. This has affected the people's trust in the government, affect the image of the government in the people's hearts. As a unique supervision system in China, the petition system has played an important role in reaching public opinion and resolving disputes. Under the background of immature construction of judicial system in our country, the problem of expropriation is often solved by means of letters and visits. However, the system of petition itself has its limitations and defects, which leads to new contradictions in the process of petition. In order to maintain stability, grassroots governments often impose coercive measures on petitioners, which seriously infringe upon the personal rights of petitioners. Therefore, it is the focus of this paper to probe into how the petition system can play its role in the collection and land requisition of urban and rural houses. This paper analyzes the deficiency of the petition work of the grass-roots government in the urban and rural areas, and abstracts the appeal of the expropriated person in the process of petition. Through the analysis of the deficiency of the petition work and the demands of the expropriated people in the urban and rural areas, to find out the crux of the current urban and rural housing collection work in our country. Then I put forward my suggestions and countermeasures to solve these problems.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D632.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 王成國;城市房屋拆遷補(bǔ)償問題研究[J];北京房地產(chǎn);2002年12期

2 王學(xué)軍;中國信訪體制的功能、問題和改革思路[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2003年01期

3 楊亦喬;拆遷安置過程中產(chǎn)權(quán)關(guān)系處置比較[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2000年03期

4 王亦白;宋檀;;解決土地信訪問題的幾點思考[J];中國房地產(chǎn);2006年06期

5 杜澤芳,王立生;論舊城改造拆遷安置[J];遼寧建材;2000年04期

本文編號：1786280