后冷戰(zhàn)時(shí)代斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)的俄蘇研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-12-15 23:33
【摘要】:斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)地處歐洲北端,與俄羅斯隔海相望。雖然在俄蘇研究領(lǐng)域沒有美國和英國那樣聲名顯赫,但是獨(dú)特的地理位置,與俄羅斯長達(dá)一千多年的悠久歷史聯(lián)系,孕育出本地區(qū)相對獨(dú)特的俄蘇研究群體和學(xué)術(shù)思想。冷戰(zhàn)后,與美國、英國等西方主要國家的俄蘇研究范式轉(zhuǎn)型相似,斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)的俄蘇研究在傳統(tǒng)區(qū)域國別研究的基礎(chǔ)上更加重視學(xué)科理論的應(yīng)用。面對蘇聯(lián)解體后,俄羅斯轉(zhuǎn)型所帶來的學(xué)術(shù)研究機(jī)遇和潛在的經(jīng)濟(jì)機(jī)會(huì),斯堪的納維亞國家1990年代在俄蘇研究領(lǐng)域的投入不斷增加,本地區(qū)俄蘇研究的機(jī)構(gòu)和研究人員都出現(xiàn)了一定程度的增長。在此基礎(chǔ)上,斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)冷戰(zhàn)后的俄蘇研究取得了一系列成果,其國際知名度和影響力也有了相應(yīng)的提升,從而引起了中國學(xué)界的關(guān)注。本文主要研究的是斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)學(xué)術(shù)界在冷戰(zhàn)后對蘇聯(lián)和俄羅斯問題研究的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,是國際問題研究框架下,國別問題研究與國內(nèi)政治經(jīng)濟(jì)進(jìn)程研究的綜合。鑒于蘇聯(lián)解體后,西方轉(zhuǎn)型學(xué)理論對于俄羅斯的解釋力不足,需要將傳統(tǒng)的區(qū)域、國別研究與國內(nèi)進(jìn)程的深度闡述相結(jié)合。因而,一方面,本文通過對斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)俄蘇研究領(lǐng)域的學(xué)術(shù)發(fā)展面貌進(jìn)行概括,厘清這一特定地區(qū)俄蘇研究的特點(diǎn),從而觀察該地區(qū)學(xué)術(shù)研究如何與決策互動(dòng),從而影響地區(qū)政治;另一方面,這又是一個(gè)國際政治的命題,主要是觀察俄羅斯本身政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展與變化,如何成為該地區(qū)學(xué)術(shù)的“鏡像認(rèn)知”。為何同樣的俄羅斯現(xiàn)象會(huì)在不同地區(qū)的學(xué)術(shù)認(rèn)知中出現(xiàn)不同的分析與解釋?這一雙向互動(dòng)本身已經(jīng)成為當(dāng)代國際政治經(jīng)濟(jì)一個(gè)不可忽視的內(nèi)容。簡單地說,學(xué)術(shù)認(rèn)知已經(jīng)成為國際政治的重要工具。在整體結(jié)構(gòu)上,本文共分為三個(gè)主要組成部分,共10章節(jié)內(nèi)容。首先,對斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)俄蘇研究的歷史發(fā)展進(jìn)行梳理,對當(dāng)前研究狀況進(jìn)行總結(jié),并初步提出本地區(qū)俄蘇研究的特點(diǎn);隨后進(jìn)入本文的重點(diǎn)研究內(nèi)容——對本地區(qū)代表性學(xué)者的學(xué)術(shù)思想進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)性的解讀和分析,從學(xué)術(shù)史的分析中汲取盡可能多的營養(yǎng);最后,對本地區(qū)俄蘇研究的獨(dú)特性、面臨的挑戰(zhàn)進(jìn)行概括。第一組成部分緒論與第一章。在闡述本研究的源起,在理論、實(shí)踐和學(xué)術(shù)交流方面的意義,國內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀,基本框架和主要研究內(nèi)容,研究方法,以及創(chuàng)新和不足之處。第一章——斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)俄蘇研究概述。由歷史發(fā)展脈絡(luò)、當(dāng)前研究狀況以及研究特點(diǎn)的初步總結(jié)構(gòu)成。在歷史發(fā)展脈絡(luò)部分,回顧了本地區(qū)俄蘇研究的發(fā)展歷程、動(dòng)因和主要特點(diǎn)。在當(dāng)代研究狀況部分主要總結(jié)了冷戰(zhàn)后本地區(qū)俄蘇研究在機(jī)構(gòu)、人員方面的增長狀況,和研究議題的變化。初步認(rèn)為本地區(qū)俄蘇研究具有如下特點(diǎn):研究議題集中于中觀層面,具有一定程度的分散性特征,注重跨學(xué)科研究。第二組成部分,第二章至第八章,對于斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)俄蘇研究學(xué)界代表性學(xué)者的學(xué)術(shù)思想進(jìn)行針對性的個(gè)案分析。從代表性學(xué)者的所屬學(xué)科和研究領(lǐng)域出發(fā),劃分為三項(xiàng)主題。第一主題,冷戰(zhàn)后斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)的俄羅斯轉(zhuǎn)型研究,包括瑞典學(xué)者奧斯隆德從新自由主義視角下對俄羅斯資本主義革命的研究,瑞典學(xué)者赫德蘭在新制度主義背景下對俄羅斯轉(zhuǎn)型的研究,丹麥學(xué)者諾格德在比較政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)框架下下對原蘇東國家的轉(zhuǎn)型研究。第二主題,冷戰(zhàn)后斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)的俄羅斯歷史研究,包括芬蘭學(xué)者蘇特拉從經(jīng)濟(jì)思想史角度對蘇聯(lián)經(jīng)濟(jì)思想演進(jìn)的研究,丹麥學(xué)者羅森菲爾特從政治制度史角度對斯大林信息控制體系的歷史研究。第三主題,冷戰(zhàn)后斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)的俄羅斯外交研究,包括挪威學(xué)者諾依曼基于治理模式認(rèn)同視角對俄羅斯與國際社會(huì)(歐洲)關(guān)系的研究,瑞典學(xué)者瓊森從政策分析角度對俄羅斯1991年至20世紀(jì)初零和觀念下中亞政策的研究。之所以選擇這兩位學(xué)者,主要是考慮到其研究對象在俄羅斯外交戰(zhàn)略中的重要性。歐洲不僅在歷史上一直是俄羅斯的主要交往對象和西方化思想的來源,更是俄羅斯在轉(zhuǎn)型進(jìn)程中的重要合作伙伴。中亞對于俄羅斯來說更像是“兄弟”,它們不僅有著深厚的歷史聯(lián)系,從現(xiàn)實(shí)方面來看,中亞地區(qū)是俄羅斯在后蘇聯(lián)時(shí)代以及后蘇聯(lián)空間中,重要的戰(zhàn)略支點(diǎn)。第三組成部分,結(jié)論—一相對均衡、務(wù)實(shí)、兼容發(fā)展的斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)俄蘇研究;趯λ箍暗募{維亞地區(qū)俄蘇研究歷史發(fā)展脈絡(luò),冷戰(zhàn)后研究現(xiàn)狀和代表性學(xué)者學(xué)術(shù)思想的分析和了解,就冷戰(zhàn)后本地區(qū)的俄蘇研究就行綜合性評(píng)價(jià)。相對于文化同源的美國和英國,斯堪的納維亞地區(qū)因?yàn)楠?dú)特的地理位置、歷史文化傳統(tǒng)和利益訴求,在俄蘇研究的立場方面力求均衡;以政策需要為研究導(dǎo)向,講求務(wù)實(shí)性;在研究議題、研究途徑、研究方法、研究框架等方面表現(xiàn)出兼容并包的特征。
