發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-16 21:26

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 私力救濟(jì) 自媒體意見表達(dá) 價(jià)值分析 正當(dāng)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)　出處：《天津商業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在私力救濟(jì)視角下,自媒體意見表達(dá)被用作私力救濟(jì)的工具,具有低成本、高效益的優(yōu)勢,被網(wǎng)絡(luò)用戶廣泛采用。然而由于缺乏法律的規(guī)制和引導(dǎo),權(quán)利人在利用自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)權(quán)利救濟(jì)的過程中,難以掌握行為的邊界,導(dǎo)致救濟(jì)過度而轉(zhuǎn)化成侵權(quán)行為的結(jié)果。司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)因自媒體意見表達(dá)侵犯人格權(quán)所引起的糾紛,也因缺少充分的法律依據(jù)和統(tǒng)一的法律適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn),裁判結(jié)果幾乎都是“一刀切”,認(rèn)定為侵權(quán),然而并非所有的利用自媒體實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì)的行為都是侵權(quán)行為。造成上述困境的根本原因,就在于對(duì)私力救濟(jì)視角下自媒體意見表達(dá)的正當(dāng)性,缺乏一個(gè)判定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。在本文中,筆者嘗試從民法和媒體法兩個(gè)角度分析影響私力救濟(jì)視角下自媒體意見表達(dá)正當(dāng)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的要素,在此基礎(chǔ)上論證利用自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì)行為的正當(dāng)性,并據(jù)此提出判定自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì)的正當(dāng)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。以期既能充分發(fā)揮自媒體意見表達(dá)的優(yōu)勢,又能對(duì)自媒體意見表達(dá)作出限制,為自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì)的正當(dāng)性劃定范圍,為權(quán)利人利用自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì),提供法律保障和依據(jù),避免因過度救濟(jì)引發(fā)侵權(quán)后果的發(fā)生,并為司法實(shí)踐提供一個(gè)明確的法律適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn),解決司法適用難題。第一部分,“前言”。主要介紹了本文寫作的現(xiàn)實(shí)和理論意義、擬解決的問題及研究方法,起到提綱挈領(lǐng)的作用。第二部分,“私力救濟(jì)視角下自媒體意見表達(dá)法律規(guī)制面臨的困境”。本章從司法實(shí)踐中法律適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和理論研究兩個(gè)角度,呈現(xiàn)了私力救濟(jì)私力救濟(jì)視角下自媒體意見表達(dá)所面臨的雙重困境,為本文寫作的主題進(jìn)行背景上的鋪墊。第三部分,“權(quán)利人選擇自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì)的原因”。本章從自媒體意見表達(dá)與私力救濟(jì)的關(guān)系、自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì)所具備的優(yōu)勢兩方面,對(duì)實(shí)踐中權(quán)利人選擇自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì)的原因進(jìn)行分析。以期站在行為人行為動(dòng)機(jī)的角度去討論行為的正當(dāng)性。第四部分,“私力救濟(jì)視角下自媒體意見表達(dá)的法價(jià)值分析及制度基礎(chǔ)”。本章擬從法理基礎(chǔ)和制度基礎(chǔ)兩個(gè)角度,以民法和媒體法為切入點(diǎn),探討自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì)的理論和制度基礎(chǔ)。結(jié)合“權(quán)利價(jià)值位階”、“自助行為理論”、“債務(wù)人容忍義務(wù)”、“言論豁免權(quán)和‘避風(fēng)港原則’”及“自媒體自凈規(guī)則”等方面研究私力救濟(jì)視角下自媒體意見表達(dá)正當(dāng)性的理論和制度基礎(chǔ)。第五部分,“私力救濟(jì)視角下自媒體意見表達(dá)的正當(dāng)性標(biāo)準(zhǔn)及具體適用”。本章在總結(jié)上述幾部分論述的基礎(chǔ)上,提出私力救濟(jì)視角下自媒體意見表達(dá)正當(dāng)性的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),即從行為的正當(dāng)性和合理性兩方面闡述自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì)行為的正當(dāng)性。依托司法實(shí)踐中的案例,分析自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì)與義務(wù)人的隱私權(quán)及名譽(yù)權(quán)發(fā)生沖突時(shí),權(quán)利人行為的正當(dāng)性。從而回扣全文主題,破解司法實(shí)踐中自媒體意見表達(dá)實(shí)現(xiàn)私力救濟(jì)的法律適用難題。
[Abstract]:In the private relief perspective, since the media opinion expression is used as a self-help tool, has the advantages of low cost, high efficiency, is widely used by Internet users. However, because of the lack of legal regulation and guidance, the right people in the use of media opinion expression process to achieve the right to relief, it is difficult to grasp the behavior boundary. Lead to excessive relief into the infringement results. In judicial practice, due to the media opinion expression of personality rights violations caused by the dispute, but also because of the lack of legal basis and legal standard unified fully, the referee results almost all "identified as infringement, but not all of the media to achieve self-help behavior is causing the plight of infringement. The fundamental reason lies in the relief, legitimacy from the perspective of media opinion on the expression of private power, the lack of a judgment standard in this paper. The author tries to analyze the influence, the private relief from