發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-18 10:18

  本文選題：《白虎通義》 + 言說方式　； 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：《白虎通義》是在東漢章帝親自干預(yù)學(xué)術(shù)活動的情況下脫胎的政治性文件。它上承西周以來的神學(xué)天命觀,吸納董仲舒《春秋》公羊?qū)W“天人感應(yīng)”的基本思維模式,以陰陽五行為基本框架,征引五經(jīng)等今古文經(jīng)學(xué)文本,折射出了東漢的政治、學(xué)術(shù)思想與今古文經(jīng)學(xué)的狀貌,有著深厚的學(xué)術(shù)與文獻(xiàn)價(jià)值,被譽(yù)為“封建教科書”。自清以降,《白虎通義》被定性為“經(jīng)解類”文獻(xiàn),對其研究缺乏重視,其原因少有人探究。目前除考據(jù)等方面的研究成果外,學(xué)界主要聚焦于聲訓(xùn)、哲學(xué)、政治、綱常、經(jīng)學(xué)等領(lǐng)域,鮮有文學(xué)性的研究,對其整個(gè)構(gòu)思脈絡(luò)的分析尚未見成果。現(xiàn)立足于分析《白虎通義》的文學(xué)特色,通過對其言說方式的論述,力圖還原其產(chǎn)生的真實(shí)動因,探討其目錄學(xué)歸屬與性質(zhì)等問題,透析《白虎通義》與章帝制禮等關(guān)系。本文擬對《白虎通義》研究面臨的一系列問題以言說方式為切入點(diǎn)進(jìn)行探究,由緒論、正文(共六章)、結(jié)語三部分構(gòu)成。緒論以敷陳《白虎通義》的研究近況為主體,言明本文選題的因由、價(jià)值及研究方法。第一章,對“言說方式”的概念進(jìn)行粗淺界定。鑒于“言說方式”這一術(shù)語的權(quán)威性研究譯著寥寥無幾,國內(nèi)使用者又多持含混的態(tài)度,“用”多于“思”,“言說方式”的概念界定成為了一個(gè)被學(xué)界疏漏的問題。此章以目前學(xué)術(shù)成果中出現(xiàn)的“言說方式”為背景,提煉出具有代表性的“言說方式”的文獻(xiàn)資料,從闡釋學(xué)、修辭學(xué)、文體學(xué)角度加以歸納、區(qū)分,繼而總結(jié)出“言說方式”的內(nèi)涵。第二章,討論目前關(guān)于《白虎通義》尚未定論且具有重大價(jià)值的問題。《白虎通義》的目錄學(xué)歸屬與性質(zhì)等問題仍莫衷一是,這與白虎觀會議召開的目的、緣起與《白虎通義》文本呈現(xiàn)的駁雜性均有很大關(guān)系。關(guān)于其性質(zhì)的辨析,筆者佐以《白虎通義》文本之內(nèi)容構(gòu)成進(jìn)行初步說明。此章所羅列的具有爭議性與不確定性的問題正是本文力圖解決的,也為下文通過言說方式來解析這一系列問題做鋪墊。第三章,分析《白虎通義》言說方式中的問答思辨之論述體例與獨(dú)特的言語藝術(shù)�！栋谆⑼�義》文本的問答對話體式十分鮮明,將《白虎通義》的問答與漢大賦的主客問答相聯(lián)系,且對其內(nèi)容條分縷析,將《白虎通義》的問答形式進(jìn)行分類、統(tǒng)計(jì),總結(jié)出14類問答行文模式。依照文本中的多種甚而相悖的條文,揭示出這個(gè)“稱制臨決”的會議背后所隱含的時(shí)代之禮制缺失的困境。從其訓(xùn)詁的運(yùn)用與章句元素的穿插角度,窮極一切的附會陰陽五行的角度,凸顯其獨(dú)特的言語特色。第四章,分析《白虎通義》言說方式中的引經(jīng)據(jù)典之論證形式。該部分統(tǒng)計(jì)歸納了征引的五經(jīng)今古文經(jīng)學(xué)文本、讖緯等內(nèi)容。意圖揭示《白虎通義》并未觸及到“講議五經(jīng)異同”這一事實(shí),多方征引是章帝面對禮樂意識形態(tài)的匱乏所做出的理論搜羅。第五章,探討《白虎通義》問答行文與訓(xùn)詁章句穿插這一言說方式的意義:“正名”。問答行文,“答”是關(guān)鍵,“問”可以忽略,這是章帝“決斷”的專制表征。訓(xùn)詁與“章句”的運(yùn)用,形成了一種以闡說義理為主導(dǎo)的名詞解釋性言語,這是政治干預(yù)學(xué)術(shù)的規(guī)約性表征。正名的意圖是使一切事物道德化,利用道德的象征意義掩飾制度的不平等與美化政權(quán)。第六章,探究言說方式之“存異說”與多方“引典”的價(jià)值。東漢章帝時(shí)期禮樂制度理據(jù)缺失,故需多方征引、搜集。此部分從西漢以來官方主流意識形態(tài)的禮制缺失梳理,過渡到《白虎通義》中禮制缺失的表現(xiàn),從而闡明《白虎通義》與禮制的關(guān)系。證實(shí)白虎觀會議的發(fā)起是章帝為制作漢禮所做的籌備工作。援引經(jīng)典的“多”與“雜”牽涉出《白虎通義》與雜家的關(guān)系考辨,從而對《白虎通義》的性質(zhì)與分類歸屬問題做新的探究。
[Abstract]:The "white tiger" is a political document of the Eastern Han Dynasty Zhang Emperor himself intervened in the academic activities. It has inherited the basic thinking mode of Dong Zhongshu's theology since the Western Zhou Dynasty, and absorbed the basic thinking mode of the "heaven and man induction" in the study of the spring and autumn and autumn and the goats. It has a profound academic and literature value, which has a profound academic and literature value, and has been praised as a "feudal textbook". Since the Qing Dynasty, "the white tiger" is defined as the "Confucian classics", it lacks attention to its research, and its reasons are seldom explored. In addition to the research results of the textual research, the academic circles mainly focus on sound training and philosophy. There are few literary studies in the fields of learning, politics, program and study, and there are few achievements in the analysis of the whole conception. Based on the analysis of the literary features of the "white tiger", the paper tries to restore the real motivation of its production by discussing the ways of his speech, and discusses the problems of the attribution and nature of its catalogues and so on. This article intends to explore a series of problems in the study of the "white tiger" meaning, which is an introduction to the way of speaking. It is made up of the introduction, the text (six chapters) and the conclusion of the three part. In view of the definition of the term, there are few authoritative studies on the term "way of speech", and the domestic users are more ambiguous, "use" more than "thought", and the definition of "way of speaking" is a problem that has been neglected by the academic community. In the second chapter, the second chapter discusses the issue of the question of "White Tiger Tong Yi", which has not yet been determined and has significant value. There is still no agreement on the problem, which has a great relationship with the purpose of the white tiger view conference, the origin and the confusion of the text of the white tiger, and the author makes a preliminary explanation of the nature of the white tiger. The third chapter analyzes the series of questions by the way of speech. Chapter 1, the analysis of the style and the unique language art of the question and answer thinking in the "white tiger" meaning. The paper classifies the question and answer form of the "white tiger" and sums up the 14 types of question and answer pattern. According to the various articles in the text, it reveals the dilemma of the lack of etiquette in the times behind the meeting of the "called system to be decided". All of them are attached to the five lines of yin and Yang, highlighting their unique speech features. The fourth chapter analyses the form of the argumentation in the way of "white tiger meaning" and the way of speaking. The multiparty citation is the theoretical search of Zhang Di in the face of the lack of the ideology of etiquette and music. In the fifth chapter, it discusses the meaning of the interspersing of "white tiger meaning", "question answer" and "exegesis", "correct name", "question and answer", "answer" is the key, "question" can be ignored. This is the autocratic representation of Zhang Di's "decision". Exegesis and "chapter sentence" It has formed a kind of noun interpretive speech which is dominated by the theory of justice. This is the normative representation of the political intervention. The intention of the name is to make all things moralization and use the symbolic meaning of morality to disguise the system of unequal and beautify the regime. The sixth chapter is to explore the way of saying "save the difference" and "allusion". Value. The system of etiquette and music in the period of the Eastern Han Dynasty is missing, so it needs to be collected and collected in many ways. This part from the absence of the official mainstream ideology since the Western Han Dynasty, the transition to the expression of the lack of etiquette in the "white tiger", thus clarifying the relationship between the "white tiger" and the etiquette system. In the preparatory work, the classical "more" and "miscellaneous" were involved in the textual research of the relationship between the "white tiger" and the miscellaneous family, so as to make a new inquiry into the nature and classification of the "white tiger".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：I206.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何新文;王慧;;班固的“賦頌”理論及其《兩都賦》“頌漢”的賦史意義[J];中南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2015年02期

