作為法律原則的相互原則：從國(guó)際水道法及中國(guó)跨界水條約實(shí)踐探究相互原則的作用
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2024-06-10 21:22
作為社會(huì)交往中的基本現(xiàn)象與國(guó)際法中的基本法律原則,相互原則的重要性再怎么強(qiáng)調(diào)也不為過(guò)。有鑒于此,本文擬首先明確相互原則在國(guó)際法中的作用,并基于此審慎地分析其對(duì)國(guó)際水道法產(chǎn)生的影響。通常,可以從三個(gè)層面理解相互原則在國(guó)際法中的功能:第一,作為一種發(fā)展國(guó)際法的機(jī)制;第二,作為一種條約機(jī)制;第三,作為一種爭(zhēng)端解決與實(shí)施機(jī)制。與這三個(gè)層面分別對(duì)應(yīng),相互原則在國(guó)際水道法中發(fā)揮著如下作用:第一,將限領(lǐng)土主權(quán)原則確立為習(xí)慣國(guó)際法;第二,明確實(shí)體規(guī)則中相應(yīng)的權(quán)利與義務(wù);第三,考慮到跨界水領(lǐng)域中更強(qiáng)調(diào)爭(zhēng)端的避免,而非規(guī)則的遵行,相互原則還進(jìn)一步推動(dòng)著程序與爭(zhēng)端解決規(guī)則的發(fā)展。具體而言,在相互原則的作用下,一國(guó)所提出的訴求也能夠被其他國(guó)家主張,這就有效抑制了一國(guó)提出過(guò)分且不合理的主張的可能性。通過(guò)這種作用機(jī)制,相互原則推動(dòng)著習(xí)慣國(guó)際法的發(fā)展。“公平合理利用”和“避免重大損害的義務(wù)”這兩大實(shí)體規(guī)則經(jīng)常被認(rèn)為偏袒著上游或下游國(guó)家一方。然而,我們明顯可以看到它們實(shí)際上規(guī)定了具有相互性的權(quán)利與義務(wù),以保證法律適用者對(duì)它們的解釋并不會(huì)偏好上游或下游的任一沿岸國(guó)同理的,與實(shí)體規(guī)則相輔相成的程序規(guī)則,如信息互換事先通知...
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：224 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【文章目錄】：
ABSTRACT
摘要
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROBLEMATIQUE AND RESEARCH QUESTION
1.2 RESEARCH JUSTIFICATION
1.2.1 The Legal Principle of Reciprocity
1.2.2 The Law of International Watercourses
1.2.3 Selection of Case Study:China
1.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND OUTLINE OF DISSERTATION
CHAPTER 2 RECIPROCITY: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LEGAL PRINCIPLE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.2 OVERCOMING THE PROBLEM OF COOPERATION THROUGH RECIPROCITY
2.2.1 Reciprocity as an Anthropological, Sociological and Moral Norm
2.3 RECIPROCITY AS A FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLE OF LAW
2.3.1 Reciprocity and the Rule of Law
2.3.2 Translating the Principle of Reciprocity to International Law
2.4 RECIPROCITY IN CHINA'S STATE RELATIONS AND ITS APPROACH TOINTERNATIONAL LAW
2.5 CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 3 RECIPROCITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAWOF INTERNATIONAL WATERCOURSES
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AS A PROCESS OFRECIPROCATION
3.3 RECIPROCATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIMITED TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY
3.3.1 Absolute Territorial Sovereignty and Absolute Territorial Integrity
3.3.2 The Emergence of Limited Territorial Sovereignty
3.4 BALANCING PERSISTENT OBJECTION THROUGH RECIPROCITY:CHINA'SPRACTICE AS LIMITED TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY
3.4.1 Reciprocity and Persistent Objection
3.4.2 China's Transboundary Water Treaty Practice:Limited Territorial Sovereignty
3.5 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAW OF INTERNATIONALWATERCOURSES:THE COMMUNITY OF INTERESTS AND CHINA'S"COMMUNITY OF COMMON DESTINY"
3.6 CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 4 RECIPROCITY AS A TREATY MECHANISM IN THE SUBSTANTIVE RULES
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 RECIPROCITY IN TREATIES:RECIPROCATING AND NON-RECIPROCATINGPROVISIONS
4.2.1 Reciprocating Treaty Provisions
4.2.2 Non-Reciprocating Treaty Provisions
4.3 UNDERSTANDING THE SUBSTANTIVE RULES THROUGH THE LENS OFRECIPROCITY:THE UNWC, UNECE WATER CONVENTION,BERLIN RULESAND CHINA'S PRACTICE
