發(fā)布時間：2018-05-09 09:35

  本文選題：東漢末年 + 月旦評��； 參考：《北京社會科學(xué)》2017年08期

【摘要】：東漢末年,許劭、許靖兄弟在汝南主持的"月旦評"轟動一時,它是在政治昏暗和士人清議之風(fēng)盛行的背景下形成的集會評議活動。評議對象包括各個階層的人士,以激濁揚(yáng)清為目的。"月旦評"的產(chǎn)生有著深厚的歷史文化原因,此外名士身份的影響力和號召力、評論效果的精準(zhǔn)對時人的折服、漢末仰慕名士的濃重風(fēng)習(xí),都對其有促成作用。因漢末人倫臧否行為會在一定程度上加劇黨派矛盾,冒充名士的沽名釣譽(yù)之徒也多有存在,故會招致一些地方豪強(qiáng)的抵制�？陀^看,"月旦評"在世風(fēng)日下之時的正義呼聲及對大量人才的發(fā)掘,自有其歷史價值所在。雖然許氏兄弟關(guān)系不協(xié),自身也有缺陷,但不能據(jù)此完全否定"月旦評"及二人厲行薦舉人才的功績。
[Abstract]:At the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty, Xu Shao and Xu Jing's "Moon Day Review", which was presided over in Runan, was a gathering and comment activity formed under the background of the dark politics and the prevailing style of intellectual debate. The review is aimed at people from all walks of life. " There are profound historical and cultural reasons for the creation of Yuetian Review. In addition, the influence and appeal of the celebrity identity, the accuracy of the comment effect to the admiration of the people of the time, and the strong customs of the famous people in the late Han Dynasty have all contributed to it. Because the behavior of Zang Zang in the late Han Dynasty will to a certain extent aggravate the contradiction between the parties, and there are also many people who flaunt famous people, it will cause some local people to resist strongly. From the view of visitors, the appeal of justice and the discovery of a large number of talents have their historical value. Although the Xu brothers do not cooperate with each other and have their own defects, they should not completely deny the merits of the "Moon Day Review" and the two men's efforts to recommend and raise talents.
【作者單位】： 青島大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：青島市社會科學(xué)規(guī)劃研究項目(QDSKL1601090)
【分類號】：K234.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 張鳴;后漢儒生的幸福生活[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟(jì)報道;2006年

，

本文編號：1865506