[Abstract]:Scandinavia is located at the north end of Europe and is looking at Russia. Although the Russian-Soviet research field is not as well-known as the United States and the United Kingdom, the unique geographical location, with the long history of Russia for more than a thousand years, is a relatively unique Russian-Soviet research group and academic thought in the region. After the cold war, with the transformation of the Russian-Soviet research paradigm of the major western countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, the Russian-Soviet research in the Scandinavia region has given more attention to the application of the subject theory on the basis of the traditional regional studies. In the face of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the academic research opportunities and potential economic opportunities brought by the transformation of Russia, the input of Scandinavian countries in the field of Soviet research in the 1990s has increased, and both the institutions and researchers of the Russian-Soviet research in the region have witnessed a certain degree of growth. On the basis of this, the Russian-Soviet research after the cold war in Scandinavia has made a series of achievements, and its international popularity and influence have also improved correspondingly, thus causing the attention of the Chinese academic circle. The main research of this paper is the development of the research of the Soviet Union and Russia after the cold war, which is the synthesis of the research of the country problem and the research of the political and economic process of the country under the framework of the international problem. In the light of the collapse of the Soviet Union, the western theory of transformation is not enough to explain the Russian interpretation, and it is necessary to combine the traditional region, the country study and the depth of the domestic process. On the one hand, on the one hand, by summarizing the academic development of the Russian-Soviet research field in Scandinavia, this paper makes a clear study of the characteristics of the Russian-Soviet research in this particular region, thus observing how to interact with the decision-making in the region, thus affecting the regional politics; on the other hand, This is another proposition of international politics, mainly to observe the development and change of Russia's own politics and economy, and how to become the academic 鈥渋mage cognition鈥,
本文編號(hào):2381468
[Abstract]:Scandinavia is located at the north end of Europe and is looking at Russia. Although the Russian-Soviet research field is not as well-known as the United States and the United Kingdom, the unique geographical location, with the long history of Russia for more than a thousand years, is a relatively unique Russian-Soviet research group and academic thought in the region. After the cold war, with the transformation of the Russian-Soviet research paradigm of the major western countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, the Russian-Soviet research in the Scandinavia region has given more attention to the application of the subject theory on the basis of the traditional regional studies. In the face of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the academic research opportunities and potential economic opportunities brought by the transformation of Russia, the input of Scandinavian countries in the field of Soviet research in the 1990s has increased, and both the institutions and researchers of the Russian-Soviet research in the region have witnessed a certain degree of growth. On the basis of this, the Russian-Soviet research after the cold war in Scandinavia has made a series of achievements, and its international popularity and influence have also improved correspondingly, thus causing the attention of the Chinese academic circle. The main research of this paper is the development of the research of the Soviet Union and Russia after the cold war, which is the synthesis of the research of the country problem and the research of the political and economic process of the country under the framework of the international problem. In the light of the collapse of the Soviet Union, the western theory of transformation is not enough to explain the Russian interpretation, and it is necessary to combine the traditional region, the country study and the depth of the domestic process. On the one hand, on the one hand, by summarizing the academic development of the Russian-Soviet research field in Scandinavia, this paper makes a clear study of the characteristics of the Russian-Soviet research in this particular region, thus observing how to interact with the decision-making in the region, thus affecting the regional politics; on the other hand, This is another proposition of international politics, mainly to observe the development and change of Russia's own politics and economy, and how to become the academic 鈥渋mage cognition鈥,
本文編號(hào):2381468
本文鏈接:http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/shoufeilunwen/sklbs/2381468.html
最近更新
教材專著