4.3.1 The Substantive Rules of the UNWC
4.3.2 The Substantive Rules of the UNECE Water Convention
4.3.3 The Berlin Rules:An Alternative Relationship between the Substantive Rules?
4.3.4 China's Transboundary Water Treaty Practice:The Substantive Rules
4.4 THE INFLUENCE OF COMMON INTERESTS ON THE SUBSTANTIVE RULES
4.4.1 The Human Right to Water in a Transboundary Context
4.4.2 Environmental Protection and Sustainability
4.4.3 China's Transboundary Water Treaty Practice:The Influence of Common Interests
4.5 INSTITUTIONALISING RECIPROCITY THROUGH RIVER BASIN ORGANIZATIONS AND BENEFIT-SHARING
4.5.1 China's Transboundary Water Treaty Practice:Institutionalization and Benefit Sharing
4.6 CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 5 RECIPROCITY IN THE DUTY TO COOPERATE, RULES OFPROCEDURE AND SELF-HELP MEASURES
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 THE LEGAL NOTION OF RECIPROCITY AND THE DUTY TO COOPERATE
5.3 UNDERSTANDING THE PROCEDURAL AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT RULESTHROUGH THE LENS OF RECIPROCITY
5.3.1 The Procedural Rules of the UNWC
5.3.2 The Procedural Rules of the UNECE Water Convention
5.3.3 The Settlement of Disputes in the UNWC and UNECE Water Convention
5.3.4 China's Transboundary Water Treaty Practice:Reciprocity in the Procedural Rules
5.4 SELF-HELP MEASURES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THEIR LIMITEDAPPLICATION IN THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL WATERCOURSES
5.5 EXPLORING THE LIMITED USE OF SELF-HELP MEASURES IN THE CONTEXTOF RECIPROCITY AND THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL WATERCOURSES
5.5.1 Reciprocity and Higher-Level Legal Norms
5.5.2 The Duty to Cooperate as an Emerging Obligation Erga Omnes andits Effects on the Use of Self-Help Measures
5.6 CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION
APPENDIX A: LIST OF PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED MATERIALS
APPENDIX B: STATE PARTIES TO THE UNWC AND UNECE WATERCONVENTION
APPENDIX C: STATE COMMENTS AND VOTING RECORD OF THEUNWC
APPENDIX D: LIST OF CHINA'S TRANSBOUNDARY WATERAGREEMENTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS
APPENDIX E: TIMELINE OF THE LANCANG-MEKONG COOPERATION MECHANISM
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
本文編號(hào)：3991916
【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：224 頁(yè)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【文章目錄】：
ABSTRACT
摘要
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROBLEMATIQUE AND RESEARCH QUESTION
1.2 RESEARCH JUSTIFICATION
1.2.1 The Legal Principle of Reciprocity
1.2.2 The Law of International Watercourses
1.2.3 Selection of Case Study:China
1.3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND OUTLINE OF DISSERTATION
CHAPTER 2 RECIPROCITY: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A LEGAL PRINCIPLE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
2.2 OVERCOMING THE PROBLEM OF COOPERATION THROUGH RECIPROCITY
2.2.1 Reciprocity as an Anthropological, Sociological and Moral Norm
2.3 RECIPROCITY AS A FOUNDATIONAL PRINCIPLE OF LAW
2.3.1 Reciprocity and the Rule of Law
2.3.2 Translating the Principle of Reciprocity to International Law
2.4 RECIPROCITY IN CHINA'S STATE RELATIONS AND ITS APPROACH TOINTERNATIONAL LAW
2.5 CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 3 RECIPROCITY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAWOF INTERNATIONAL WATERCOURSES
3.1 INTRODUCTION
3.2 THE DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AS A PROCESS OFRECIPROCATION
