發(fā)布時間：2018-04-02 20:21

  本文選題：金融企業(yè)　切入點：高管薪酬　出處：《貴州財經(jīng)大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：過去的十多年里經(jīng)濟學家們對高管薪酬的關注逐漸增多，但這些經(jīng)濟學家的研究大部分來自于像美國和英國這樣的發(fā)達國家，而且發(fā)達國家數(shù)據(jù)的可用性是關注高管薪酬的另一個重要原因。考慮到公司治理會在經(jīng)濟發(fā)展中發(fā)揮重要的作用，所以關于高管薪酬方面的研究在不斷地增加。然而，既然高管薪酬在發(fā)達國家的研究如此重要，那么對于發(fā)展中國家的企業(yè)來說，關注高管薪酬也同樣是不可或缺的。特別是，對于轉型經(jīng)濟體，通過各種改革措施，努力把他們的國有企業(yè)轉變成為有利可圖的現(xiàn)代化企業(yè)，有效的管理者激勵條款是經(jīng)濟成功轉型的關鍵因素。由于高管績效薪酬代表著最高管理層的激勵體系，仔細研究現(xiàn)代化企業(yè)的業(yè)績是否對高管薪酬有一定的影響是有意義的，它為當前的努力改革和未來的改革措施的設計評價提供了必要的信息。 國外學者關于企業(yè)業(yè)績對高管薪酬是否有一定影響的研究很早就開始了，研究的比較透徹，也明顯領先于我國學者的研究。但是考慮到我國的基本國情，許多國外的研究并不一定同樣適用于我國，所以我們應該在國外研究的基礎上，取其精華，，去其糟粕，結合我國的具體國情進行研究。所以，本文在國內(nèi)外學者研究的基礎上，具體結合中國上市金融企業(yè)高管薪酬、股權結構與企業(yè)業(yè)績之間的關系做了研究。 本文采用文獻與實證相結合的研究方法進行研究，檢驗了從2001年到2012年之間中國金融企業(yè)高管薪酬、股權結構與企業(yè)業(yè)績之間的關系。研究結論表明，中國金融行業(yè)首席執(zhí)行官薪酬已經(jīng)在過去的十年中顯著增加，而且金融和非金融企業(yè)之間的管理層薪酬的相對差異也顯著增加。中國金融業(yè)高管薪酬是基于政治關系的，而不是一個以市場為基礎的契約。與發(fā)達國家的以機構為基礎的理論和以前的研究結果相反，很少有證據(jù)支持首席執(zhí)行官薪酬與公司的股票收益率（RET）或資產(chǎn)回報率（ROA）的指標呈正相關關系。目前中國的高管薪酬在設定績效工資方面只有很少的證據(jù)支持點。當公司規(guī)模在高管薪酬中有顯著的正面影響時，股權集中度有顯著的負面影響。此外，薪酬委員會很友好地提高高管薪酬，但是國家所有權的參與往往會限制高管薪酬。結果表明，當公司治理薄弱時，政府或者監(jiān)管可以在業(yè)務活動領域確保有效的公司治理。研究結果對管理者和董事會成員對薪酬管理和激勵水平測量有著重要的意義，而且在金融業(yè)的風險控制中也有著重要的意義。
[Abstract]:Over the past decade or so, economists have been paying more and more attention to executive compensation, but most of their research has come from developed countries like the United States and the United Kingdom.And the availability of data in developed countries is another important reason to focus on executive compensation.Considering that corporate governance plays an important role in economic development, the research on executive compensation is increasing.However, given the importance of executive pay research in developed countries, it is also essential for companies in developing countries to focus on executive pay.In particular, for transition economies, through various reform measures, efforts to transform their state-owned enterprises into profitable modern enterprises, effective management incentives are key factors for successful economic transformation.Since executive performance pay represents the incentive system of top management, it is meaningful to carefully study whether the performance of modern enterprises has a certain impact on executive compensation.It provides the necessary information for the current reform and the design evaluation of the future reform measures.Foreign scholars on whether corporate performance has a certain impact on executive compensation has started a long time ago, the research is more thorough, but also obviously ahead of the study of Chinese scholars.However, considering the basic situation of our country, many foreign studies are not necessarily applicable to our country, so we should take the essence of the study, discard the dross, and combine with the specific conditions of our country.Therefore, based on the research of scholars at home and abroad, this paper makes a study on the relationship between executive compensation, equity structure and corporate performance of listed financial enterprises in China.This paper examines the relationship between executive compensation, equity structure and corporate performance of Chinese financial enterprises from 2001 to 2012 by using the method of combining literature and empirical research.The findings show that the compensation of chief executives in China's financial sector has increased significantly over the past decade, and the relative differences in executive compensation between financial and non-financial companies have also increased significantly.Executive compensation in China's financial sector is based on political relations, not a market-based contract.Contrary to the institution-based theory in developed countries and previous research results, there is little evidence to support a positive correlation between CEO compensation and the indicators of the firm's return on equity or return on assets.At present, executive compensation in China has little evidence to support performance pay.When firm size has a significant positive impact on executive compensation, equity concentration has a significant negative impact.In addition, compensation committees are friendly in raising executive pay, but state-owned participation tends to limit executive pay.The results show that when corporate governance is weak, government or regulation can ensure effective corporate governance in the field of business activities.The results are of great significance to managers and board members in the measurement of salary management and incentive level, as well as in the risk control of the financial industry.
【學位授予單位】：貴州財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F272.92;F832.3;F830.42

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 宋增基;盧溢洪;楊柳;;銀行高管薪酬與績效關系的實證研究[J];重慶大學學報(社會科學版);2009年04期

2 肖繼輝;有關經(jīng)理報酬決定因素的實證研究[J];當代財經(jīng);2005年05期

3 盧銳;;管理層權力、薪酬與業(yè)績敏感性分析——來自中國上市公司的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];當代財經(jīng);2008年07期

4 徐向藝;王俊椺;鞏震;;高管人員報酬激勵與公司治理績效研究——一項基于深、滬A股上市公司的實證分析[J];中國工業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2007年02期

5 羅大偉,萬迪f ;關于管理者薪酬的研究綜述[J];管理工程學報;2002年04期

6 朱其俊;彭蔚蔚;;我國上市公司高管人員薪酬與業(yè)績相關性的研究[J];華東經(jīng)濟管理;2008年08期

7 王培欣;田英辰;李銳;;上市公司高管人員薪酬問題實證分析[J];管理科學;2006年03期

8 魯海帆;;高管團隊內(nèi)薪酬差距、合作需求與多元化戰(zhàn)略[J];管理科學;2007年04期

9 魏剛;高級管理層激勵與上市公司經(jīng)營績效[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2000年03期

10 權小鋒;吳世農(nóng);文芳;;管理層權力、私有收益與薪酬操縱[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2010年11期

本文編號：1701955