發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-17 07:21

  本文選題：馬克思 + 國(guó)家　； 參考：《天津商業(yè)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文借鑒當(dāng)代關(guān)于國(guó)家與社會(huì)研究的視角，采用文獻(xiàn)分析法，對(duì)馬克思的國(guó)家與社會(huì)關(guān)系理論進(jìn)行研究。馬克思站在唯物主義歷史觀的立場(chǎng)上，對(duì)黑格爾唯心史觀的國(guó)家與社會(huì)關(guān)系理論進(jìn)行了批判。通過(guò)哲學(xué)與經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的研究，形成自己的國(guó)家與社會(huì)關(guān)系理論。馬克思的對(duì)國(guó)家與社會(huì)關(guān)系的闡述可以分為一般關(guān)系的闡述和不同歷史時(shí)期國(guó)家與社會(huì)之間關(guān)系的闡述。就國(guó)家與社會(huì)一般關(guān)系而言，馬克思認(rèn)為國(guó)家是從社會(huì)中產(chǎn)生，是社會(huì)發(fā)展到一定階段的產(chǎn)物，是人類社會(huì)組織的一種特殊形式，即是私有制出現(xiàn)以后，從社會(huì)分化出來(lái)的管理機(jī)構(gòu)。相對(duì)于社會(huì)，國(guó)家有著一定的獨(dú)立性和自主性，但隨著生產(chǎn)力的高度發(fā)展和私有制的消滅，國(guó)家最終將會(huì)消亡，回歸社會(huì)。就不同歷史時(shí)期國(guó)家與社會(huì)關(guān)系而言，前資本主義社會(huì)時(shí)期的國(guó)家與社會(huì)處于高度重合的狀態(tài)，資本主義社會(huì)的國(guó)家與社會(huì)呈現(xiàn)一種對(duì)立狀態(tài)。在未來(lái)社會(huì)，因?yàn)樯�產(chǎn)力的高度發(fā)展，，社會(huì)自治組織會(huì)逐漸擴(kuò)大，國(guó)家的政治職能將會(huì)消失，作為社會(huì)管理機(jī)構(gòu)的國(guó)家將重新回歸于社會(huì)，完成國(guó)家與社會(huì)的統(tǒng)一。通過(guò)對(duì)馬克思國(guó)家與社會(huì)關(guān)系理論的研究分析，本文認(rèn)為，當(dāng)前我國(guó)社會(huì)現(xiàn)代化的進(jìn)程需要國(guó)家發(fā)揮指引和導(dǎo)向作用，以培養(yǎng)一個(gè)良好的市民社會(huì)環(huán)境，推動(dòng)社會(huì)向前發(fā)展。在中國(guó)的現(xiàn)代化進(jìn)程中，在處理國(guó)家與社會(huì)之間的關(guān)系上應(yīng)始終遵循著社會(huì)決定國(guó)家，國(guó)家擁有相對(duì)自主性這個(gè)基本原理，并以此來(lái)制定相應(yīng)的政策，既要加強(qiáng)國(guó)家的自主性又要加強(qiáng)社會(huì)的自主性，達(dá)到二者力量的均衡，形成國(guó)家與社會(huì)之間的良好互動(dòng)。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of contemporary research on state and society, this paper uses literature analysis to study Marx's theory of state and social relations. From the standpoint of historical materialism, Marx criticized Hegel's theory of state and social relations. Through the research of philosophy and economics, we can form our own theory of state and social relations. Marx's elaboration of state and social relations can be divided into general relations and different historical periods of the relationship between the state and society. As far as the general relationship between the state and society is concerned, Marx believed that the state was produced from society, was the product of social development to a certain stage, and was a special form of human social organization, that is, after the emergence of private ownership. A management body separated from society. Compared with the society, the country has certain independence and autonomy, but with the high development of productive forces and the elimination of private ownership, the country will eventually die out and return to society. In terms of the relationship between the state and the society in different historical periods, the state and society of the pre-capitalist society are in a highly overlapping state, and the state and the society of the capitalist society are in a state of opposition. In the future society, because of the high development of productive forces, the social autonomous organization will expand gradually, the political function of the country will disappear, the country as the social management organization will return to the society again, completes the unification of the country and the society. Through the research and analysis of Marx's theory of state and social relations, this paper holds that the process of social modernization in our country needs the guidance and guidance of the state, in order to cultivate a good civil society environment and promote the development of society. In the course of China's modernization, the basic principle that society decides the state and the state has relative autonomy should always be followed in handling the relations between the state and society, and the corresponding policies should be formulated accordingly. It is necessary to strengthen national autonomy as well as social autonomy to achieve a balance between the two forces and to form a good interaction between the state and society.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：A811

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖崇慧;姜正君;;轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期中國(guó)市民社會(huì)與國(guó)家均衡互動(dòng)模式的建構(gòu)[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年03期

2 熊德仁;二重國(guó)家——對(duì)國(guó)家本質(zhì)的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];湖北師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年01期

3 鄧宏炎;論馬克思市民社會(huì)決定國(guó)家理論的形成——思想歷程與研究方法的考察[J];華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年06期

4 馬長(zhǎng)山;市民社會(huì)理論:法學(xué)現(xiàn)代化及法治研究的新視角[J];江蘇社會(huì)科學(xué);2001年04期

5 郭杰忠;生產(chǎn)力概念的制定及其對(duì)歷史唯物主義的意義[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年09期

6 楊謙;郭強(qiáng);;論馬克思社會(huì)與國(guó)家關(guān)系思想的雙重論域及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值[J];理論學(xué)刊;2009年05期

7 王貴賢;;《德意志意識(shí)形態(tài)》中的國(guó)家觀[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實(shí);2006年04期

8 鄧曉芒;;馬克思從黑格爾那里繼承了什么?[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實(shí);2008年02期

9 范翠紅;新中國(guó)成立初期國(guó)家與社會(huì)關(guān)系模式初探[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年02期

10 王明亮;;馬克思國(guó)家觀探析[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2011年20期

本文編號(hào)：1900469