3.3 RECIPROCATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF LIMITED TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY
3.3.1 Absolute Territorial Sovereignty and Absolute Territorial Integrity
3.3.2 The Emergence of Limited Territorial Sovereignty
3.4 BALANCING PERSISTENT OBJECTION THROUGH RECIPROCITY:CHINA'SPRACTICE AS LIMITED TERRITORIAL SOVEREIGNTY
3.4.1 Reciprocity and Persistent Objection
3.4.2 China's Transboundary Water Treaty Practice:Limited Territorial Sovereignty
3.5 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LAW OF INTERNATIONALWATERCOURSES:THE COMMUNITY OF INTERESTS AND CHINA'S"COMMUNITY OF COMMON DESTINY"
3.6 CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 4 RECIPROCITY AS A TREATY MECHANISM IN THE SUBSTANTIVE RULES
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 RECIPROCITY IN TREATIES:RECIPROCATING AND NON-RECIPROCATINGPROVISIONS
4.2.1 Reciprocating Treaty Provisions
4.2.2 Non-Reciprocating Treaty Provisions
4.3 UNDERSTANDING THE SUBSTANTIVE RULES THROUGH THE LENS OFRECIPROCITY:THE UNWC, UNECE WATER CONVENTION,BERLIN RULESAND CHINA'S PRACTICE
4.3.1 The Substantive Rules of the UNWC
4.3.2 The Substantive Rules of the UNECE Water Convention
4.3.3 The Berlin Rules:An Alternative Relationship between the Substantive Rules?
4.3.4 China's Transboundary Water Treaty Practice:The Substantive Rules
4.4 THE INFLUENCE OF COMMON INTERESTS ON THE SUBSTANTIVE RULES
4.4.1 The Human Right to Water in a Transboundary Context
4.4.2 Environmental Protection and Sustainability
4.4.3 China's Transboundary Water Treaty Practice:The Influence of Common Interests
4.5 INSTITUTIONALISING RECIPROCITY THROUGH RIVER BASIN ORGANIZATIONS AND BENEFIT-SHARING
4.5.1 China's Transboundary Water Treaty Practice:Institutionalization and Benefit Sharing
4.6 CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 5 RECIPROCITY IN THE DUTY TO COOPERATE, RULES OFPROCEDURE AND SELF-HELP MEASURES
5.1 INTRODUCTION
5.2 THE LEGAL NOTION OF RECIPROCITY AND THE DUTY TO COOPERATE
5.3 UNDERSTANDING THE PROCEDURAL AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT RULESTHROUGH THE LENS OF RECIPROCITY
5.3.1 The Procedural Rules of the UNWC
5.3.2 The Procedural Rules of the UNECE Water Convention
5.3.3 The Settlement of Disputes in the UNWC and UNECE Water Convention
5.3.4 China's Transboundary Water Treaty Practice:Reciprocity in the Procedural Rules
5.4 SELF-HELP MEASURES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THEIR LIMITEDAPPLICATION IN THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL WATERCOURSES
5.5 EXPLORING THE LIMITED USE OF SELF-HELP MEASURES IN THE CONTEXTOF RECIPROCITY AND THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL WATERCOURSES
5.5.1 Reciprocity and Higher-Level Legal Norms
5.5.2 The Duty to Cooperate as an Emerging Obligation Erga Omnes andits Effects on the Use of Self-Help Measures
5.6 CONCLUSION
CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSION
APPENDIX A: LIST OF PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED MATERIALS
APPENDIX B: STATE PARTIES TO THE UNWC AND UNECE WATERCONVENTION
APPENDIX C: STATE COMMENTS AND VOTING RECORD OF THEUNWC
APPENDIX D: LIST OF CHINA'S TRANSBOUNDARY WATERAGREEMENTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS
APPENDIX E: TIMELINE OF THE LANCANG-MEKONG COOPERATION MECHANISM
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
本文編號(hào)：3991916
本文鏈接：http://www.wukwdryxk.cn/shoufeilunwen/sklbs/3991916.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著
