商品房質(zhì)量責(zé)任的若干問題研究
[Abstract]:The existence of quality problems in commercial housing is a common phenomenon in judicial practice, and it is also one of the main reasons for the disputes between buyers and real estate developers. The quality responsibility of commercial housing refers to the responsibility of the developer for the quality of the commercial house purchased by the buyer during the warranty period. The characteristics of the quality responsibility of commercial housing include the legal and contractual obligations of the developer, the purpose of recovering the loss of the buyer and the mandatory norm. The quality problems in judicial practice include that the subject does not conform to the conditions of delivery, that the normal use is seriously affected after delivery and that the general quality is affected. Therefore, identification plays an important role in distinguishing the category of quality problems. However, the selection of identification agencies, the submission of identification materials and the bearing of identification fees are the most controversial areas between the two parties. If the main body of a commercial house does not meet the conditions for delivery and use, the buyer may cancel the contract directly, and if the commercial house seriously affects the normal use of the house, the buyer may request cancellation of the contract or request compensation for loss or repair of the building, For general quality problems, the buyer can only claim damages or repair the house. In reality, many developers in the sale of commercial housing, the way to cancel the company's qualifications to avoid legal responsibility. In this case, the buyer may, according to his own circumstances, require different subjects to bear the corresponding legal liability, the developer shall bear the responsibility of the liquidation organization in the liquidation process, and the shareholders shall bear the responsibility for the developer who has liquidated and cancelled, The unit that the developer amalgamates or separates should undertake responsibility by the unit after amalgamation or division, if developer entrusts other unit to perform warranty obligation, ought to undertake responsibility by fiduciary unit, or by the construction unit of commodity house, underwriting Orgnaization undertakes responsibility.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2013
【分類號】:D923;D922.29
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 符振彥;;建筑質(zhì)量強制險工程質(zhì)量“保險”當(dāng)先[J];北京房地產(chǎn);2006年11期
2 鄒明理;對《關(guān)于司法鑒定管理問題的決定》中幾個有爭議問題的思考[J];中國司法;2005年08期
3 李巧毅;;論公司注銷后股東對債權(quán)人的民事責(zé)任[J];廣東工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年02期
4 宿遲;黃海濤;;從程序保障看我國司法鑒定制度改革[J];法律適用;2008年12期
5 劉軍;;淺談營業(yè)執(zhí)照被吊銷后的股東責(zé)任[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬);2012年04期
6 索好麗;;商品房質(zhì)量糾紛解決機制的完善[J];河北理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2006年03期
7 王惠兵;;淺析商品房買賣合同中的房屋質(zhì)量糾紛[J];市場周刊.理論研究;2006年02期
8 周建斌;;公司注銷后遺漏債務(wù)的處理——江蘇四達工業(yè)科技有限公司訴黃某、陳某買賣合同糾紛案解析[J];市場周刊(理論研究);2012年03期
9 李鑫;常林;;論民事訴訟鑒定機構(gòu)遴選機制的完善[J];中國司法鑒定;2011年01期
10 陳平;;司法鑒定機構(gòu)中存在問題及對策——與楊圣軍商榷[J];中國司法鑒定;2012年01期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條
1 本報記者 方帥;[N];中國房地產(chǎn)報;2010年
2 廖移海;[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟報;2001年
3 程宇翔;[N];駐馬店日報;2006年
,本文編號:2264337
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/jingjilunwen/fangdichanjingjilunwen/2264337.html