2 季乃禮;;人際關(guān)系的和諧與統(tǒng)一——《白虎通》的治理思想研究[J];上海行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年01期

3 來新夏;;辨章雜家 提要鉤玄——司馬朝軍《續(xù)修四庫全書雜家類提要》序[J];出版科學(xué);2014年02期

4 李旭然;;老、荀思想關(guān)照下的“深察名號”理論[J];科學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會;2013年03期

5 李勇強(qiáng);;《白虎通義》“援讖證經(jīng)”研究[J];洛陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

6 呂玲;;“禮”“名”小議[J];黑龍江史志;2012年21期

7 張慧楠;;論《白虎通義》在目錄書中的分類及歸屬[J];劍南文學(xué)(經(jīng)典教苑);2012年02期

8 白瑞芬;;從《白虎通義》的聲訓(xùn)條例看其語音特點(diǎn)[J];湖北社會科學(xué);2011年10期

9 羅毓平;;《深察名號》本體建構(gòu)的邏輯進(jìn)路[J];船山學(xué)刊;2011年02期

10 馬國棟;;《白虎通義》成書及其性質(zhì)考論[J];贛南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 肖航;《白虎通義》政治思想研究[D];武漢大學(xué);2010年

2 郭偉宏;趙岐《孟子章句》研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

3 郜積意;劉歆與兩漢今古文學(xué)之爭[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 何大海;《白虎通》讖緯類文獻(xiàn)研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2014年

2 安文強(qiáng);董仲舒正名思想研究[D];湖北大學(xué);2014年

3 宋文婕;雜家內(nèi)涵研究[D];西南大學(xué);2012年

4 倪可風(fēng);白虎通涉易問題研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2011年

5 邵紅艷;中華書局本《白虎通疏證》補(bǔ)校[D];浙江大學(xué);2010年

6 鄭穎;《白虎通》引文釋例[D];浙江大學(xué);2009年

7 羊霞;東漢聲訓(xùn)理據(jù)研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2008年

8 郭向敏;《白虎通》聲訓(xùn)詞研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2006年

9 王珍珍;“正名”與先秦儒家美學(xué)[D];鄭州大學(xué);2005年

10 王麗俊;《白虎通義》聲訓(xùn)研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：1905458