the perspective of two aspects of civil law and media law elements from the media opinion expression standard of justice, on the basis of demonstration by media opinion expression realization of the legitimacy of self-help behavior, and puts forward views of implementation from the media to determine the legitimacy of private relief standards. In order to give full play to the advantages of self expression and media opinion, restrictions on the expression of opinion from the media from the media, opinion expression legitimacy range realization of private remedy, since the media opinion expression is private relief use rights, provide legal guarantee and basis, avoid excessive lead to the tort relief consequences, and provide a clear legal standard for the judicial practice, to solve the problem of judicial application. In the first part, "Introduction". This paper mainly introduces the writing of practical and theoretical significance And the problems to be solved and research methods, plays a leading role. In the second part, "private relief from the perspective of media opinion Legal Regulation dilemma". Two aspects of this chapter from the law applicable standards in judicial practice and theoretical research, presents the private relief of private relief from the perspective of media opinion expression of double dilemma, writing for this theme on the background of the bedding. The third part, "the right choice from the media opinion" implementation of private relief. This chapter from the expression of media opinion and private relief, since the media opinion expression of two aspects of the private remedy advantage in practice right choice since the media opinion expression reasons for private relief were analyzed. In order to stand in the legitimacy of the behavior motivation perspective to discuss the behavior. The fourth part, "private saving From the perspective of economic law from the media opinion expression value analysis and system basis. This chapter from two aspects of legal basis and system basis, with civil law and media law as the starting point, to explore the media opinion expression theory and system basis of private remedy. "With the right order of value", "self-help behavior the theory", "debtor tolerance obligations", "speech immunity and" safe haven "principle" and "self purification media rules and other aspects of the private relief from the perspective of media opinion expression theory and institutional legitimacy. The fifth part," private relief standard of justice from the perspective of media opinion and expression the specific application ". This chapter summarizes the above parts, proposed the private relief from the perspective of media opinion expression of the legitimacy of the standard is described from the media from the behavior of the legitimacy and rationality of two aspects The views expressed the proper implementation of self-help behavior. Based on the analysis of the case in the judicial practice, since the media opinion expression of private remedy right of privacy and reputation rights and obligations of the conflict, the legitimacy of human rights behavior. Thus the rebate text of the theme, crack in the judicial practice since the media opinion expression of applicable law problem private remedy.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津商業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙雅坤;;論民事權(quán)利的私力救濟(jì)[J];中北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年03期

2 徐長鵬;;自媒體時(shí)代下公安機(jī)關(guān)微信管控問題研究[J];新疆警察學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

3 鄭淑霞;;自媒體的法律規(guī)制研究[J];學(xué)理論;2014年28期

4 伏香凝;;“自媒體時(shí)代”新聞侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定和規(guī)制問題研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2014年27期

5 侯登華;;自媒體時(shí)代的隱私權(quán)保護(hù)——以人肉搜索為視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2014年09期

6 淳于慧雪;;淺談自媒體時(shí)代對(duì)新聞當(dāng)事人的隱私保護(hù)[J];戲劇之家;2014年11期

7 陳s��，

本文編號(hào)：1516468